Minnesota churches seek temporary restraining order to halt governor’s executive order

Last updated on: May 18, 2020 at 4:03 pm by Bethany Blankley

Minnesota churches seek temporary restraining order to halt governor’s executive order 2020-05-18T16:03:59-05:00 Bethany Blankley

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Another motion was filed on behalf of Minnesota churches requesting a temporary restraining order to suspend enforcement of Democratic Governor Tim Walz’s continued ban of churches holding in-person services.

The Upper Midwest Law Center, a Minnesota-based public interest law firm, which filed the motion, represents multiple Minnesota churches and small business owners in a lawsuit alleging the governor’s executive order is unconstitutional.

The motion was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota, with an expedited hearing expected to be held within 10 days.

“Governor Walz’s newest version of his unilateral emergency shutdown order continues to violate the First Amendment by treating religious organizations as second class citizens,” Doug Seaton, Esq., President of the Upper Midwest Law Center, said in a prepared statement. “While no more than 10 attendees are permitted at any religious service, the governor’s new executive order allows virtually all retail businesses to open as long as their capacity is under 50% of maximum. So while it will now be easy once again to go shopping for home furnishings or new clothes on a Sunday, you still are not allowed to attend church, temple or mosque, even though those religious organizations are able to comply with exactly the same public health guidelines. It is clearly unconstitutional for the governor to allow people to go to the Mall of America but not Living Word Christian Center.”

Howard Root, Chair of the Upper Midwest Law Center, added that, “The First Amendment requires Governor Walz allow church services to operate according to the same public health guidelines he applies to secular activities in similar situations. Our motion for temporary restraining order on behalf of religious clients seeks an interim suspension of Governor Walz’s continuing shutdown on religious activities while our original lawsuit on behalf of multiple small businesses and religious organizations for permanent relief and compensation continues to progress through the court system.”

In recent cases filed by churches against a governor’s overreach, judges granted a restraining order on governors’ respective executive orders related to religious liberty in the states of Kentucky, North Carolina and Washington.

Previous Post

May 13, 2020

Rev. Danny Jones gives one of the best explanations about the coronavirus shutdown in roughly 30 min. [videos]

Next Post

June 11, 2020 Calls from members of Congress, Bishops, doctors, to not use aborted baby tissue for coronavirus, other vaccines, falls on deaf ears

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Christianity Islam politics Sexuality transgender Uncategorized

Select a Month January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 October 2019 September 2019 July 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 June 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 October 2016 July 2016 June 2016 April 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Satan" mean in Hebrew?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Deceiver Adversary Murderer Destroyer