Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

geneveith

Protecting the State from the Church

Last updated on: July 21, 2026 at 6:00 am   by Gene Veith

0 Comments

Protecting the State from the Church 2026-07-18T17:55:36-04:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Part II of our series on the Lutheran doctrine of the Two Kingdom:  This may prove to be the most controversial post in the series with its contention that the state needs to be protected from the church.  But that was the very battle that Luther was waging, the exact opposite of what many Christians today are seeking to do, namely, establishing the authority of the church over that of secular rulers.  Rather, Luther taught that God,  providentially and through vocation, works through earthly rulers.  And when the church attempts to rule the world, as with both the Pope and the Enthusiasts, it fixates on the law and neglects the gospel, concerned more with exercising power rather than proclaiming God’s grace through Christ. . . .

 The doctrine of the Two Kingdoms protects the church from the state.  That is what Christians appreciate the most. But the doctrine of the Two Kingdoms also protects the state from the church.  And this was the most immediate priority for Martin Luther as he was developing this teaching.

The medieval papacy claimed temporal authority.  The main basis for this claim was the so-called Donation of Constantine, according to which the Emperor Constantine, when he moved his imperial court to Constantinople, gave to the pope and his successors the city of Rome and the Western half of the Roman Empire.  That document was proven to be a forgery by Renaissance scholars, who showed that it mentioned happenings that did not take place in the time of Constantine, plagiarized a story about a pope slaying a dragon not written until the 5th century, and was written in medieval Latin rather than Roman Latin.[1]

But the pope’s claim to temporal authority was also given a theological basis.   Roman Catholic theologians contended that the Office of the Keys is given not to the disciples, not to pastors, not to the church, but to Peter alone, whose power to bind and loose sins “on earth” gives him and his successors the power to bind and loose everything on earth.  Furthermore, they argued that since Christ is the Lord of heaven and earth and the pope is the “Vicar of Christ,” the pope must be the lord of the earth.  To take one example of how this played out in practice, in 1570 the pope issued a bull removing the Protestant ruler of England, Queen Elizabeth I, from her throne and releasing her subjects from the duty to obey her or her laws.  The next pope took it even further, offering a dispensation to anyone who murdered the Queen.

Luther was outraged by the pope’s presuming to rule the world.  Romans 13 and 1 Peter 2 clearly state that earthly rulers–including those like the Emperor who are not Christians–are “agents” of God, by means of which God punishes evildoers and protects those who do well.[2]

Luther also contended against a Protestant version of this same claim.  The Enthusiasts were an early version of Pentecostalists who believed in the direct illumination of the Holy Spirit apart from God’s Word.  They were also an early version of the Millennialists who believed, in the words of the Augsburg Confession condemning them, “that before the resurrection of the dead the godly shall take possession of the kingdom of the world, the ungodly being everywhere suppressed.”[3]

Some of these Enthusiasts were not content to wait until the End Times, fomenting the Peasant Revolt, a broad social uprising in which mobs of peasants killed hundreds of landowners and their families, burning a thousand castles, manor houses, and monasteries.  Luther, shocked at the anarchy, called upon the ruling Princes to instill order by means of force, which they did, putting to death at least 100,000 of the rebels, a tragic ending for uneducated Christians misled by their religious leaders that their violence would usher in the kingdom of God on earth.

Why did Luther want to protect the state from being ruled by the church?  A major reason was that exercising political power distorts the message of the church.  Governing society must be done by applying power and forcing people to comply with the law.  When a church takes on this function, it becomes fixated on the Law and neglects the Gospel, the proclamation of forgiveness through Jesus Christ, which is the church’s reason for existing.  Indeed, the Church of Rome and the Protestant Enthusiasts were both churches of the Law, not the Gospel.

Today, the notion that the church should rule the state has come back, in much the same terms that Luther was contending against.  The so-called “Integralists,” well-represented among  conservative Catholics, are calling for a renewal of the church’s temporal authority, with the pope as the supreme earthly ruler.  Many Pentecostals today are caught up in the so-called “New Apostolic Reformation,” a movement in which Christians seize control of all dimensions of society–the “Seven Mountains” of Government, Media, Business, Education, Arts and Entertainment, Family, and Religion–and so rule the world, under the leadership of charismatic “apostles,” until Christ returns.  Among the Reformed, many Calvinists today are embracing a theocratic approach to government called “Dominionism” or “Reconstructionism,” in which Christians rule and the Bible is the law of the land.

Notice that Catholics with their integralism, Pentecostals with their New Apostolic Reformation, and Calvinists with their Dominionism all operate under the assumption that Christianity is a religion of Law.  Though the Gospel may be present in their teaching, it tends to play a relatively minor role.  All of these proposed “Confessional States” reject the principles and practices of what they dismiss as “liberal democracy”–that is, the rights, freedoms, and self-government of the American constitutional order–and so they reject religious liberty.

Non-Christians would not be allowed to vote, hold public office, or build houses of worship, such as synagogues, mosques, or temples.  As for other Christian religions, the rules vary:  Integralists would allow only Catholics to participate in the government.  The New Apostolic Reformation would require non-Pentecostal Christians to accept the authority of the “Apostles.”  Calvinist Dominionists say that they would, however, accept Christians of other theologies.

But make no mistake:  none of these “Confessional States” would be hospitable to Confessional Lutheranism.  These three strains–Catholic, Pentecostal, and Reformed–are exactly the theological traditions we are always criticizing.  I doubt such criticism would be allowed if any of these churches acquire political power and abolish religious liberty.

Next up:  Protecting the Church from the State

Notes

[1] See “The Donation of Constantine,” Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donation_of_Constantine#Further_reading

[2] For the Lutheran rejection of the pope’s claim to temporal authority and the defense of earthly rulers in light of God’s kingdoms, see Apology of the Augsburg Confession, Articles VII and VIII,  ¶23, and XVI.

[3] From “Article XVII. Christ’s Return for Judgment” in The Augsburg Confession, in Concordia: The Lutheran Confessions (St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 2006). Source: https://bookofconcord.cph.org/en/augsburg-confession/chief_articles/article_xvii/

Illustration:  Kings Kissing the Pope’s Foot by Lucas Cranach, from the print series The Passion of Christ and Antichrist via Google BooksTransferred from en.wikipedia to Commons., Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=3876766.  [In the series, this print is the antithesis of Cranach’s print of Jesus washing His disciple’s feet.]

Church

Government

History

Law

Politics

Reformation

Theology

Vocation

Doctrine of the Two Kingdoms

Dominionism

enthusiasts

Integralism

New Apostolic Reformation

temporal authority of the Pope

Previous Post



July 20, 2026

Misconceptions about the Doctrine of the Two Kingdoms

Next Post



July 22, 2026 Protecting the Church from the State

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"many tech developers are convinced that AI will soon cure cancer. Therefore, they can smoke ..."

David N. Gray


Monday Miscellany, 10/19/26

"As Yucaipa Heap once said "Knowledge for the people, give them a light and they'll ..."

reg


Monday Miscellany, 10/19/26

""Nevertheless, he retained the trust of Hitler for a time. After Hitler became Chancellor of ..."

reg


Monday Miscellany, 10/19/26

"Oh, I think they are far-right compared to you which leads you to believe a ..."

disqus_1T3AUzBvj


Monday Miscellany, 10/19/26


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

To what place did Jacob flee after stealing his brother's blessing?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Bethel Nineveh Egypt Haran

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »

Related posts from Cranach

Family

Monday Miscellany, 10/19/26

Cranach

Family

When to Use AI and When Not To

Cranach

Family

Luther on Tools

Cranach

Family

Monday Miscellany, 10/12/26

Cranach

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

Sunday Readings: Love God and Neighbor

The readings for the Thirtieth Sunday in Ordinary Time focus on one...

When to Use AI and When Not To

Drawing on my new book with Trevor Sutton, "Irreplaceable: Humanity, Vocation, and...

Crabs in a Bucket: Why Evangelicalism Won’t Let...

There’s an old saying about crabs in a bucket. You don’t need...

Chapter 10, Elena: Progress

Open and Relational Theology & Social Psychology About this series: This series...

How Should We ‘Use’ Early Christians?

In his prefatory letter to the king of France in his Institutes...

Christa Pike, Human Sacrifice

Tennessee wasn't just trying to kill Pike. It was trying to perform...

view all Evangelical blogs

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube