Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Give Us This Day

Home
Evangelical
Post-Anglican Anglicanism: Part I

Post-Anglican Anglicanism: Part I

Last updated on: August 16, 2012 at 10:49 pm by Fr. Charles Erlandson

Post-Anglican Anglicanism: Part I 2012-08-16T22:49:46-05:00 Fr. Charles Erlandson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Post-Anglican Anglicanism – Part I

In my recent posts, I’ve been going through the main periods of Anglican history since the Reformation. Here’s the way I’ve divided things up:

Act I. 1533-1867 – Erastian Reformed Catholicism

Act II. 1867-1960s – Colonial Relationships; 4 Spiritualities

ActIII. 1960s-1998 (or 2003) – the Anglican Communion

Act IV. 1998 (or 2003) – present – Post-Anglican (or Postmodern) Anglicanism

I’ll conclude this historical overview with a discussion of what I’m calling Post-Anglican (or Postmodern) Anglicanism, which I date from either 1998 or 2003 to the present. 1998 is a suitable starting point because of the dramatic new attention given to the global aspect of Anglicanism as a result of Lambeth, especially the Global South and what I’ve called the Global Anglican Spirituality. This new attention on the global characteristic of Anglicanism as a result of Lambeth 1998 also produced a greater awareness of the ways in which Anglican churches at the global level should relate to one another.

2003 is also a good place to designate as the beginning of Post-Anglican Anglicanism because the consecration of Gene Robinson by The Episcopal Church precipitated the theological and ecclesiastical realignment that was, ultimately, inevitable.

Many of the things that Anglicanism is experiencing as a challenge to its identity is, I believe, a consequence of the forces of postmodernity that are threatening the identity of just about every entity imaginable, from individuals to families to churches to public institutions. Among these forces or trends, of which I would like to write much more in the future, are: suspicion of “metanarratives”; pluralism; disunity; choice and consumerism; constructed reality (existentialism); fragmentation; lack of clear identity and the co-existence of multiple identities; decentralization; a secondarily oral culture; networked existences and hypermedia; and homelessness and being lost in the cosmos.

My Ph.D. thesis was on the nature of orthodox Anglican identity. I had wanted to study the renewal of Anglicanism but ultimately realized that renewal is predicated upon a clear identity. The truth is, however, that Anglicanism is in the midst of a major identity crisis. I used to have a German friend who was always going around, running his hands through his red hair and mussing it up, lamenting loudly in his thick accent: “Ja, ja: I am in CRISIS!” That’s what a lot of us Anglicans are doing these days!

Problems of identity are ultimately problems of authority: if you have no authority to define things, then things get intolerably messy very quickly. Where there is no governing authority (which, by the way, doesn’t have to be tyrannical), diversity triumphs over unity. For this reason, since there is no consensus about what human nature is anymore, it’s no wonder that gender confusion abounds. We have all become existentialists, believing Sartre’s dictum that “existence precedes essence,” which means that there is no fixed human nature: we construct reality and the meaning of our lives. Authority, even without external compulsion, is conducive to unity. Where authority is weak, fragmentary, or contradictory, then diversity threatens to undo any coherent identity.

The Church universal is not immune to these things. Anglicanism has a huge problem with understanding authority, and therefore Anglicanism has a huge problem with diversity. It is liberal Anglicanism that has most notably pushed diversity to the point that being an Anglican is meaningless. If you can be an Anglican priest as well as a Wiccan priestess or Moslem or Buddhist, then “Anglican” is just another lifestyle choice with no substance.

The diversity of liberalism stems from its lack of any coherent authority. Theological liberalism begins by denying the authority of the Scriptures, and as a result an intolerable degree of diversity is tolerated.

But it turns out that the problem of diversity, which is really a problem of identity and authority, is systemic to the postmodern condition and is not the exclusive domain of liberals. For this reason, we orthodox Anglicans are also unsure of what it means to be Anglican.

I see I’m running out of space this time, so I’ll define the paradox of a “Post-Anglican Anglicanism” next time, as well as examining the degree of diversity found in orthodox Anglicanism.

Reformed Catholicism Blog

Previous Post

August 16, 2012

Friday of Trinity 10 - Romans 7:14-25

Next Post

August 17, 2012 Saturday of Trinity 10 - Romans 8:1-17

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Book Reviews Featured Give Us This Day Give Us This Day Devotional love me love my wife Love My Wife Reformed Catholicism Blog Spirit-Reality Take This Cup Uncategorized

Select a Month February 2022 November 2021 October 2021 August 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 September 2018 July 2018 March 2018 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small, out of you will come a ruler over Israel. What makes this town significant?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A place of prophecy The birthplace of the Messiah David's hometown A holy city