PJI appeals to Ninth Circuit over Salinas officials targeting New Harvest Christian Fellowship

Last updated on: June 25, 2020 at 10:16 am by Bethany Blankley

PJI appeals to Ninth Circuit over Salinas officials targeting New Harvest Christian Fellowship 2020-06-25T10:16:03-05:00 Bethany Blankley

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The Pacific Justice Institute (PJI) has appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals after a lower court ruled that a church can be restricted in how it uses private property by a city.

New Harvest Christian Fellowship has rented space on Main Street in Salinas for more than 25 years.

Now roughly a congregation of 165 people, the church has outgrown its space. Its traditional worship services held on Sunday mornings is held in the building it rents but children who participate in Sunday school and children’s church services are required to leave the building and meet at a nearby dance studio– Dance Arts Studio Jeanne Robinson– located on Monterey St.

New Harvest Christian Fellowship, founded in 1981 by Pastor Richard and Yvonne Gallardo, has also helped plant churches in California: Union City (1985), Seaside (1986), Hollister (1988), Greenfield (1990), and San Jose (1991). New Harvest has also planted churches in Mexico in 1990, Santiago, Chile (1995), and six congregations in West Africa.

The church has been very much involved in the life of downtown Salinas, supporting community outreach programs, including providing meals to the needy at a local warming shelter, providing food and clothes to residents of China Town, and hosting family carnivals at various parks in the city.

After purchasing a larger building across the street from where it had been meeting in 2018, the city of Salinas implemented sharp restrictions for how the church could use the space. The city restricted how the church could use the second floor, and required it to create a dedicated retail space on the ground floor to an extent that was unworkable for them. A few feet down the street, city officials permitted theaters and live entertainment venues to operate without similar restrictions.

PJI sued, arguing the city violated the federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. In late May, District Court Judge Susan Van Keulen ruled that Harvest Christian Fellowship, and churches in general, generate limited interest to the public, do not draw tourists, and therefore detract from the city’s goals of “vibrancy.”

The court ruled that the city was justified in promoting a “street of fun,” which prioritizes concert and entertainment venues, yet also includes nursing homes and post offices.

“Salinas deems churches as less deserving of equal treatment under the law than the live children’s theatre, two cinemas, and event center that share the City’s downtown corridor with New Harvest Fellowship,” Kevin Snider, PJI’s Chief Counsel and lead attorney for the case, argues. “Salinas’ zoning policy seeks to promote a lively pedestrian-friendly street scene by clearing out street-level religious assemblies. Since the lower court’s decision, ironically downtown Salinas has experienced a lively pedestrian street scene in the form of protests. Those types of assemblies may not be the fun City officials were hoping for to replace churches.”

“This continues to be one of the most striking examples of unequal treatment of a church in the land use context that we have seen in the past 20 years,” Brad Dacus, president of PJI, said.

The church argues that “a local congregation is more than a legal entity that provides religious activities,” according to the complaint. A church congregation “is comprised of people who come together to form one body with Jesus Christ as its head. Those who come to church come to “worship God, seek fellowship with each other, and perform acts of religious service also known as ministry.”
The complaint adds,

“The absence of people turned away because of lack of space during service results in the infliction of suffering in the body. The absence of these worshippers is, in a profound theological sense, a substantial burden on the religious practices of gathering together as one body for worship, fellowship and ministry.

“Turning worshippers away creates a substantial burden on the religious exercise of the church in its proselytizing efforts. In addition to engaging in activities which edify the believers who attend the worship services, many who are turned away are visitors to the church who are not Christians. These have been invited by congregants or come on their own because they are seeking spiritual help.”

By not allowing the church to meet in its space, the city is preventing non-members of the church from receiving help– and help they haven’t found anywhere else– through acts of service offered freely by church members, and through the sharing of the gospel.

In 2010, PJI won a similar case against the city of San Leandro brought by Faith Fellowship Church, which resulted in a $2.3 million payout by the city, according to Monterey County Weekly.

Christianity

politics

New Harvest Christian Fellowship

PJI

Salinas

Previous Post

June 17, 2020

Catholic Priests and Orthodox Jewish Congregants Sue New York Governor in Federal Court For Civil Rights Violations

Next Post

June 28, 2020 Cuomo, de Blasio wrong to limit worship services, federal judge rules

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Christianity Islam politics Sexuality transgender Uncategorized

Select a Month January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 October 2019 September 2019 July 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 June 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 October 2016 July 2016 June 2016 April 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was sold into slavery by his brothers?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Joseph David Moses Solomon