Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Hedgerow

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
Foghorn Alert #1: The message of Luke 2:13-23 on racial reconciliation, “the fairly dark skinned” Mary and baby Jesus, and not pledging allegiance to the American flag

Foghorn Alert #1: The message of Luke 2:13-23 on racial reconciliation, “the fairly dark skinned” Mary and baby Jesus, and not pledging allegiance to the American flag

Last updated on: January 28, 2020 at 12:52 pm by Bethany Blankley

Foghorn Alert #1: The message of Luke 2:13-23 on racial reconciliation, “the fairly dark skinned” Mary and baby Jesus, and not pledging allegiance to the American flag 2020-01-28T12:52:00-05:00 Bethany Blankley

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Foghorn Alert #1: The message of Luke 2:13-23 on racial reconciliation, “the fairly dark skinned” Mary and baby Jesus, and not pledging allegiance to the American flag

Denomination and location: ECO-A Covenant Order of Evangelical Presbyterians, Houston, Texas

One poor sermon does not adequately depict one’s ability to teach or expound the text; this is one of several messages I’ve heard from this speaker. While I do appreciate what appears to be his genuine willingness to serve, it may prove beneficial for the church to identify where he can best serve outside of the pulpit.

The Luke 2 text read by congregants describes King Herod’s order to kill male boys under age two. An Angel of the Lord told Joseph to take Mary and baby Jesus and flee to Egypt for safety.

We next watched a video about a racial reconciliation conference and were encouraged to attend it.

When listening to the message it became clear that instead of hearing why God wanted baby Jesus to be saved or something about angels related to the series entitled, the “Angels of Advent,” we heard what Spurgeon describes as mist in the pulpit.

One of the most notable misstatements made emphasized skin color and race. The speaker said, “In order to escape to Egypt, Joseph, Mary and Jesus would have needed to be able to blend in with the Egyptians, which means its very likely that they had fairly dark skin. … They are brown, not white.”

He then showed an image of a black woman and child that he received from the City of Refuge Church’s Christmas newsletter, and said, “and I love it!” The image was created by Anthony VanArsdale for the National Black Catholic Congress (NBCC), a congress that segregates itself by skin color, which appears to represent the opposite of “racial reconciliation” and the message of the gospel which knows no racial, ethnic or geographic bounds.

The image accompanies NBCC’s website post for Jan. 1 called, “Octave of Christmas and Solemnity of Mary, Mother of God (Holy Day of Obligation).” Accompanying the image is the Catechism of the Catholic Church 721: “Mary, the all-holy ever-virgin Mother of God, is the masterwork of the mission of the Son and the Spirit in the fullness of time. For the first time in the plan of salvation and because his Spirit had prepared her, the Father found the dwelling place where his Son and his Spirit could dwell among men. In this sense the Church’s Tradition has often read the most beautiful texts on wisdom in relation to Mary. Mary is acclaimed and represented in the liturgy as the ‘Seat of Wisdom.’”

Screenshot of NBCC homepage Jan. 1, 2020.

It is hard to believe that a church that is evangelical protestant and Presbyterian in name would use a Roman Catholic icon to illustrate the Luke 2 text. One need only read The Westminster Shorter Catechism (Question 22) to learn why exalting Mary “is utterly false, and against the honor of God.”

Furthermore, it appears that the speaker does not understand racial biological classification. Joseph, Mary and Jesus were not brown or black African, as depicted by the icon. Yet he stated as fact that they were “brown not white.”

In general, Middle Eastern people have olive skin tones, as do their surrounding neighbors, including many Egyptians living on the northeastern coast of Africa. If Mary and Joseph “were very dark skinned,” similar to the picture of the black Mary and Jesus depicted by NBCC, they most probably would have stood out in Egypt (and Israel). More importantly, none of this has anything to do with the text of Luke 2.

He then segued into saying that there “were probably more than three wise men.” (The Bible doesn’t mention there were three wise men, only that the wise men presented three gifts (gold, frankincense and myrrh).)

In the context of wise men worshipping Jesus, he said, “I don’t pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States. I pledge allegiance to Jesus Christ!” The presupposition is that one cannot possibly do both, when in fact we can and do.

One has to wonder what would cause anyone to think that saying the Pledge of Allegiance equates to not following Jesus or that following Jesus means one cannot say this pledge.

The Bible does not prohibit anyone from taking an oath to a country, to give testimony in court, to join a military service, or to serve in a professional vocation. All are common practices in the U.S. The Pledge of Allegiance does not require anyone to take it, nor does it require anyone to deny his or her beliefs to do so.

It also appears that the speaker ignored the teachings of Paul in Romans 13 about civil government, and is unfamiliar with the Presbyterian doctrine explaining the scripture on lawful oaths and vows and the role of the civil magistrate. Wouldn’t it have been more useful for him to refer to the teachings of The Westminster Confession of Faith sections XXII, XXXIII, and XXXI on the matter, instead of searching online to find the answer, as he said he did?

Ironically, by inserting the issue of race and skin color into the text, he ignored the actual racial violence that occurred just hours before he gave the message.

Less than 24 hours before the service, a black man used a machete to brutally attack Rabbi Chaim Rottenberg in New York. Prior to that a four-hour police shoot out occurred in Jersey City, New Jersey, after two black gunmen killed six Jews while attacking a Kosher market. Prior to that, a Jewish student at Barnard was brutally murdered by a black man. Prior to that, a black woman attacked three Orthodox Jewish women in Brooklyn, New York.

All made national news. All attacks were unprovoked. All of the victims were unarmed. And they were just a few only occurring in New York and New Jersey.

Yet I have not heard one black evangelical leader who has publicly spoken out against continued Jew-hatred in the U.S. I did not hear a single black congregant or leader at this church mentioned the attack of Jews by blacks, or ask to pray about the fact that Jews are the No.1 victims of religiously-motivated hate crimes in the U.S.

The worst part about the message is what was left out: why baby Jesus was saved. The preservation of his life was to fulfill God’s redemptive plan: Jesus had to live a life of perfect obedience to God in order to atone for our sins.

In Matthew 1:21 the angel told Joseph, “Do not be afraid to take Mary home as your wife, because what is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. She will give birth to a son and you are to give him Jesus because, he will save his people from their sins.” (Emphasis added.)

Whenever we hear someone in authority from a church who doesn’t actually teach what the Bible says, and says something that isn’t in the Bible, or appears to promote a “racial” agenda, we must remember Spurgeon’s analogy, “If there is mist in the pulpit there is a fog in the pew.”

This foghorn alert seeks do that by encouraging us to remember what the purpose of preaching is—and—is not, and to encourage us to avoid sitting in fog.

Learn more about the Foghorn Series.

ECO-A Covenant Order of Evangelical Presbyterians

Foghorn series

Luke 2

Previous Post

January 23, 2020

Should taxpayer money fund religious schools? Supreme Court to finally decide.

Next Post

February 6, 2020 What does it mean to be content?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Christianity Islam politics Sexuality transgender Uncategorized

Select a Month January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 October 2019 September 2019 July 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 June 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 October 2016 July 2016 June 2016 April 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which prophet confronted David about his sin with Bathsheba?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Abiathar Gad Samuel Nathan