Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Good Letters

Home
Catholic
Emily Dickinson Erased

Emily Dickinson Erased

Last updated on: June 26, 2014 at 12:13 pm by Morgan Meis

Emily Dickinson Erased 2014-06-26T12:13:38-07:00 Morgan Meis

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Don’t go to Emily Dickinson’s house in Amherst, Massachusetts. There isn’t anything there. Not her writing desk, not her books. Not her treasured items. Not her.

Emily Dickinson used the house in Amherst to hide from life. As she got older, Dickinson left the place less and less. Often, she refused even to greet visitors. She’d lock herself inside her room. There, she wrote letters and she wrote her poems.

And then, in 1886, Dickinson died. She left behind thousands of unpublished poems. They are strange poems for all their accessibility, and beloved by people everywhere. Her poems went out into the world in a way Emily Dickinson never could.

After her poems made her posthumously famous, Dickinson’s readers began to long for the presence of Emily Dickinson herself. People go to Dickinson’s house in Amherst to make some connection between the poems and the person. The house seems to be the key. The place where she dwelt in silence and solitary confinement would seem to hold secret clues.

But Emily was cleverer than that. She didn’t erase herself so completely in life simply to be dredged up by every clumsy tourist who stumbles through her house in Amherst 130 years later.

Even when she was alive it could be hard to find her in that house. Who was that flittering by at the top of the steps in a white gown? Could it have been Emily? No, her sister might say, that couldn’t have been Emily. She is sick today, not receiving visitors.

Emily Dickinson is still playing those same kinds of tricks today. Do you catch a glimpse of Emily in the downstairs parlor? Do you get a sense of her as you stand in her bedroom looking out of the window at the street below? You can tell yourself you do. Plenty of tourists pretend, daily, that they’ve learned something about Emily Dickinson by visiting her house. Plenty of people lie to themselves about the good time they’ve had. In reality, all they’ve experienced is a frustrating glimpse into emptiness.

The greatness of Emily Dickinson is in how seriously she took this disappearing act. It wasn’t fun for her, exactly. But it was necessary. Here’s what she wrote in “Behind Me Dips Eternity”:

Behind Me—dips Eternity—
Before Me—Immortality—
Myself—the Term between—
Death but the Drift of Eastern Gray

If Emily Dickinson is hiding anywhere, she is hiding in that dash, the one between “myself” and “the term between.” Another way to say the same thing is to say that “the term between” is the dash and therefore the dash is the self. Dickinson, in short, liked to see herself as a dash, a momentary interruption of the ceaseless flow of eternity behind and before.

“I like Emily Dickinson’s dashes.” That’s what Alfred Kazin said in his 1961 essay, “Emily Dickinson: Called Back.” I like Dickinson’s dashes too. But it is a scary thought, the idea that a person can be reduced to a dash. Kazin wrote that Dickinson “gave as her primary reason for writing poetry—‘I had a terror—since September—I could tell to none—and so I sing, as the Boy does by the Burying Grounds—because I am afraid.’”

The fear is essential. The man or woman who dares to look into the eternal without trembling isn’t doing it right. Emily Dickinson’s poetry, then, is her sustained attempt to find a language and syntax for thoughts that linger at the Burying Grounds. In becoming a dash, Dickinson was finding a way to be erased by the Absolute, who she sometimes called God.

There is a paradox there, of course. In writing about death and absence, Emily Dickinson found her subjective, personal voice. Her poems are uniquely her own. They are often strangely funny. Dickinson braces herself with wit and irony in famous poems like “Because I could not stop for Death.”

Because I could not stop for Death—
He kindly stopped for me—
The Carriage held but just Ourselves—
And Immortality.

These are terribly clever lines. This is Dickinson’s particular form of dark humor. It is how we know Emily as Emily. But the thinking in the lines is so “ironically demure,” as Kazin puts it, that the poem “remains enigmatic.” Emily Dickinson’s wittiness is like the final exhale of subjectivity before that subjectivity dissipates into the ether. Dickinson’s unique voice seeks to annihilate itself. Later in the poem, Dickinson writes that:

We paused before a House that seemed
A Swelling of the Ground—
The Roof was scarcely visible—
The Cornice—in the Ground—

From the perspective of death, every house, every human dwelling is but a brief “swelling of the ground.” Every house is already “in the ground.” Every person is, too.

In her house in Amherst, Emily Dickinson developed her own special relationship with death. She learned to die so well that there is nothing left of her. Except the poems, which have turned out, oddly and ironically, to be eternal.

Morgan Meis is the critic-at-large for The Smart Set (thesmartset.com). He has a PhD in Philosophy and has written for n+1, The Believer, Harper’s Magazine, and The Virginia Quarterly Review. He won the Whiting Award in 2013. Morgan is also an editor at 3 Quarks Daily, and a winner of a Creative Capital | Warhol Foundation Arts Writers grant. A book of Morgan’s selected essays can be found here. He can be reached at [email protected].

Previous Post

June 23, 2014

Snapshots from the Imperial City

Next Post

June 25, 2014 The Benediction of Place

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category A. G. Harmon Alissa Wilkinson Allison Backous Art Authors Brad Fruhauff Bradford Winters Bryan Bliss Caroline Langston Chad Thomas Johnston Chris Hoke Christiana N. Peterson Culture D.G. Myers D.L. Mayfield Daniel Bowman Jr. David Griffith Elizabeth Duffy Faith Film Greg Wolfe Guest Contributor Interview Jan Vallone Jeffrey Overstreet Jessica Eddings-Roeser Jessica Mesman Griffith Kelly Foster Lindsey Crittenden Morgan Meis music Natalie Vestin Nick Olson Peggy Rosenthal Personal Reflection Poetry Friday Reflection Relationships Review Richard Chess Richard Cole Sara Zarr Shannon Huffman Polson Sonya Bilocerkowycz Tania Runyan Tony Woodlief Topical Categories Uncategorized Vic Sizemore Writing

Select a Month October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 February 2008

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How long was Israel in Egyptian bondage?

Select your answer to see how you score.

300 years 500 years 400 years 200 years