Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Good Letters

Home
Catholic
The Wonderful Contradiction of Abstract Painting

The Wonderful Contradiction of Abstract Painting

Last updated on: March 7, 2013 at 1:07 pm by Guest Contributor

The Wonderful Contradiction of Abstract Painting 2013-03-07T13:07:42-07:00 Guest Contributor

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A Guest Post by Daniel Siedell

My approach to abstract painting changed forever fifteen years ago during a conversation with an artist friend in front of Kasimir Malevich’s White on White (1918) at the Museum of Modern Art.

As I was telling my friend about Malevich’s theories of abstraction and his utopian belief that paintings of squares and rectangles could transform society, my friend interrupted me and, with his nose about as close as one could get to a painting, whispered, “Look at this surface! How did he do it?”

As I looked at that meticulously worked-over canvas, White on White became something other than an idea or a theory.

It became a painting—a vulnerable, futile, and weak object, lovingly and painstakingly made by a human being in the midst of a world turned upside down by World War I and the Russian Revolution.

All of a sudden, Malevich’s rhetoric about the “supremacy of pure feeling or perception in the pictorial arts” and his desire to “free art from the ballast of the objective world” faded away, and I was confronted with one thing:

In the midst of chaos and exhilaration, of hope for a new world and a new humanity, Malevich painted a picture of a white rectangle on a white ground. What a wonderfully absurd thing to make.

Walking through the galleries of Inventing Abstraction: 1910-1925 at the Museum of Modern Art several weeks ago, every work on view appeared to me wonderfully absurd, delightfully contradictory—and therefore, extremely dangerous.

The goal of abstract painting is simple but radical. Free a picture from the need to represent the world—real or imagined—and use line, color, and form alone to produce an emotion or feeling. These artists rendered their work even more useless and marginal than other paintings by refusing to represent the things of this world with which we already have relationships, such as persons, bouquets, and landscapes.

And so the artists experienced resistance from the media and the public.

Artists like Malevich felt obliged to defend themselves, to strengthen their absurd paintings through words. So they wrote about purity and directness of experience. But their writings, which theorized, pontificated, and thundered about transformation and a new world, testified against their fragile pictures and simply affirmed the absurdity of their drawings and paintings of line, colors, and forms.

It is not surprising that these pictures became targets and the artists who painted them considered dangerous by governments fearful of the freedom to do absurdly wonderful things like paint pictures that had no apparent use.

Inventing Abstraction also pays homage to an unlikely hero, a vulnerable and frail man in his own right who just might have been responsible for saving many of these contradictions in paint, and even the persons who painted them.

In 1933, Alfred H. Barr, Jr., after four years on the job as founding director of the Museum of Modern Art, was granted a year’s leave of absence for nervous exhaustion. Barr and his wife spent the year in Germany and Barr was horrified by what he saw. Hitler had been named Chancellor of Germany that year and the Nazi party had begun targeting abstract paintings (and their makers) as degenerate.

Barr wasn’t concerned with the artists’ writings, their ideas and theories. He worried about the paintings themselves and the fate of their makers, many of whom were already in hiding or making plans to flee Germany.

And so this somewhat pedantic and obviously nervous scholar embarked on a courageous course of action. He began to find ways to save the artists and their art by bringing them to New York. In addition to buying work directly from the artists and dealers, he conceived of an exhibition shortly after his return that would serve as cover for his rescue mission.

Through the exhibition he was able to arrange for loans, which he planned to turn into purchases. Through his work, New York became safe for abstract painting, safe for the embattled artists who painted them.

Barr’s groundbreaking exhibition, entitled Cubism and Abstract Art, opened at the Museum of Modern Art in 1936, just one year before Hitler’s notorious Degenerate Art exhibition. The exhibition was Barr’s protest against fascism and a celebration of human freedom embodied in those lines, colors, and forms.

Inventing Abstraction bears witness to the reality that artists, like Malevich, had hoped that their artistic artifacts would change the world and transform humanity. The artists were right to believe that their work was subversive. But in the end, they needed protection from the very people they hoped would be changed by them.

What is the contradiction of abstraction to which Inventing Abstraction bears witness?

I’ll let the curator Leah Dickinson answer that question: “Abstraction’s pioneers announced its arrival with great fanfare, using the language of purgation, dissolution, and repudiation. But it only became fully institutionalized as a project of rescue, retrieval, and preservation” (my emphasis).

Mark Rothko, one of the most famous abstract painters in the United States, himself a Russian immigrant, was right. It is a risky business to send a painting out into the world.

Thank God for Malevich who had the courage to send White on White out into the world, which, on a dreary winter day many years ago, taught me to see even the most difficult and empty paintings to be full of humanity, suffering, and love.

And thank God for Alfred H. Barr, Jr. who loved abstract painting enough to bring White on White and so many others to New York, for you and for me.

Daniel A. Siedell (M.A. SUNY-Stony Brook, Ph.D. Iowa) is on staff at Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church in Fort Lauderdale where he is curator of Liberate, the resource ministry of Tullian Tchividjian. He is the author of God in the Gallery (Baker Academic, 2008) and numerous writings on Christianity and modern art. He blogs weekly at Cultivare.

Previous Post

March 6, 2013

Vengeance Isn’t Mine

Next Post

March 8, 2013 Can I Offer Up My Suffering?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category A. G. Harmon Alissa Wilkinson Allison Backous Art Authors Brad Fruhauff Bradford Winters Bryan Bliss Caroline Langston Chad Thomas Johnston Chris Hoke Christiana N. Peterson Culture D.G. Myers D.L. Mayfield Daniel Bowman Jr. David Griffith Elizabeth Duffy Faith Film Greg Wolfe Guest Contributor Interview Jan Vallone Jeffrey Overstreet Jessica Eddings-Roeser Jessica Mesman Griffith Kelly Foster Lindsey Crittenden Morgan Meis music Natalie Vestin Nick Olson Peggy Rosenthal Personal Reflection Poetry Friday Reflection Relationships Review Richard Chess Richard Cole Sara Zarr Shannon Huffman Polson Sonya Bilocerkowycz Tania Runyan Tony Woodlief Topical Categories Uncategorized Vic Sizemore Writing

Select a Month October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 February 2008

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which Psalm is an ancient call to worship: "Make a joyful noise to the Lord"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Psalm 23 Psalm 90 Psalm 100 Psalm 117