BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian
Beliefs
- Buddhist
- Catholic
- Contemplative
- Evangelical
- General Christian
- Hindu
- Jewish
- Latter-day Saint
- More Voices
- Muslim
- New Visions
- Pagan
- Progressive Christian
Topics
- Religion News
- Food and Religion
- Sports and Religion
- Religious Art
- Religious Music and Entertainment
- Religious Events
- History and Religion
- Style and Religion
- Politics and Religion
- Women in Religion
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion
- Business Finance and Religion
- Careers Workplace and Religion
- Education and Religion
- Family Parenting and Religion
- Health Fitness and Religion
- Home and Religion
- Relationships and Religion
- Technology and Religion
- Travel and Religion
Columnists
- Buddhist Columnists
- Business Finance and Religion Columnists
- Careers Workplace and Religion Columnists
- Catholic Columnists
- Contemplative Columnists
- Education and Religion Columnists
- Evangelists Columnists
- Family Parenting and Religion Columnists
- General Christian Columnists
- Health Fitness and Religion Columnists
- Hindu Columnists
- History and Religion Columnists
- Home and Religion Columnists
- Jewish Columnists
- More Voices Columnists
- Latter Day Columnists
- Muslim Columnists
- New Visions Columnists
- Nonreligious Columnists
- Pagan Columnists
- Politics and Religion Columnists
- Progressive Columnists
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion Columnists
- Relationships and Religion Columnists
- Religion News Columnists
- Religious Art Columnists
- Religious Events Columnists
- Religious Music and Entertainment Columnists
- Sports and Religion Columnists
- Style and Religion Columnists
- Technology and Religion Columnists
- Travel and Religion Columnists
- Women in Religion Columnists
Resource Library
- 2026 Calendar
- Library of World Religions
- The 100 Most Holy Places on Earth
- Patheos Answers
- Podcasts
- Videos
- Faith Leaders Database
- Anglican Episcopalian
- Bahai
- Baptist
- Buddhism
- Christianity
- Confucianism
- Eastern Orthodoxy
- Hinduism
- Holiness and Pentecostal
- ISKCON
- Islam
- Judaism
- Lutheran
- Methodist
- The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
- New Age
- Paganism
- Presbytarian and Reformed
- Protestantism
- Religion Behind the Scenes
- Roman Catholic
- Scientology
- Shia Islam
- Sikhism
- Sufism
- Sunni Islam
- Taoism
- Zen
- See all religions
Research Tools
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- Trending:
- Forgiveness
- |
- Marriage
- |
- Consciousness
- |
- Death Penalty
- |
- Election
- |
- Halloween
- Home
- Catholic
- Marian Reflections III: Panagia, All Holy One (Conclusion)
Marian Reflections III: Panagia, All Holy One (Conclusion)
Last updated on: March 19, 2016 at 11:24 am by Henry Karlson
Marian Reflections III: Panagia, All Holy One (Conclusion) 2016-03-19T11:24:29-05:00 Henry Karlson
Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.
Icon of St Anne with Infant Mary on Wall; Photograph by Henry Karlson
This is the last part of a series reflecting on Mary as Panagia, the All Holy One. Click here for Part I , click here for Part II, click here for Part III, click here for Part IV, and click here for Part V.
Having discussed how Mary can recognize God as her savior and yet remain sinless, it is time for us to address the second question raised above, which was, how are we to interpret Paul when he said that all have sinned? If what Paul said is correct, and we must take it as such being Holy Scripture, how can we believe that Mary lived an entirely pure and blameless life? Does not Paul contradict this belief?
The solution begins to reveal itself as we put Paul’s words in context. This allows us to see what Paul intended, and makes sure we do not take a few words out of context for the sake of pretext, for it is always easy to take a few words said by anyone, and twist their intended meaning when taken in isolation. And so we read:
But now the righteousness of God has been manifested apart from law, although the law and the prophets bear witness to it, the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all who believe. For there is no distinction; since all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, they are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus, whom God put forward as an expiation by his blood, to be received by faith. This was to show God’s righteousness, because in his divine forbearance he had passed over former sins; it was to prove at the present time that he himself is righteous and that he justifies him who has faith in Jesus. Then what becomes of our boasting? It is excluded. On what principle? On the principle of works? No, but on the principle of faith. (Rom. 3:21-27 RSV).
Paul wrote to remind his audience that their justification, their holiness, comes from the grace which they receive from the sanctifying work of Jesus Christ. Therefore, no one should boast of their holiness as if it is something they accomplished all by themselves, for no one possesses such holiness in themselves. Everyone apart from grace finds themselves away from the righteousness of God. It is only when they are totally penetrated by God’s grace do they find themselves to be righteous. Thus, Paul was saying that those who had the Law of Moses and those who did not both found themselves turned away from God. All peoples, all nations, have found themselves far away from the glory of God. The Law of Moses, which was good, did not stop the people from Israel from sinning and so, like the Gentiles, they fell short of the glory of God. Israel, despite what God did for them through Moses and the Prophets, had nothing to boast about:
What then? Are we Jews any better off? No, not at all; for I have already charged that all men, both Jews and Greeks, are under the power of sin, as it is written: “None is righteous, no, not one; no one understands, no one seeks for God. All have turned aside, together they have gone wrong; no one does good, not even one” (Rom. 3:9-12 RSV).
Paul’s message, therefore, was in relation to general populations who thought, for one reason or another, that their nation or people are greater than any other. This, to be sure, was especially the case with those Jews who had become Christian. The messiah, after all, came from the Jews. Paul was reminding them that those believers who came from the Gentile populations were their equals. The Jews should not boast as if they were greater than their brothers and sisters in Christ. Thus, St. John Chrysostom, in his preaching on this chapter of the book of Romans, saw how it was about the relationship between the people of Israel and the Gentiles. He understood Paul as trying to help the people of Israel adjust to their new place in Christ. No nation was better off than any other, and so all peoples should come together in loving harmony through faith in Christ. Chrysostom therefore began his homily saying:
He had accused the Gentiles, he had accused the Jews; it came next in order to mention the righteousness which is by faith. For if the law of nature availed not, and the written Law was of no advantage, but both weighed down those that used them not aright, and made it plain that they were worthy of greater punishment, then after this the salvation which is by grace was necessary.[1]
Paul had to remind everyone of their common heritage, that all nations, even those who thought they could claim some exclusive relationship with God, failed short of the glory of God. Israel had something great with the Law of Moses, which could and did grant an element of grace to the people of Israel, but it also judged them and showed their faults to be worse than those apart from the Law because they failed to live up to the expectations of the Law of Moses. That which made them great also made them great in their failure. And so, Chrysostom continued:
Here again the Jew is alarmed by his not having anything better than the rest, and being numbered with the whole world. Now that he may not feel this, he again lowers him with fear by adding, “For there is no difference, for all have sinned.” For tell me not that it is such and such a Greek, such and such a Scythian, such and such a Thracian, for all are in the same plight. For even if you have received the Law, one thing alone is there which you have learned from the Law— to know sin, not to flee from it. Next, that they may say, “even if we have sinned, still it is not in the same way that they did,” he added, “and have come short of the glory of God.” So that even if you have not done the same sins as others, still you are alike bereft of the glory, since you belong to those who have offended, and he that has offended belongs not to such as are glorified, but to such as are put to shame. Yet, be not afraid: for the reason of my saying this was not that I might thrust you into despair, but that I might show the love of the Lord (Δεσπότου) toward man: and so he goes on…[2]
Thus, while each nation might have something special to offer to the world in and through the way God worked with them, none should find themselves better than anyone else. All peoples, all nations are equal in front of God. Everyone is equal, everyone needs God’s grace, and in and through Jesus, that grace is made available to all. Some take it and through loving fidelity to Jesus find themselves infused with grace and made righteous, while others, so long as they resist grace, continue to find themselves turned away from God. The discussion, therefore, was about the need for grace and how that need unites everyone together as they find themselves to be equal to each other in the Body of Christ. What Paul was saying here, therefore, was another way to say what he said to the Galatians: “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus” (Gal. 3:28 RSV).
As we have seen, Mary would be properly included in this need for grace, because it is in and with grace which she lived a pure life. She would be, and was, the first to acknowledge her humble position as the handmaid of the Lord (Lk. 1:38). The humility which Paul exhorted out of his audience was already realized by Mary. Her greatness was proven by her realization of how she could not be holy if she did not have the continuing presence of God in her life. And in this sense, she realized the fullness of Paul’s intent by such humility – she did not boast, she did not consider herself great, and so, as a result, without the kind of egotistical pride which closes off grace, she totally opened herself to the presence of God in her life and lived a perfectly holy life thanks to his grace.
From this, it should be clear, the claim which suggests Paul’s words in the Book of Romans indicates Mary herself had to be a sinner can only come out of a poor understanding and use of Paul’s words. Paul’s intention was to remind everyone that apart from grace, apart from the righteousness of God, we find ourselves to be sinners. If we do anything good, it is because of God’s grace and so nothing of which we should boast. Paul’s audience would have recognized and understood the point of Paul’s exhortation, for they would have experienced the contention which was driving the Jews and Gentiles apart, the contention which Paul strove to fix. They would have recognized the meaning of the text was found in the whole of the text, and not a few words taken out of context.
If there is any doubt of this, and some would still want to suggest the most literal interpretation of a few words taken out of context, all we have to do is examine the consequence of such a position. If we believe it is a necessity for all who are human to personally be indicted by sin, to have actually sinned in their lives, then Jesus, thanks to his human nature, would have to be included in that “all” and would have to be seen to be a sinner like the rest of us. That means, if we follow the verse, not for its intended meaning and use, but for the simple literal extreme some make out of it, the conclusion would be the blasphemous position that Jesus was a sinner.[3] Or if some want to deny that, then the only other conclusion, which would also be false, would be to say that Jesus was not truly human and this would be why he would not be a sinner. This secondary reply, of course, contradicts Scripture which makes it clear that Jesus was a man, indeed, that it was because he was man he was able to work for our salvation: “For there is one God, and there is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus” (1Tim. 2:5 RSV). Jesus truly was man – even as he was God, one person with two natures, and so all that is said about being man is to be said about Jesus; if it is necessary to be seen as unrighteous and a sinner to be human, then Jesus would be a sinner. But this is not the case, indeed, Paul himself made it clear in Romans that Jesus was righteous, and it was his righteousness which was able to be applied to us and make us righteous. This means the “all” was not intended to be taken in the fashion critics of Mary’s purity make it out to be. Jesus shows that there is an exception to that “all,” and Mary, because her flesh is the same flesh as the body of Christ, must also be seen as without sin, as a part of that exception, for it is her humanity which Jesus possesses, and if her humanity would be seen as impure, his would be as well.
Paul, therefore, was talking about the history of the peoples of the earth before the incarnation, and how all find themselves equal in their need for grace. He was not indicating anything about particular people and their unique walks with God; nothing he said indicted Mary herself was a sinner, though we could say she was the exception which proved the rule. She was full of grace because she was entirely open to God; she was righteous because she entirely humbled herself and let God do with her as he will without question. She is the exemplar of what it meant for human righteousness, and the goal of the Christian life. In and through her, we see not the boast of pride which tries to claim glory for itself, but the honest admittance that she does nothing apart from God, that she is holy because of God’s work in and with her. We, too, are called to be holy and can become it, thanks to grace; but if we do so, we must follow the example of Mary, who as the glory of Israel, Daughter Zion, did the will of the Father (cf. Matt. 12:50). She shows it is possible. But this is because she, like her son, saw the glory which she had was not a thing to be grasped, but a thing to be opened up to and follow in loving servitude for others.[4] To reject her and her holiness would be closing off the holiness of God from humanity, which was the farthest thing from the mind of Paul, who saw such holiness was necessary for salvation.
And so we can recognize the great thing God has done in humanity was done, in a special sense, in and through Mary. Humanity was made ready for the incarnation through the grace which was being accumulated in the line of David. Mary came forth, full of grace, the all-holy one, free to be the one to speak for us all, to say yes or no to God for all of us. If she said no, the incarnation would have had to be grounded in a new line of descent, but through her yes, the preparation for the incarnation had found its fulfillment. Through her yes, God became man and now humanity can find itself raised up in God, partaking of the divine nature for eternity. Through her yes, humanity had found its natural apex, and now, through her it can rise above itself and find itself united to God in the God-man, Jesus Christ.
[1] St. John Chrysostom, “Homilies on Romans” in NPNF2(11): 375.
[2] ibid,, 377.
[3] Such a teaching would contradict the book of Hebrews, wherein the author declared Jesus to be without sin (cf. Heb. 4:15).
[4] That is, she followed to the full what Paul wrote in the letter to the Philippians: “Do nothing from selfishness or conceit, but in humility count others better than yourselves. Let each of you look not only to his own interests, but also to the interests of others. Have this mind among yourselves, which was in Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men” (Philip. 2:3-7 RSV). She constantly emptied herself of all pretense to glory and lived a life of loving servitude in humility, giving herself over entirely to God (and through him, to all of us). This exemplified her holiness, that she did not seek to grasp after it but let it flow in and through her – for that alone is where holiness is found – any who shall try to grasp after it shall lose it, but anyone who lets it flow through them will find it elevates them to perfection, the perfection seen in Jesus and in his mother, Mary.
Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook:
A Little Bit of Nothing
Previous Post

March 18, 2016
Marian Reflections III: Panagia, All Holy One (Part V)
Next Post

March 21, 2016 Behold The Crucifixion
Browse Our Archives
Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus
Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016
Follow Us!
TAKE THE
Religious Wisdom Quiz
True or False: Boaz was Ruth's brother-in-law who married her.
Select your answer to see how you score.
TRUE FALSE
Related posts from A Little Bit of Nothing
The Unknown God Revealed In Christ
Born for This: The Nativity of Mary
What Is The Wedding Garment God Wants Us...
Jesus And Mary: Models Of Self-Emptying Love
TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic
Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action
Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...
It’s What Comes From Within Which Matters
One of the most difficult things for us to understand is why...
Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon
Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...
5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes
Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...
Credo: A Story of God Told with the...
About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...
The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought
The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...
view all Catholic blogs
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- About Us
- 2026 Calendar
- Videos
- Podcasts
- Library of World Religions
- Faith In Media Tracker
- Advertise With Us
- Write for Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms of Service
- Do Not Sell My Data
- Contact Us
- Radiant Digital
- Manage Newsletter Subscriptions
- Unsubscribe From Notifications
- Sitemap
Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.
Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In












