Marian Reflections III: Panagia, All Holy One (Part I)

Last updated on: March 4, 2016 at 2:56 pm by Henry Karlson

Marian Reflections III: Panagia, All Holy One (Part I) 2016-03-04T14:56:28-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Icon of St Anne with Infant Mary on Wall; Photograph by Henry Karlson

Mary’s personal freedom from sin, as seen in both her sinless life as well as in regards her immaculate conception, remains one of the most controversial aspects of Marian theology. For some, such as with the Orthodox, the controversy is more apparent than real, and comes more out of miscommunication than it does with any real dogmatic disagreement.[1] For others, such as with many Protestants, the denial is pure, and not just a miscommunication, although it usually comes without any real understanding as to why the teaching is taught nor as to how it is interpreted or understood by Catholics.

Because of their rejection of the teaching, some Orthodox and many Protestants, think they can prove it wrong by asking what they believe are impossible questions to answer except by denial of Catholic teaching. They are, for the most part, founded upon the premise that Scripture indicates that Mary, like everyone else, was a sinner. Did not St. Paul declare, “all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God” (Rom. 3:32 RSV)? And did not Mary herself indicate this to be true of her when she said, “My soul magnifies the Lord, and my spirit rejoices in God my Savior” (Lk. 1:46-7 RSV)? Why would she say God is her savior if she is herself sinless? Does that not end up being a contradiction?

Nonetheless, when a proper theological examination is made concerning the holiness of Mary, these questions do not end up being as difficult as they first appear. For most of them, the answer is related to who she is and how she acts with God, in perfect harmony with God, throughout her life. Secondarily, there are also exegetical concerns, where a proper reading of Scripture, understanding how rhetorical flourishes are used by its authors, is also necessary.

Thus, the answer, for example, to questions related as to how God is said to be her savior if she is sinless is simple. It is because of the grace of God in her life that Mary was able to live a life of perfect human holiness. Grace perfects nature, allowing it to reach its full potential. Mary’s nature, like all human nature, was good, for all that is created by God, insofar as it keeps to the nature given to it, is good.[2]

Mary, unlike us, did not suffer the effects of sin, and so did not suffer, in her person, any diminution of her nature.[3] Sin makes us abandon our good nature, and so in and through our personal mode of being, become less than natural in what we do. For when we find ourselves in a state which is less than natural, we no longer have with us the full power or potential which was given to us in and by the nature God gracefully rendered to us. Once we have fallen into sin, we no longer can fulfill our potential in God because we have closed ourselves off from him. Therefore, as a result of sin, we find ourselves incapable of doing that which God desires us to do, for that would require us to live out and achieve our natural potential, a potential we no longer possess in our person thanks to sin. Thanks to grace, thanks to the forgiveness of sins, we can be raised back up and find ourselves restored to our original nature, to the good and potential we possess in and through it. When we turn ourselves to Christ, through him we are brought back to communion with God, open to him and his grace, and ready to be directed by him and follow him wherever he should lead. To follow that lead requires us to continue to be open to grace, to let it continue to penetrate us in our communion with God, so that we find that grace not only heals us from our sins but gives us perseverance against further sin.[4] That is, when we find someone does not sin, though no healing grace is needed to overcome the damage done by sin, grace continues to be in effect, giving them what they need in order to be able to preserve themselves from sin.[5] Thus, when someone does not sin, they have opened themselves up to God and his grace, and it is his grace which allows them to remain without sin, and so in and through that grace, God is able to be said to be their savior, saving them from sin. [6]

Mary, the humble handmaiden of the Lord, proclaimed with full humility that God was her savior. She knew in the fullness of her spirit that she would be nothing without his grace. She knew God not only as her creator, but also as her preserver in the world as well as the goal of her life (by entering a loving union with him in eternity). She was given an extraordinary role in creation, chosen to be the Mother of God, though it was a role she had to freely assent to in order to fulfill that role. And that meant she had to be entirely free, without the taint of sin, with no loss of liberty in her that would prevent her from giving a full and total surrender to God’s will. Thus, the preservation of her grace, in and all her life, was a precondition for God becoming incarnate in her.

We find confirmation of this by the words of the Archangel Gabriel, who, upon meeting with Mary, said, “Hail, full of grace, the Lord is with you!” (Lk.1:28 RSV). Only one without sin, without any barrier to grace, can be said to be full of grace. Mary’s sinless life was, therefore, a thing of wonder and joy to the angel. Gabriel declared to her the greatness which God had found in her. And, once her status was proclaimed, he was able to announce to her that she had found “favor” with God (Lk. 1:30). Because of her great holiness, she did not need any grace to heal her from sin, for she had no sin which needed healing, and yet she was to be given a favor, a boon, which separated her from all others: while still a virgin, she would conceive and give birth to a son, Jesus, the messiah and Son of God the Father (cf. Lk. 1:31-3). This special favor could be given to her because she had no sin, having nothing in her that stood in in the way of the full and total self-giving of herself to God, and therefore, nothing in her that could or would block God’s work in her. This boon, therefore, gave her a special role, indeed, a central role in salvation history, for it was the choice of God that she would become the mother of the messiah, Jesus, the God-Man.

More to Come.

[1] Orthodox theological styles use different means and explanations than is found in Roman Catholic theology, and as such, many Orthodox misread the Catholic response by engaging the wrong hermeneutic. And, likewise, many Roman Catholics, looking to the Orthodox, do the same thing, wanting identical theological methodologies when such is not necessary. Lack of charity allows this confusion to end in mutual hostility and division when it is not necessary. When those who are more charitable look beyond the beyond the words and theological logic used to explain the teaching and look to the teaching itself, and what is meant by it, this lack of any real difference between the two becomes readily apparent. And yet, as Vladimir Solovyov once noted, some in the Orthodox world lack so much charity that they end up denying basics of the faith if Rome promotes it, which is often why some Orthodox seem to slowly diverge from the general teaching and into erroneous propositions such as on the holiness of Mary (giving fuel for Protestant critiques of Catholic dogma):

This pseudo-Orthodox of our theological schools, which has nothing in common with the faith of the Universal Church or the piety of the Russian people, contains no positive element; it consists merely of arbitrary negations produced and maintained by controversial prejudice:

‘God the Son does not contribute in the divine order to the procession of the Holy Spirit.’

‘The Blessed Virgin was not immaculate from the first moment of her existence.’

‘Primacy of jurisdiction does not belong to the see of Rome and the Pope has not the dogmatic authority of a Pastor and Doctor of the Universal Church.’

Such as the principle negations which we shall have to examine in due course. For our present purpose it is enough to observe in the first place that these negations have received no sort of religious sanction, and do not rest on any ecclesiastical authority accepted by all the Orthodox as binding and infallible.

Vladimir Solovyov, Russia and the Universal Church. trans. Herbert Rees (London: Geoffrey Bless, 1948), 48.

[2] “And God saw everything that he had made, and behold, it was very good” (Gen. 1:31 RSV).

[3] How she was conceived without sin will soon be explored, but for now, it is being taken for granted.

[4] While not important for our text here, it is worth mentioning that there is another potential effect of grace, its deifying nature, in which we find it lifts us up beyond our nature, and opens us up to be “partakers of the divine nature” (cf. 2 Ptr. 1:4).

[5] Theologically speaking, we can say that as long as Adam and Eve obeyed God’s will, they were sinless; they were in communion with God. That communion opened them up to grace, which, until they chose to act against God’s will, they received for their blessing. However, once they chose to act against God’s will, they closed themselves off from communion with God, and the grace which raised them up and made them holy was lost to them, so they were expelled from the paradise of God and entered into the world of sin. Sinlessness requires grace, for a will to holiness, even when someone is without sin, requires grace in order to execute such a will. And we find, in our saved state, we will not fall into sin, so that it is thanks to grace, that our heavenly existence will itself be sinless.

[6] We can also note another way God works to save us and that is by preserving our existence – giving us the grace which unites us to his being, so that our own becoming merges with being instead of decaying and becoming annihilated. Mary, therefore, realized in all her humility that without God giving a share of his being to her, she would perish, and so was able to call God her savior just by the fact he preserved her existence in creation.

Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook:

A Little Bit of Nothing

Mary

Theology

Theotokos

Previous Post

March 3, 2016

Sodom, Gomorrah and Hell

Next Post

March 5, 2016 Marian Reflections III: Panagia, All Holy One (Part II)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz