Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

GetReligion

Home
Religion News
Generic person of God (or gods) busted for selling fake art

Generic person of God (or gods) busted for selling fake art

Last updated on: August 29, 2014 at 1:32 pm by tmatt

Generic person of God (or gods) busted for selling fake art 2014-08-29T13:32:09-04:00 tmatt

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

So, if you read a news report about a politician who did something really stupid or really bad — illegal even — what is the first question that would leap into your mind?

Right. You’d want to know what kind of politician, what brand of politician, the story was talking about. Ditto for all kinds of other cultural figures, from scholars, to musicians, to business people or to any other kind of work frequented by a wide variety of people who believe a wide variety of different things.

Thus, a former GetReligionista emailed us the URL for an interesting New York Times piece, but it’s a piece with a rather strange hole in the middle of its facts. The headline:

Pastor Who Tried to Sell Fake Damien Hirst Paintings Is Sentenced to 6 Months

Nothing all that unusual there, methinks. But let’s move on to take a look at the top of the story:

A Florida pastor who was convicted of trying to sell fake Damien Hirst paintings to an undercover police officer was sentenced on Monday to six months in jail and five years of probation.

Justice Bonnie G. Wittner of State Supreme Court in Manhattan said a jail sentence was warranted because the pastor, Kevin Sutherland, had chosen to sell the works to a person he believed was a New York collector shortly after the Sotheby’s auction house said one of the paintings could not be authenticated.

Nothing usual so far, right?

But before we proceed, let’s pause and ask — for unenlightened folks who live far from New York City — a relevant question: Who is Damien Hirst and why is the term “enfant terrible” so frequently attached to his name in modern-art circles? And, oh, what is the postmodern theological statement attached to that dead Tiger Shark at the top of this post?

That question rather answers itself, with a bit of reading. However, once you have surfed through some of the links in that Google search, many GetReligion readers will be inspired to ask another logical, and I would say journalistic, question: What kind of pastor would be attracted into Hirst territory and might have connections to people who would want to purchase fake copies of his work?

In other words: What brand of pastor are we talking about in this story?

Apparently, this was not a question that entered the minds of the urban elites employed at the Times copy desk. Perhaps all of the pastors that they know admire and collect Hirst?

At no point in the story is the Rev. Kevin Sutherland linked to any particular denomination or religious tradition. Instead readers are told things like this:

Prosecutors said Mr. Sutherland had not only tried to rid himself of paintings he knew were forged, but tried to sell them at a profit. They asked for a prison sentence of between one and three years.

“This crime was motivated by greed,” said Rachel Hochhauser, an assistant district attorney. “He did more than try to pass on his financial loss. He tried to get a windfall from it.”

But Mr. Sutherland’s lawyer, Sam Talkin, argued that his client had no criminal past and should receive probation. He portrayed the crime as “an isolated detour from an otherwise law-abiding life.”

Apparently the pastor has no past of any kind. As the former GetReligionista noted: “It’s like saying ‘a politician’ or ‘a doctor’ without any more detail.”

Why omit this detail? I would be interested in hearing calm, level-headed theories offered by readers in our comments pages. My own theory? I have hinted at it in the “categories” tag for the piece.

IMAGE: Yes, of course. It’s the famous Hirst work — a tiger shark preserved in formaldehyde — called “The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living.”

Previous Post

May 20, 2014

That deacon and CBS veteran sacks a Womenpriests 'story'

Next Post

May 21, 2014 The Atlantic finds new sect: Southern Baptist Convention

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 5Q+1 Academia Anglicanism Announcements Atheists & Agnostics Baptists Books Business & Economy Catholicism Creeping Fundamentalism Education Ethics Evangelicals Film First Person gays Godbeat Got news? Humor Interviews Islam Journalism Judaism Lutherans Mainline Marriage & family Middle East Mormons Music Nones Orthodoxy Pagans Pentecostalism People Podcasts Politics Pop Culture Race Radio & TV Religion religious liberty Same-sex marriage Science Sex Social Issues Sports Uncategorized Vatican Web/Tech What is this? World World Religions Worship

Select a Month August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 May 2010 July 2009 February 2009 October 2008 July 2008 January 2007 August 2006 July 2006 October 2005

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What animal did fed Elijah?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Eagles Sparrows Ravens Doves