Review: A Canticle for Leibowitz by Walter M. Miller, Jr.

Last updated on: January 22, 2019 at 2:54 pm by Joseph Reninger

Review: A Canticle for Leibowitz by Walter M. Miller, Jr. 2019-01-22T14:54:58-06:00 Joseph Reninger

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A Canticle for Leibowitz by Walter M. Miller, Jr.

In this post-nuclear-war future (centuries from now), education is something despised. Along with wiping out the government officials (all of whom were blamed for the war), the mobs killed as many intelligent people as they could (who were blamed for giving the government officials the power to wage such destructive war). In the aftermath, a small community of monks strives to preserve learning. One monk is on a Lenten retreat in the wilderness and discovers a fallout shelter with an incredible amount of information in it, some of it seemingly written by the hand of the scientist Leibowitz, one of the intelligent people martyred for being smart. The community is the Albertian Order of Leibowitz, named after that man. The rediscovery of his writings is a bit like the rediscovery of Aristotle in the Middle Ages.

The intellectual revival does not happen for a long time afterward. Once civilization is built up enough, a scholar named Thon Taddeo comes to the monastery to determine the authenticity of the documents. Taddeo is secular and a bit above the religious ideas of the monks but he comes to an uneasy understanding as he discovers the monks’ practical applications that dovetail nicely with his theoretical research. The intellectual renaissance ensues, bringing a new age where nuclear weapons are again available to government officials. Can mankind avoid a historical rerun?

The book is an odd blend of authentic Catholicism (including a generous amount of Latin), historical echoes (besides the Aristotle-like bit, there’s a sort of Protestant Revolt), and pessimistic predictions. For a while the book seems unfocused and rambling. The ending sort of pulls things together though its blend of optimism and pessimism falls too far on the pessimism side for me to find it enjoyable. A lot of interesting ideas pop up along the way, but not enough to get a whole-hearted endorsement from me.

Review

Dystopia

Science Fiction

Previous Post

March 22, 2016

Review: English Catholic Heroines ed. by Joanna Bogle

Next Post

April 5, 2016 Review: Thomas More: A Portrait of Courage by Gerard B. Wegemer

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Art Bible Study Bulletin Board Catholic Church Excerpt Faith-y Stuff Funny Stuff Good Deals Listening Now Patheos Book Club Personal Reading Challenge Podcast Alert Random Bookishness Resources Review Uncategorized Well Said What I'm Reading

Select a Month January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 January 2016 December 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz