Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

PaterFamilias Today

Feminism, the Women’s March, and Aesthetics

Last updated on: January 26, 2017 at 12:00 pm   by C. R. Wiley

Feminism, the Women’s March, and Aesthetics 2017-01-26T12:00:43-04:00 C. R. Wiley

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Feminism and Aesthetics

Not the aesthetics of feminism. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_de_Milo,https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pietà_(Michelangelo), https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_of_Willendorf

The other day I stumbled across a post by a fellow Patheos blogger entitled, The Broken Aesthetics of Feminism.

I was intrigued because I have an interest in aesthetics. I’m not a feminist though, although I do know many women and I’m even related to a few of them. One of them happened to be my mother.

My mother was a Lefty. She was a fan of FDR and voted for him in every election after his death. She also liked Humbert Humphrey. She sincerely believed that there wasn’t a single thing the government couldn’t do better than the rest of us. To the expansion of the welfare state there was no imaginable limit. After my parents divorced she even married the welfare state. But it treated her no better than my father had. She died young.

But she was also something of an artist. She took me to museums as a child and I grew up surrounded by reproductions of Rodin and Michelangelo. (The Moses with the horns always unnerved me.) She even enrolled me in art school when I showed some promise.

So the question of feminism’s aesthetic took me back to my mother.

I can tell you she would have been appalled by what took place at the Women’s March. I’m sure she’d have hated the current President of the United States, but I am also sure that she would have believed that that is no excuse for the ugliness that was on parade in the march.

By the way, my mother was also strongly opposed to abortion.

So what about feminism’s aesthetic? Let’s begin with what it isn’t.

Look at those images above. None of them is a product of feminism.

Two of them are beautiful, the third I suppose you could say is functional. And this is precisely what makes them offensive to feminists.

These works situate women in the eyes of the community, either the eyes of men or their children. Feminism is a liberation from all of that, as we are ceaselessly told. But when women are free at last to define themselves, what do they make? The answer to this I believe gets us to the aesthetic of feminism.

It’s not a pretty picture.

I don’t think feminism’s aesthetic is broken, I think the Women’s March provided us with the real deal. Feminism is only capable of agitprop. It is made up of depraved quilters, and that’s about it.

The reason is it is solipsistic. It is turned inward to all the bitterness and hurt women feel, whether justified or not, and when it turns outward again you get the bile we saw spilled in the streets.

There is a bitter irony to this though.

Because feminists have turned away from traditional social roles and even from nature, they are defenseless against the subtle and ubiquitous influences of the zeitgeist and the welfare state. The women on display at the march weren’t just expressing themselves, they were parroting what they’ve been told.

I’m sure these women felt empowered by their experience; but I can assure you that traditionally-minded men like me were more amused than impressed. Not only did these women look ugly, they looked impotent and pretty silly.

Readers who are familiar with this blog know that I am an advocate for traditional notions of masculinity. And those notions are all about the functional roles men play in society. I don’t write much on feminism because I don’t really have much use for it.

I don’t hate feminists, they just don’t have a place in my world. Instead I prefer women. I find them very attractive and I like being around them. There are things they can do that I could never do, and I don’t even want to try. I don’t compete with them. Instead I prefer to compliment them as I complement them.

It’s a beautiful thing.

Art

Beauty

Children

Creativity

Manliness

Social Ethics

Aesthetics

Feminism

Previous Post



January 24, 2017

I Am Weary of the World-Weariness of the Unaccomplished

Next Post



January 31, 2017 The Family that Stays Together Can Pray Together


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advising a Daughter Aristotle Art Atheism Author and Speaking Appearances Beauty Building Working Houses C R Wiley Children Community Creativity Cultural Apologetics Fatherhood Fiction Fidelity in marriage Film Freedom Gravitas H. P. Lovecraft Happiness Household Economy Infant Baptism Inklings Interpreting the Bible Interviews Jack Donovan Liturgy Localism Man of the House Manliness Martial Virtue Medieval Cosmology Metaphysics Mortimus Clay NecronomiCon New Left New Testament Household Codes Nietzsche Nominalism/Realism Politics Poverty Preaching Productive Property Reaching men Science Self-Sufficiency Side Hustles Social Ethics Social Security Spiritual Disciplines Sublime Techno-gnosticism The Pastor's Survival Guide Theology of the Family Tradition Uncategorized Virtue Weird Fiction

Select a Month February 2019 November 2018 October 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did God use to lead the Israelites by day?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A pillar of fire A pillar of cloud An angel A trumpet

Books by This Author Books by PaterFamilias Today

See All Titles »

Books by C. R. Wiley

The Purloined Boy (The Weirdling Cycle #1)

The Purloined Boy (The Weirdling Cycle #1)

C. R. Wiley

Man of the House: A Handbook for Building a Shelter That Will Last in a World That Is Falling Apart

Man of the House: A Handbook for Building a Shelter That Will Last in a World That Is Falling Apart

C. R. Wiley

Related posts from PaterFamilias Today

Evangelical

Do Children Matter?

PaterFamilias Today

Evangelical

My Latest Appearance on The Chris Craft Show

PaterFamilias Today

Evangelical

Is This Evangelicalism's Red-Pill Moment?

PaterFamilias Today

Evangelical

Manhood at First Things and Touchstone

PaterFamilias Today

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

Falling Leaves: A Living Parable on Letting Go

I’ve spent the vast majority of my life in the southeast corner...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube