Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Give Us This Day

Home
Evangelical
Post-Anglican Anglicanism: Part II

Post-Anglican Anglicanism: Part II

Last updated on: September 1, 2012 at 8:47 pm by Fr. Charles Erlandson

Post-Anglican Anglicanism: Part II 2012-09-01T20:47:35-05:00 Fr. Charles Erlandson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Post-Anglican Anglicanism: Part II

What do I mean by a “Post-Anglican Anglicanism?” The phrase I’ve coined is deliberately ironic (and even oxymoronic!) I’m employing it to suggest that Anglican identity will be an even more complex and difficult thing in the 21st century than it has been in the past.

In previous blogs, I’ve defined Anglicanism in terms of structural, normative, and stylistic definitions or identities. The question is, “What does contemporary Anglicanism look like in terms of each of these definitions?”

Structurally, Anglicanism has become more confusing and blurry, as is the case with most institutions in the postmodern situation. The Anglican Communion served for much of the 20th century as a convenient way of seeing how Anglican churches relate to one another in a common identity and has been for many (as I discussed in an earlier blog) the most definite and common definition of Anglicanism.

But with the ongoing orthodox Anglican realignment and the rise of GAFCON as an alternative to the decaying Anglican Communion, the structural definition of Anglicanism has become much more difficult and complex. The present situation has provoked the question of whether or not communion with Canterbury is necessary or not to Anglican identity.

There’s more to it. The scramble by many orthodox Anglicans to create new wineskins for new wine has led to the development of overlapping jurisdictions, something that has been frowned upon for the most part in church history. To make matters more confusing, Anglicans are choosing which bishop they serve under based not on geography but on “affinity.” While this might seem a necessary move if the bishop in a certain jurisdiction is heretical, what will develop when this democratic notion is used to select bishops based on churchmanship or other issues? The issue of women’s ordination also contributes to the increasing fragmentation of a structural definition of Anglicanism, a development, we should remember, that’s only 35 years old.

It’s ironic as well that the structural definition of Anglicanism as being those churches in communion with Canterbury has risen to prominence at the very time when structural definitions are most problematic.

The present situation forces Anglicans to ask the question of how shall we govern ourselves and relate to one another without the power of the State to coerce us into such decisions. It’s a question Anglicans haven’t had to ask themselves for a very long time.

It might seem at first, then, that normative definitions will fare much better in such confusing times and will provide some much needed stability. However, the two most important distinctively Anglican formularies – the Prayer Book and the Thirty-nine Articles – are increasingly contested authorities.

And identity is intimately related to authority.

Some Anglicans have rejected the Articles. The 1979 Prayer Book relegates them to the “Historical Documents” where they have been ignored for the most part. And Anglo-Catholics for the most part have a sometimes not so secret hostility towards the Articles. While GAFCON and the ACNA may have the Articles as official theological norms, the reality on the ground may be very different.

As for the Prayer Book, in global terms the traditional Prayer Books are falling into disuse. While the 1662 Prayer Book is still the official formulary for the Church of England, virtually all parishes have effectively replaced it with Common Worship, which allows for such a wide variety of disparate usage that it’s hard to see what aspects of worship are still in common. Many other provinces have replaced the traditional Prayer Books, most notably in TEC. And some other orthodox Anglican churches prefer home-grown liturgies or a smorgasbord of usages from any Prayer Book in existence.

I’m guardedly optimistic about the ACNA producing a sound Prayer Book, but perhaps the larger question there is will anyone use it?

Stylistically, the divergent orthodox Anglicans spiritualities that currently exist stretch the boundaries of a coherent Anglican to the breaking point and beyond. In previous posts I’ve explored ways in which the Evangelical, charismatic, Anglo-Catholic, and Global spiritualities have all challenged the earlier Anglican consensus.

This issue of diversity threatening to undo any coherent identity can be illustrated in the following provocative question: “What does an Anglo-Catholic who is against women’s ordination, hates the Thirty-nine Articles and uses the Missal have in common with an Evangelical who favors women’s ordination, adheres to the Articles, and uses a homegrown liturgy?”

It appears likely, then, that a post-Anglicanism will have the following characteristics:

1. Anglican identity will continue to be contested, without the power of the State to resolve disputes and disagreements.

2. Many will be comfortable being a particular brand of Anglican. For example, being Anglican Evangelical over Evangelical Anglican, or being primarily. This is related to the concept of hybridity – Anglicanism will be mixed with other things.

3. Many people will be cafeteria Anglicans, picking and choosing what aspects of Anglicanism they wish to embrace.

5. Boundaries will be blurred. Many will continue to call themselves Anglican, but it will be increasingly difficult to say why.

6. Anglican churches will have to re-negotiate what being Anglican means and what’s most essential to being an Anglican Christian.

All of this should alarm us and bring us to attention.

But it should also, strangely, encourage us because we will be forced to do theology, practical theology, in which the love of God and the mystery of Christ and His Bride are worked out in our common lives. The truth is that Christian identity, including Anglican identity, has always been constructed. When it becomes too easy to say “I’m an Anglican” or “I’m a Christian” without having to define this and live by it, then the Church becomes impotent.

My study of church history, especially Anglican history has taught me that there is no Golden Age of the Church, and yet every age is the Golden Age.

Perhaps Charles Dickens said it best, when he said: “It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before us, we were all going direct to heaven, we were all going direct the other way – in short, the period was so far like the present period, that some of its noisiest authorities insisted on its being received, for good or for evil, in the superlative degree of comparison only.” (A Tale of Two Cities)

Reformed Catholicism Blog

Anglican Communion

authority

identity

normative definitions

post-Anglican Anglicanism

structural definitions

Previous Post

August 31, 2012

Saturday of Trinity 12 - Romans 15:17-33

Next Post

September 2, 2012 Monday of Trinity 13 - Matthew 1

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Book Reviews Featured Give Us This Day Give Us This Day Devotional love me love my wife Love My Wife Reformed Catholicism Blog Spirit-Reality Take This Cup Uncategorized

Select a Month February 2022 November 2021 October 2021 August 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 September 2018 July 2018 March 2018 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What animal did Daniel survive with?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Lions Leopards Bears Wolves