Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Hedgerow

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
California churches ongoing court battles against Gov. Gavin Newsom allege repeated, targeted discrimination [video]

California churches ongoing court battles against Gov. Gavin Newsom allege repeated, targeted discrimination [video]

Last updated on: October 27, 2020 at 10:00 am by Bethany Blankley

California churches ongoing court battles against Gov. Gavin Newsom allege repeated, targeted discrimination [video] 2020-10-26T13:35:11-05:00 Bethany Blankley

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Of the roughly 32 lawsuits that have been filed since March against California Gov. Gavin Newsom, many allege his executive orders violate the religious liberty clauses of the California Constitution.

Twenty-two active cases address religious freedom violations, education policies, forced closures of businesses, alleged violations of federal and state laws, and grievances by landlords. At least 10 of the 32 have been dropped or ruled on; some of the 22 active cases have been amended since their initial filing.

Some of the most prominent cases are playing out in the Fifth, Sixth, Seventh and Ninth Circuit Appeals Courts.

Two of the first, and pending, religious freedom cases were filed in April. Gish v Newsom, and San Diego-based Abiding Place Ministries v Newsom, allege that his orders violate the provisions of the state constitution that protect freedom of speech, freedom of religion, right to assemble, and due process.

South Bay United Pentecostal Church sued Newsom May 8 after Newsom announced his Phase 2 reopening plan (which has since been changed). Joining South Bay was the Chabad of Carmel Valley synagogue in San Diego. The plaintiffs allege the revised order restricted their congregation’s rights to free exercise of religion, to assemble, to free speech, and due process.

On May 22, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals refused to strike down Newsom’s statewide order. The case went to the U.S. Supreme Court, and on May 29, U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts agreed with the lower court. Because of the coronavirus, Roberts said the governor’s order “should not be subject to second-guessing by an ‘unelected federal judiciary,’ which lacks the background, competence, and expertise to assess public health and is not accountable to the people.”

Liberty Counsel Founder and Chairman Mat Staver said the only good news about the ruling was that it was not based on the merits of the case but on the emergency request to circumvent Newsom’s rules, and it did not affect other religious entities.

There is currently a split among judges based on the merits of the case in the lower courts. Judges in the Ninth and Seventh Circuit Courts of Appeals have denied emergency relief requests, whereas judges in the Fifth and the Sixth Circuits have granted emergency relief requests.

None of the lower court decisions are final, as they will result in petition filed with the U.S. Supreme Court, Staver notes, which ultimately needs to settle the matter of religious liberty once and for all.

In late May, Newsom eased restrictions on religious gatherings, but then nearly eliminated them again in early July. His worship ban prohibiting “indoor singing and chanting activities” prompted South Bay United and Chabad of Carmel Valley to submit a revised complaint July 17.

Other lawsuits have been filed over the worship ban, including Calvary Chapel of Ukiah, which sued Newsom and state and county public health officials July 5. They allege the ban violates their right to free exercise of religion and speech, and discriminates against religious worship.

Sean Feucht, a worship leader at Bethel Church who leads several non-profits in Northern California, created the viral “Let Us Worship” petition, explaining why he was defying the orders. He posted images of him leading “illegal worship” in Iraq in 2016, in North Korea in 2010, and in California since July, on Instagram.

“We’ve spent the last 20 years mobilizing worship in places where it is illegal. Never in my life would I believe that it would be California in 2020,” Feucht said.

Rev. Samuel Rodriguez, a member of the National COVID-19 Recovery Commission, asked in several social media posts:

“How can you permit, not for one day, but for many days, tens of thousands to march in protest without wearing masks and then demand that 100 worshipers refrain from singing?”

Harvest Rock Church and its international ministries sued Newsom July 17, and in October requested the entire Ninth Circuit panel to review its case.

Harvest Rock Church has multiple campuses in California, including in Pasadena, Los Angeles, Irvine and Corona; its international ministry has 162 member churches statewide. They allege the governor’s restrictions violate their right to religious expression, to assemble, to free speech, to equal protection under the law, and to have a “republican form of government.”

While the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 against granting an injunction pending appeal in Harvest’s case, it did agree to hear the merits of its request in a hearing to be scheduled next year.

Newsom Blueprint for reopening, a revision of previous reopening guidelines, which critics argue continues to change criteria, established a system of four Tiers. Plaintiffs suing Newsom argue the Blueprint discriminates “against religious meetings in churches and places of worship in every Tier.”

In Tier 1, (in which Harvest Church and its ministries are designated), the governor prohibits all indoor worship services, including home Bible studies involving anyone who does not live in the home where the study is being held.

“From the first stay-at-home order in March to the present, Gov. Newsom has allowed feeding, sheltering, and nonreligious counseling with an unlimited number of people in the same church building, but religious gatherings are either banned or severely restricted,” Liberty Counsel argues.

In Tiers 2 and 3, churches can have no more than 100 and 200 people attending a service, no matter how large the building is or how many people it can hold. But gyms, fitness centers, museums, family entertainment centers, retail, shopping malls, big box centers, warehouses, destination centers, swap meets, and others are have no prohibitions on how many can assemble inside their respective buildings, according to the Blueprint.

The Blueprint “reveals a clear discrimination against religious gatherings,” Staver adds. “California cannot give preferential treatment to nonreligious meetings over religious meetings. The virus does not discriminate between nonreligious and religious meetings, but Gov. Newsom does. This discrimination violates the First Amendment.”

Christianity

politics

California Constitution

Previous Post

October 26, 2020

UVA Health threatens to discipline, suspend, fire employee who refuses to get flu vaccine

Next Post

October 27, 2020 Barna Research: pastors silent on political issues despite congregants wanting them to speak up [videos]

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Christianity Islam politics Sexuality transgender Uncategorized

Select a Month January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 October 2019 September 2019 July 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 June 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 October 2016 July 2016 June 2016 April 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who baptizes Jesus?

Select your answer to see how you score.

John the Baptist Joseph God the Father Joshua