Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

God and the Machine

NY Times Joins the Temple Truthers

Last updated on: October 20, 2015 at 7:29 am   by Thomas L. McDonald

NY Times Joins the Temple Truthers 2015-10-20T07:29:37-04:00 Thomas L. McDonald

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

My history column for the Register this week is on Temple Trutherism. It’s like 9/11 Trutherism, only with slightly more anti-semitism!

Reporter Rick Gladstone shows us some of those high-quality skills you only get from journalism school by utterly ignoring the experts he interviewed and concocting a story about scholarly doubt as to whether the Temples were on the Temple Mount.

The New York Times found itself at the center of a firestorm last week after publishing an article that suggested there’s no proof the First and Second Temples ever stood on the Temple Mount. The claim is common among Palestinians and their allies eager to deny the historical ties of Jews to Jerusalem, but it’s shocking to find “the paper of record” giving credibility to the notion.

Archaeologists and Biblical scholars—including those quoted for the story—reacted with outrage on the internet. As with the so-called “Gospel of Jesus’s Wife” hoax, social media and blogs drove the story, pouncing on errors in the report and forcing the Times to retreat with a flurry of corrections, retractions, and ultimately an “editor’s note” attempting to clarify the initial, highly biased piece.

The story, titled “Historical Certainty Proves Elusive at Jerusalem’s Holiest Place” was written by Rick Gladstone, a reporter and editor on the Foreign Desk, who interviewed several noted academics on the subject. Two of these these sources later issued statements saying their words had been used out of context in such a way as to wholly alter their meaning.

Read it all.

There is no scenario in which this was an honest error or just sloppy writing. The statements of Jodi Magness, certainly one of the most famous and respected experts on the subject, make it clear that she spent an hour outlining the facts for Gladstone, and he simply ignored them.

The New York Times is all arrogance, with little left to back it up. Witness this alarming, jaw-dropping exchange with a Times editor:

[Oren] called the New York Times editorial-page editor, Andrew Rosenthal, after the paper published an op-ed by Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas in which Abbas startlingly claimed the Arabs had accepted the UN Partition Plan of 1947. The conversation went thus:

“When I write for the Times, fact checkers examine every word I write,” I began. “Did anybody check that Abbas has his facts exactly backward?”

“That’s your opinion,” Rosenthal replied.

“I’m an historian, Andy, and there are opinions and there are facts. That the Arabs rejected partition and the Jews accepted it is an irrefutable fact.”

“In your view.”

“Tell me, on June 6, 1944, did Allied forces land or did they not land on Normandy Beach?”

Rosenthal…replied, “Some might say so.”

magness

Archaeology

History

Islam

Israel

Judaism

Archaeology

Conspiracy

History

Islam

Jews

Judaism

Media

Muslims

Temple

Previous Post



October 13, 2015

Verdict on German Plan?: "Schismatical, heretical."

Next Post



October 20, 2015 Benedict and the Bishops on Communion for the Divorced


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Anthropology Archaeology Art Bible Books Chickens Church Computers Culture Wars Evil Fiction Film Games Ghosts Gospel of John Gospels History How I Pray Internet iPhone Islam Israel Jesus Judaism Language Lent Literature Marshall McLuhan Media Medieval Mental Health Mobile Movies Neil Postman News Old Testament Personal Political Pope Pope Benedict Pope Francis Prayer Robots Satan Sciency Sex Shakespeare Social Media Software St. Augustine Synod Synod on the Family Tarot Technology Television Theology Transhumanism Uncategorized Verbum

Select a Month November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many disciples did Jesus call as His closest followers?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Twenty Ten Seven Twelve

Related posts from God and the Machine

Catholic

Verdict on German Plan?: "Schismatical, heretical."

God and the Machine

Catholic

Want Some More Catholic History and Archaeology?

God and the Machine

Catholic

Is This Synod the Most Dangerous Crisis in...

God and the Machine

Catholic

Luther's Pact With the Devil

God and the Machine

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

It’s What Comes From Within Which Matters

One of the most difficult things for us to understand is why...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought

The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube