Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
After Aquinas, Palamas

After Aquinas, Palamas

Last updated on: February 18, 2016 at 12:44 pm by Henry Karlson

After Aquinas, Palamas 2016-02-18T12:44:52-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The Sun of Righteousness, the Burning Flame of Divine Love, Imagined by the Sun
Photograph by Henry Karlson

In my previous post, I talked about how good followers of St. Thomas Aquinas should not feel confined to the letter of Aquinas’ writings, but rather, like Aquinas himself, put whatever was imperfect, the straw of conventions, to the fire, and emerge with the spirit that gives life, that is, to seek after the real core meaning of his teachings and not let the convention used to explain it get in the way of the truth[1]. What is true for Aquinas is not only true for Aquinas, but for all theology and theological exploration. The words employed in theological writings serve a purpose, they propose and point to a meaning which transcends the words used; once their meaning is understood, the words can be used or discarded, or radically modified, according to need. And if they get in the way of others understanding the truth, then it can be appropriate to discard the words, put the straw into the fire, without looking back.

This is an important way out of many theological controversies. We must recognize that behind the words used is a spirit, a teaching, a belief, which is agreed upon by all sides of an argument. Not all theological disagreements, of course, can be solved this way. Words do matter, and what they point to does matter – they do serve as a vehicle to a particular end, and if the ends differ, then it is not just a debate over words, and more needs to be done than “put the words to the flame.” But for many debates, where people are arguing with each other but pointing to the same truth or reality, then the words or conventions themselves do not need to be obstinately held on to, but let go so the unity can be found once again. Sadly, when one or both sides of a debate do not properly understand the conventions used by the other, instead of putting the words to the flame, their tempers flare up, and the debate soon lacks charity, and despite actual unity in belief, they split off from each other, with each side often reifying their own conventions as the end result. They become more concerned in proving and following the letter which they established, including the subtle distinctions which develop from it, than the truth originally meant by it.

A key example of this can be seen in the theological debates that the West and East have had over “created” and “uncreated” grace, with the West, following Aquinas, focusing on “created grace,” while the East, following St. Gregory Palamas, talk about “uncreated grace.” The conventions seem to suggest the theological views between the two traditions are in dispute, leading many in the West and the East fighting against each other, thinking there can be no unity between the two. And yet if the conventions were left out of it, that is, if they were put to the flames, and the meaning intended behind each convention was brought forth instead, the general agreement that lay behind the conventions could be found, and that could be the foundation for unity.

For St. Thomas, there are two considerations. First, grace comes from God and enters the soul, and as such, it is substantial in God as divine goodness but comes to the soul as an accident:

And because grace is above human nature, it cannot be a substance or a substantial form, but is an accidental form of the soul. Now what is substantially in God, becomes accidental in the soul participating the Divine goodness, as is clear in the case of knowledge. And thus because the soul participates in the Divine goodness imperfectly, the participation of the Divine goodness, which is grace, has its being in the soul in a less perfect way than the soul subsists in itself.[2]

Thus, St. Thomas Aquinas tells us, when looking at the way the soul interacts with grace, it is clear the soul can either cooperate with it, allowing its bounty to lead the soul from corruption to incorruption, or it can close itself off from grace, and find itself remaining defective from the corruption of sin. When grace encounters the soul, it can be seen, as it were, as a created effect:

And because to become and to be corrupted belong to what is, properly speaking, no accident comes into being or is corrupted, but is said to come into being and to be corrupted inasmuch as its subject begins or ceases to be in act with this accident. And thus grace is said to be created inasmuch as men are created with reference to it, i.e. are given a new being out of nothing, i.e. not from merits, according to Ephesians 2:10, “created in Jesus Christ in good works.”[3]

St. Gregory Palamas, on the other hand, discusses grace as being uncreated because God is uncreated, meaning he is eternal and unchanging and so his actions (energia) are eternal. Grace, as an activity of God, must be a part of the eternal, unchanging activity of God; as such it cannot be seen as created, for creation is predicated to that which is changeable. Moreover, connected to this theme, Palamas also points out that the activities of Go are linked to God himself, inseparable from his essence, so that where there is grace, there is God, which once again then suggests why grace has to be uncreated, for God is uncreated. From all of this, Palamas talks about how we relate to grace, allowing us to participate in the divine life through it, realizing, however, there remains a logical distinction between the energia of God with his essence:

Because both the divine essence and the divine energy are everywhere inseparably present, God’s energy is accessible also to us creatures; for, according to the theologians, it is indivisibly divided, whereas the divine nature, they say, remains totally undivided. Thus St John Chrysostom says, ‘A drop of grace filled all things with knowledge; through it miracles were wrought and sins forgiven.’ Here, while indicating that this drop of grace is uncreated, he hastens to make it clear that it is an energy of God but not His essence.[4]

Palamas, following his own understanding of the activity or energia of God as being uncreated, with grace being one such activity, therefore calls out those who talk about created grace, suggesting that such language is blasphemous (thereby establishing through such words, the conflict that continues in some circles between the West and the East). For Palamas, grace must always be seen as undivided from God. “All these things, then, are emanations and manifestations and powers and activities of that one divinity; they are with the divinity in a physical and inseparable fashion.”[5] The person of the Holy Spirit which dispenses such grace would then be created if grace is created, which is why Palamas claims such talk is blasphemous:

What are we to say, then, of course who regard the grace that dwells in God’s saints as created? Let them know that they blaspheme against the Spirit himself who, in giving His grace, is united to the saints.[6]

We see, therefore, St. Gregory Palamas was interested in grace, more as it relates to God and continues to be united with God, while St. Thomas Aquinas was interested in the subjective experience of said grace. Theologically, St. Thomas Aquinas, by calling such grace in God as the substantial good in God, he was always implying its proper, uncreated nature, that it reflects the goodness we find in God. But for St. Thomas, the interest and concern was for how grace is experienced in us, and as it is an experience which changes over time, as we cooperate with grace, then it is added to us and becomes, as it were, an action in time and therefore “created.” The grace as it is in God remains the same, the same eternal goodness of God, but our experience with the unchanging activity of God is in time, and so his actions seem to be creating new effects within the realm of becoming. The debate, therefore, is over conventions, which are not absolutes, and are similar to debates we find as to how Scripture and its conventions are to be interpreted. When God is said to repent in Scripture,[7] orthodox theological interpretations point out that it is only the appearance of a change of mind in God to those reacting to God’s actions in relation to creation: the one eternal act remains the same, but in the realm of becoming, it is experienced in relation to that becoming and not in accordance to God’s being. Thus, in being able to understand “repentance” or metanoia or change of mind in God in a conventional sense, in relation to our temporal changing experience of our relationship with God, so we can understand “created grace” as reflective of the way grace is experienced by us in time, and not as to what grace is by its nature.

The debate over grace therefore came, not out a difference in ultimate beliefs, but through the conventions used for such discussions. How and why those conventions were employed suggests an actual agreement between the sides. They agree that the one, uncreated nature of God and is of one uncreated and therefore eternal activity. But, the conventions became the means by which a lack of charity was to be played out, creating contention when it need not be there. St. Gregory Palamas certainly can be seen to have a share of the blame here, because he was more than a little hostile to the conventions used in the West. Thus, St. Gregory Palamas, like all great and holy theologians, has much to offer, but in his offering, the truth in it needs to be purified from what external straw used to explain it get in the way of the truth. His works needs the same purifying flame as Aquinas – we follow him in and with accordance to the intention and meaning of his words, without having to get caught in the externals, thinking one form of conventions alone is justified. His reading of the West was uncharitable, and such a lack, therefore, goes to the flames, allowing his work and contribution, which is great, to come out and useful for all. But this also means that the West also needs to do the same with Thomas and their tradition: recognize the truth contained in his words, and not focus on the words itself. They are the straw Aquinas was willing to toss to the flame.

And so, if both sides can and will do this, not just on the nature of grace, but on so many forms of dissention which keeps the West and East divided, the burning fire of love, God, can bring them back together as one. Let us pray that the day is soon to come!

[1] In this respect, theology itself can be seen a work which will be tried and tested; when it is founded upon the truth, the coarse letter will be put to the fire, and the truth will remain, as per 1 Cor. 3:11-15.

[2] St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica. trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province (New York: Benziger Brothers, 1948), I-II.110.2.

[3] St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica, I-II.110.2.

[4] St. Gregory Palamas, “Topics of Natural and Theological Science and on the Moral and Ascetic Life: One Hundred and Fifty Texst,” in The Philokalia: Volume IV. trans. and ed. G.E. H. Palmer, Philip Sherrard, Kallistos Ware, et. al. (London: Faber and Faber, 1995),380.

[5] St. Gregory Palamas, Dialogue Between and Orthodox and a Barlaamite. trans. Rein Ferwerda (Binghamton, NY: Global Publications/CEMERS, 1999), 67. When reading this text here, it is clear we already have a convention which needs to be put to the flames, the notion that we can speak of God in a “physical” manner. Certainly the notion implied by it is understandable, but if we followed the convention to its proper end, it would lead to a notion of God which Palamas himself clearly rejects.

[6] St. Gregory Palamas, “To the Most Reverend Nun Xenia,” in The Philokalia: Volume IV. trans. and ed. G.E. H. Palmer, Philip Sherrard, Kallistos Ware, et. al. (London: Faber and Faber, 1995), 322

[7] See, for example, Gen. 6:6 and Ex. 32:14.

Stay in touch! Like A Little Bit of Nothing on Facebook:

A Little Bit of Nothing

Previous Post

February 16, 2016

Follow Aquinas: Put His Works to the Flame

Next Post

February 20, 2016 Marian Reflections II: Mother of God (Part I)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abraham abuse Aesthetics AI Aliens Ambrose Ancestors and Everything Andrew Angels Animals Anne Anthony Antisemitism apologetics Apophatic Apostle John Aquinas Artificial Intelligence Asanga Ascension Asceticism Assumption Atheism Attachment Augustine Authority Avarice Balthasar Baptism Beauty Biden birthright citizenship Bishops Black History Books Buddhism Bulgakov Byzantine Calendar C.S. Lewis Calcidius Catholic Catholicism Catholicism Celibacy Charity Chastity children Chrismation Christ Christmas Christology Church Climate Change Common Good Communion Confession Confirmation Conscience Constantine conventions conversion councils Covid Creation Cross Dead Death Death Penalty Debate Deception Demagogues Demons Desert Monks Desert Mothers Desire destruction development Dialogue Dignity Dionsyius Dionysius Discipline Diversity Division Doctor Who doctrine dogma Dormition Dualism Easter Easter Series Ecumenical Councils Ecumenism Education Election Empathy Environment Error Eschatology eschaton Eternity Ethics Eucharist Evangelism Eve Evil evolution Faeries Faith Fear femininity Ficino Florence Florensky Folktale Fools Forgiveness Freedom Future gender Gentile Gentiles Glory Gnostic God gods Good Samaritan Goodness Gospel Government Grace Great Fast Guns Hate healing Health Heaven Hell Hellenism Heresy Hierarchy Hildegard Hinduism History Holiness Holy Spirit Holy Week Hope Horror Human rights humanity Humility hypocrisy ICE icon icons Identification Identity Idol II Nicea Immigration incarnation Individualism Informal Reflections Inklings Intention Inter-Religious Interfaith Internet Interpretation Intrinsic evil Irenaeus Islam Israel Jacob Jerome Jesus Jews John Chrysostom John of Damascus John the Baptist Joseph Judaism justice Justification kenosis Kindnesss Kingdom of God Kingdom of Heaven Law Law of Moses Lazarus Leaf by Niggle Lent Lenten Reflection Liberation Theology Lies Life Listen Literature Liturgy locutions Logic Logos Love Marriage Martyrs Mary Mass Maximos The Confessor Meanness Meditation Mercy Middle Path Migrants Mind Miracles Miriam Morals Moses Movies Music Muslims Myths Names Nationalism Native Americans New Year Nicea Nicholas Nothing Novatian Obedience Occam's Razor Ordination Origen Original Sin Orthodox orthopraxis Pagans Palamas Palm Sunday Paradise Paschaltide Paul Peace Pentecost person Peter piety PKD Plato pluralism Plurality Poem Poetry Poiltics Politics Poor Pope Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV Post Office Prayer Pride Pro-life Prodigal Son propaganda Prophecy Prophets Providence Putin Racism Reading Reason Reflection Refugees Relationships Religion Religion Series Religious Liberty Repent Republicans Rest Resurrection Rich Rites Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation Salvian Santa Science Scripture Self-Giving Sexuality Sibyl Sick Silence Sin Singlehood Social Justice Society Sodom Solovyov Speculations Spiritual Reflection St. Cyril of Alexandria St. Justin Martyr Suffering Sunday of the Paralytic Man Sunday of the Samaritan Woman Superhero Supreme Court Teaching Technology Thanksgiving The Father the Universe Theological Reflection Theology Theosis Theotokos Thomas Timaeus Time Tolerenace Tolkien Tradition Transfiguration Trinity Trump Truth Uncategorized Unity Universities USCCB Value Vatican II Vegetarian Vices Violence Virtue Vocations War Water Welcome Wisdom Womanhood Women Work World View Worship Writing Zacchaeus

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz