Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

henrykarlson

Treat Single Catholics With Respect

Last updated on: February 22, 2016 at 11:36 am   by Henry Karlson

Treat Single Catholics With Respect 2016-02-22T11:36:42-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This reflection comes out of many texts I read around St Valentine’s Day, when I read some people calling older single Catholics failures, saying such Catholics should have married young. Since they did not, they were told they were too picky, and it was their fault for being single now. Some even suggested such celibate Catholics ending up failing some sort of duty to be married and have children, and they failed because they were too selfish. There was no consideration of the possibility that it might have be no one’s “fault” but God’s actual intention that some could remain single. As such, I decided to write the following as a quick response.

We currently live in a society which encourages us to believe that everything revolves around ourselves, so that our personal likes and dislikes, our personal desires and preferences, all should determine who and what we are to do in the world. That is, if we want to be married, we should be married. If we want to be a priest, we should be a priest. If we want to be rich, we are meant to be rich and no one should get in the way of our avarice.

While there is some truth in this argument, because who we are, as a person, certainly should help determine what we do in the world, it often goes too far, and people treat us as being failures at life if we, for reasons outside of our control, do not meet our life goals or desires. Just because we desire something does not mean it is what we should have, that it is proper for us, and we should have free access to it. And even if we do not achieve it, it does not mean it was necessarily a bad desire to have. We can desire good things, for good reasons, and still desire something wrong for ourselves, something which we will never have, and yet feel the desire for it all our lives.[1]

We should neither assume a particular desire is indicative of an end which we should have, nor should we assume if we do not succeed at a particular desire our lives are failures because we have failed to follow God’s direction in our lives due to some selfish desire on our part. If we should not speak in such a way about ourselves, we should not say it about others. The Golden Rule still applies, “So whatever you wish that men would do to you, do so to them; for this is the law and the prophets” (Matt. 7:12). We do not know what God’s intention or plan is for them. We can’t force social conventions upon them and demand they follow some norms which we falsely ascribe to life, and then call them selfish or failures for failing to meet them. When we do so, we are judging them in a way which we are not to judge, in a way which we would hate to be judged and do not judge ourselves. That is, we will be finding ourselves as taking the role of God in the world, trying to impose our will upon others in a way which ignores God’s will, because we will demand them to act according to our expectations of how we think life should be instead of how God intended it for them. In this fashion, we construct a false belief about the world, and with it, about God.

This is an important for any discussion of vocations, and whether or not someone is called to be married, a priest, a member of some religious order, or even a celibate living and working in the world. God calls many to be single and in the world, and it is not selfish for them to live in the world, to work in and for it, without marrying and having children. There is no duty or requirement for Christians to marry, and indeed, St. Paul said he wished more were like him and remained celibate, but understood why marriage was also a good which could be and should be pursued by those called to it.[2]

Saint Anthony and Paul Coptic Icon: Photograph by Henry Karlson

Saint Anthony and Paul Coptic Icon: Photograph by Henry Karlson

A desire for marriage might be a sign that someone is called to marriage, but it is not necessarily the case, similar to the fact that a mere desire to be a priest is not confirmation that one is called to be a priest. Likewise, and perhaps surprising to some, a lack of desire for being married or a priest does not mean one is not called to marriage or priesthood, either. There have been many who desired not to be married who certainly were called to marriage, like St. Catherine of Genoa,[3] just as they have been many who did not desire to be priests who were made priests, like St. John Chrysostom.[4] What they realized is that a part of the Christian life is to act responsibly and act in accordance to what they think their calling was, accepting, however, that their subjective disposition itself was only a part of the equation and what happened to them in life itself revealed the other half of the equation. If they desired one thing, but another happened, they accepted what happened as God’s will, as a demonstration of God’s true calling to their life, not as an indication that they failed their vocation. Their desire, it could be said, served not as a calling, but a temptation, a kind of struggle they had to fight with, and their willingness to follow God’s revealed will over their own desire is proof of their victory against themselves. It was for their own salvation that they had such a struggle and victory, because, as St Anthony the Great said, “Without temptations no-one can be saved.” [5]

And so, we return to the question of older Catholic singles. They are not failures. They should not be seen as “bad Catholics” because only the good ones would be taken by the age they find themselves to be. Nor should they be treated as such just because they are single. They could desire to be married, seek for a partner and never find one. They should be given pastoral support to help them accept such a possibility, that their desire was not their vocation, instead of being told the problem was theirs and that they have failed to meet some sort of “duty.” They are not called to marry just anyone who comes their way, indeed, many times they are right to deny a potential mate. The case of St. Juliana, for example, demonstrates this.[6] She was betrothed to Eulogius, was the prefect of Nicoedemia, and a non-Christian. She said she would not marry him unless he became a Christian, and he refused because he feared what the emperor would do to him if he did. Her refusal was seen as a failing of her duty, and Eulogius tried to force her to marry him, with torture; when she would not relent, Eulogius had her beheaded. She was, like many other virgin martyrs, encouraged to marry a pagan to fulfill her duty to society, but like them all, she denied the duty and followed with the higher calling (all the while, in this case, willing and even possibly desiring to marry so long as the suitor was Christian).

The plight of many virgin martyrs like St Juliana was actually the first thing which came to mind when I heard the arguments that older, unmarried single Catholics living in the world had failed their duty to the world. It reminded me of many Reformation debates against celibate clergy and religious. I wondered what duty exactly did they fail? Again, there is no duty to marriage, there is no demand we are to have children. It is a vocation, a calling for some, but as it is a vocation, it is not to be forced upon those who do not have such a calling. Instead of treating those who find themselves single as second class Catholics who failed at life, or acting like they are some sort of leftovers who now do not have what it takes to be good candidates for marriage, it is time to recognize the struggle and virtues of their life, and the good they bring to the church. Instead of being treated almost like lepers, they need to be raised up, respected, given fair treatment in the church. For, if they are good and faithful Catholics, they truly have followed their calling, as well, the higher calling, the calling of a chaste life, no matter what state they find themselves to be in.[7] After all, there are many of us out there, and we are good, faithful Catholics too.


 

[1] This is one of the many lessons which we can get from St. Paul, when he talks about his thorn in the flesh:

“And to keep me from being too elated by the abundance of revelations, a thorn was given me in the flesh, a messenger of Satan, to harass me, to keep me from being too elated. Three times I besought the Lord about this, that it should leave me; but he said to me, “My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness.” I will all the more gladly boast of my weaknesses, that the power of Christ may rest upon me. For the sake of Christ, then, I am content with weaknesses, insults, hardships, persecutions, and calamities; for when I am weak, then I am strong” (2Cor. 12:7-10 RSV). There is much debate as to what that thorn was, but it does not matter. Paul desired one thing, and while it was not necessarily a bad thing to desire, and many did not suffer the thorn which he did, God did not get rid of it, instead, Paul faced it throughout his life. It encouraged him to be humble and to transcend himself by accepting the grace given to him by God.

[2] “To the unmarried and the widows I say that it is well for them to remain single as I do. But if they cannot exercise self-control, they should marry. For it is better to marry than to be aflame with passion” (1Cor. 7:8-9).

[3] St. Catherine was not too happy with her marriage, but yet, lived in and with it, trying to find a way to follow God’s will for her life which differed from her exact and desired way of life. Her husband caused her much heartache, and yet, in and through it all, she persevered, as her sainthood should help indicate.

[4] St. John Chrysostom, like many others in the early church, found the church took an active interest in his priestly vocation. He didn’t desire it, indeed, he feared it. He, as with many others, had to have the priesthood forced upon him – but once he was ordained, he followed with his vocation and wondrously lived it out.

[5] The Sayings of the Desert Fathers. trans. Benedicta Ward, SLG (Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian Publications, 1984), 2.

[6] See Bl. Jacobus de Voragine, The Golden Legend. Volume I. trans. William Granger Ryan (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993), 160-1.

[7] Secondarily, to this, there needs to be more recognition and appreciation of the single Catholics in parishes. We often find ourselves constantly treated to all kinds of blessings for married couples throughout the year, but rarely, if ever, do we find our presence recognized and given the blessings we need to help us in our present state, whether or not it will prove to be our final vocation or not.

 

Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook:

A Little Bit of Nothing

Singlehood

Vocations

Singlehood

Vocation

Previous Post



February 21, 2016

Marian Reflections II: Mother of God (Part II)

Next Post



February 24, 2016 The Triumph of the Cross


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who touched Jesus' cloak and was healed of bleeding?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jairus' daughter A woman in the crowd Martha A centurion

Related posts from A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

It’s What Comes From Within Which Matters

A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

How Tradition Points Away From The Death Penalty

A Little Bit of Nothing

Catholic

The Incarnation And The Christian Use Of Images

A Little Bit of Nothing

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

It’s What Comes From Within Which Matters

One of the most difficult things for us to understand is why...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought

The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube