Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

GetReligion

Home
Religion News
Pod people: Define ‘fetus’ and give three examples

Pod people: Define ‘fetus’ and give three examples

Last updated on: May 17, 2013 at 6:28 am by tmatt

Pod people: Define ‘fetus’ and give three examples 2013-05-17T06:28:23-04:00 tmatt

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The first question I faced, in this week’s “Crossroads” interview, sounded relatively simple: Why did journalists struggle to use the word “fetus” accurately when covering the trial of Dr. Kermit Gosnell?

Like or not, I have had to pay a lot of attention to this issue in recent weeks. For those who have been off the planet during that time, click here for a recent look at The New York Times and its evolution on this topic.

But in this podcast, we went back to the beginning and tried to follow the logic of these arguments all the way through to the end.

You see, back in the days just before and just after Roe vs. Wade, journalists found themselves caught between two forms of language. On one side, on the moral left, there were people who wanted to use the term “fetus” whenever possible, in order to avoid talking about the selective termination of “babies,” “unborn children,” etc. Since surveys show that most journalists, especially in elite newsrooms, are pro-abortion rights, this can affect coverage.

Meanwhile, real people in the real world tend — when dealing with pregnancies — to use baby language. I mean, surely it is rare for someone to come home from the doctor waving an early ultrasound image and say, “Hey! Look at the first picture of our fetus (or perhaps grandfetus)!”

So what happens when you have a story in which two different groups of people — in direct and paraphrased quotations — using these two radically different forms of language? There is tension, to say the least.

I have seen stories in which it was clear that reporters, or editors, went out of their way to avoid direct quotes that included “baby” and “unborn child” language. The result? Paraphrased quotes that literally put fetus language into the mouths of people who didn’t use it.

And what is happening now?

Let me stress that these earlier disputes focused on coverage of stories about babies who had not been born. In a technical sense, the word ‘fetus’ was awkward, but accurate. Remember that definition?

fe·tus … pl. fe·tus·es
… 2. In humans, the unborn young from the end of the eighth week after conception to the moment of birth, as distinguished from the earlier embryo.

Now, we are in a new era.

There continue to be people who insist on using “fetus” language whenever possible. The defenders of Gosnell, in the trial, insisted that he had never done what his staff insisted he had done — deliver intact, sometimes alive infants, and then snip their necks with scissors.

Thus, his defenders said they were talking about “fetuses,” not newborns.

The witnesses, and scientific experts for the prosecution, presented testimony and evidence that a few children were born alive and then killed — leading to the three final murder verdicts.

This side used “baby,” “infant,” “newborn” and “unborn child” language.

For weeks, some papers printed statements claiming that Gosnell was accused of killing fetuses, thus missing the whole point of the story.

Why did reporters and editors do that?

I don’t know. But this is not a new issue, folks. Does anyone remember when there were newspaper editors who refused to print the actual NAME of the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act? Even when covering debates and votes in Congress?

Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act

The New York Times

Previous Post

May 16, 2013

Victoria's Secret is way sexier than faith details

Next Post

May 17, 2013 A nun, some nukes and a haunted holy ghost story

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 5Q+1 Academia Anglicanism Announcements Atheists & Agnostics Baptists Books Business & Economy Catholicism Creeping Fundamentalism Education Ethics Evangelicals Film First Person gays Godbeat Got news? Humor Interviews Islam Journalism Judaism Lutherans Mainline Marriage & family Middle East Mormons Music Nones Orthodoxy Pagans Pentecostalism People Podcasts Politics Pop Culture Race Radio & TV Religion religious liberty Same-sex marriage Science Sex Social Issues Sports Uncategorized Vatican Web/Tech What is this? World World Religions Worship

Select a Month August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 May 2010 July 2009 February 2009 October 2008 July 2008 January 2007 August 2006 July 2006 October 2005

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What language was most of the Old Testament originally written in?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Latin Greek Aramaic Hebrew