When Saying No to the Government Could Mean the End of Your Ministry [video]

Last updated on: February 13, 2020 at 1:19 pm by Bethany Blankley

When Saying No to the Government Could Mean the End of Your Ministry [video] 2020-02-13T13:19:18-05:00 Bethany Blankley

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In addition to the federal government funding abortion, state governments are requiring pro-life pregnancy centers, healthcare professionals, doctors, and Christian ministries to promote and advertise information about having an abortion– or receive hefty fines and ultimately close.

For example, a recent Hawaiian mandate requires pro-life pregnancy centers, including those run by churches and Christian organizations, to promote and advertise abortion coverage on a website. Fortunately, the Christian organization, Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), filed a lawsuit on behalf of the pro-life ministry, A Place for Women in Waipoi, and five other pregnancy resource centers affiliated with the National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA).

In Illinois, a recently enacted law required pro-life healthcare professionals and doctors to refer or help refer their patients to abortionists. They also were required to advise their patients about the benefits of abortion as a “treatment option” for pregnancy. Last December, a state circuit court placed a preliminary injunction on the law, affirming the position expressed by ADF Senior Counsel, Matt Bowman:

Forcing pro-life doctors and pregnancy care centers in Illinois to operate as referral agents for the abortion industry in violation of their freedom of conscience is unconstitutional, illegal, and unethical. No state has the authority to compel health professionals, against their will and their sacred oath to “do no harm,” to promote abortion. We commend the court’s ruling which is a victory for free speech and the freedom of conscience.

Similar to Illinois, courts in Austin, Texas, Montgomery County and Baltimore, Maryland, and New York City, invalidated laws that violated the constitutionally protected rights of pro-life healthcare providers, doctors, clinic workers and those involved in Christian ministry.

But one court case is going all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, courtesy of the communist-run state of California.

The Reproductive FACT Act, AB 775, requires pro-life pregnancy centers to advertise for Planned Parenthood and the abortion industry, or be fined. It requires pro-life licensed medical centers to disclose information about the state’s free and low-cost abortion and contraception services, including contact information for a county office that refers women to Planned Parenthood. Unlicensed pregnancy centers are also required to prominently disclose their “non-medical status” even though they do not provide medical services.

A federal court upheld the law, and refused to rehear it last year. As a result, pro-life medical centers in Los Angeles, California are being fined a minimum of $500 per instance of not promoting abortion or referring women to Planned Parenthood.

On November 13, 2017, the Supreme Court announced it would hear the case, National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra, in which one pro-life pregnancy care center network and two pregnancy care centers in California claim that the law violates their constitutionally protected rights to freedom of conscience and free speech.

If pro-life individuals are forced to support abortion in the workplace, ministry, or volunteer capacity, they are left with four choices. 1) They can comply, and go against their conviction to save lives. 2) They can not comply and be repeatedly fined to the point of losing their ministry. 3) They can pursue legal action to preserve their rights protected by the U.S. Constitution. 4) Or they can abandon their commitment to pro-life advocacy and assistance to women in need altogether. In many instances, Christians have resorted to the second and third options.

Fortunately, the ADF and those who support protecting constitutional rights have come to the aid of Christians who maintain that the right to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness rests in the freedom to first be born– free from torture, dismemberment, or murder.

Christianity

politics

A Place for Women in Waipoi

abortion

Alliance Defending Freedom

National Institute of Family and Life Advocates

pro-life

Supreme Court

Previous Post

November 10, 2017

This Sunday Celebrate the International Day of the Bible

Next Post

December 10, 2017 This 5-Year-Old Texas Shooting Survivor Wants Christmas Cards. Will You Send Him Some?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Christianity Islam politics Sexuality transgender Uncategorized

Select a Month January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 October 2019 September 2019 July 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 June 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 October 2016 July 2016 June 2016 April 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the last king of Israel before the Assyrian conquest?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Amon Shallum Jehoahaz Hoshea