Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Good Letters

Honey, I Want a Tattoo

Last updated on: January 15, 2016 at 1:00 am   by Guest Contributor

Honey, I Want a Tattoo 2016-01-13T17:37:14-07:00 Guest Contributor

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

By Brad Fruhauff

Matching TattoosIf Katie had had a tattoo when we met, I probably would have married her thinking it quirky or even, perhaps, kind of cool. But when we married her only unusual body mod was a tasteful nose ring.

Fast forward twenty years. Out of the blue she says to me: “I want a tattoo.”

My first response was not, “Oh, that would be quirky and even, perhaps, kind of cool,” but something more like, “What, aren’t you happy in our marriage?”

The response in my head, at any rate. Out loud, I did what I usually do when I’m uncomfortable: grunted noncommittally and changed the subject.

My reaction surprised me. When I thought about it, I didn’t have moral objections, and I wasn’t convinced myself by the social objections. Why was I so uncomfortable?

Working out the answer took me on an unexpected psycho-spiritual and theological journey.

I stalled Katie initially with aesthetic objections. We can’t agree on where to hang pictures or what color towels to buy, so I had concerns about the design. If we don’t like our towels, we can buy new ones; if I didn’t like the tat, I’d have to see it every time she changed her clothes or we went swimming or made love.

It was more difficult for me to describe my discomfort with how eager she was to permanently change her body. For me that marked a social and emotional boundary with profound marital implications. I had a vague vision, crazy as it sounds, of rows of people standing on display, and some were plain, naked bodies and some were stamped with ink.

And in the vision my wife and I were not in the same camp.

Friends weren’t always helpful. It surprised me, in fact, when some of them said, “It’s her body, why do you care?” I thought, “That’s precisely why I care. Our bodies belong to each other; that’s biblical, friend.”

I knew what they meant, of course, but, PC or not, we believe the love we’ve found in marriage has given us each a deep, intimate claim over the other, including the other’s body. To be honest, the anxious part of me did want to exert control, but the loving part of me wanted to be sure I was caring for her and for our relationship.

And here was the crux of the issue: My care for my wife’s body can only be as loving as my theology of the body provides, and my theology, it turned out, had some limitations in this area.

James Smith argues that God’s incarnation as Jesus Christ affirms the persistence of the goodness of Creation pronounced in Genesis. God did not see it a tarnishing of his glory to take on human form. For Smith, this means that it is good for us to have finite, created bodies and even that we should expect to have finite, created bodies in eternity.

I’d been teaching this for years without having had to reckon with it in my own life.

Growing up a late-twentieth century Midwestern evangelical, I imbibed the familiar confusing messages about the body. Most bodily things belonged to our sin nature, but a few things were okay when you met certain conditions. Whereas my peers often rebelled against this confusion by doing all the prohibited things in a baby-and-bathwater rejection of “legalism,” even as an adolescent I recognized the nugget of truth and attempted to discriminate between what was and was not truly acceptable for my body.

But this tattoo situation made me realize that I still too often see my body as some kind of barrier between good and evil. On such a view, a little thing can spoil the idol of purity I’d concocted for myself.

We’re right to desire purity, of course. But the way I’d internalized the concept was not “the Lamb’s blood cleanses me” but “I must guard against the bad like a goalie guards the net.”

Imagine this absolutism developing within an emotionally enmeshing home environment where any difference was registered as the threat of abandonment. It took me until college to really do the separation from my parents thing.

Deep down, then, my reptile brain heard my wife saying, “I want to permanently stain my body and (thus) mark my separation from you.”

I had to appreciate that “getting a tattoo” meant something to different to each of us. She was willing to cross the line between those with ink and those without, those who chose to be pierced a thousand times by the needle, who walk around with the visible reminder, and those who refrained, who remained unmarked.

To me it meant experiencing my embodied self as a physical, temporal, permeable reality, someone who made a choice about his body at one point in time that will persist into a future that will unfold one day at a time. Unlike marriage and children, getting a tattoo had no script. It meant going off-book into an unfamiliar narrative.

The decisive moment came as a surprise. Katie changed strategies and suggested we get matching tattoos for our fifteenth anniversary. It was a cunning move because it circumvented my abandonment anxiety and allowed me to confront my incarnational issues alongside her.

I began to imagine my own body as the kind of thing that might be ornamented in such a way that might be good enough to merit its extension in space and time.

That’s where my wife wanted to go, and if she was going to be indelibly marked, then I, as the man who promised to always grow together with her, would do the same—not because I was afraid of losing her, but because I wanted to embrace the adventure of embodiment.

 

Brad Fruhauff is a film buff, comics nerd, literature scholar, editor, and writer living in Evanston, Illinois. He is Senior Editor at Relief: A Christian Literary Review and a Writing and Communications Specialist at Trinity International University where he also serves as Contributing Editor for Sapientia. He has published poems, essays, and reviews in Books & Culture, catapult, Christianity and Literature, Englewood Review of Books, Every Day Poems, Not Yet Christmas: An Advent Reader, Rock & Sling, and in the newly released How to Write a Poem.

GL banner

Faith

Guest Contributor

Personal Reflection

bible

Brad Fruhauff

faith

Jesus Christ

marriage

personal reflection

purity

relationships

tattoos

the body

Previous Post



January 14, 2016

Learning Detachment in the Attic

Next Post



January 18, 2016 Poetry as a Weapon of Jihad


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category A. G. Harmon Alissa Wilkinson Allison Backous Art Authors Brad Fruhauff Bradford Winters Bryan Bliss Caroline Langston Chad Thomas Johnston Chris Hoke Christiana N. Peterson Culture D.G. Myers D.L. Mayfield Daniel Bowman Jr. David Griffith Elizabeth Duffy Faith Film Greg Wolfe Guest Contributor Interview Jan Vallone Jeffrey Overstreet Jessica Eddings-Roeser Jessica Mesman Griffith Kelly Foster Lindsey Crittenden Morgan Meis music Natalie Vestin Nick Olson Peggy Rosenthal Personal Reflection Poetry Friday Reflection Relationships Review Richard Chess Richard Cole Sara Zarr Shannon Huffman Polson Sonya Bilocerkowycz Tania Runyan Tony Woodlief Topical Categories Uncategorized Vic Sizemore Writing

Select a Month October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 February 2008


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who does Paul describe as his true son in the faith?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Titus Timothy Philemon Onesimus

Related posts from Good Letters

Catholic

Waiting for Nothing to Happen

Good Letters

Catholic

Morning in a Forgotten Neighborhood

Good Letters

Catholic

Humans Love Heroes

Good Letters

Catholic

The Lost Goodbye

Good Letters

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

It’s What Comes From Within Which Matters

One of the most difficult things for us to understand is why...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought

The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube