Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
The Dignity of the Work AI Is Supposed to Liberate Us From

The Dignity of the Work AI Is Supposed to Liberate Us From

Last updated on: April 24, 2026 at 10:35 am by Gene Veith

0 Comments

The Dignity of the Work AI Is Supposed to Liberate Us From 2026-04-24T10:35:53-04:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Some people are claiming that the impact on work of the impending AI revolution will be a good thing. In their telling, AI will free us from the drudgery that constitutes much of our work today, enabling us to spend our time with the more fulfilling parts of work, such as creativity and human relationships.

The conservative social scientist Arthur Brooks makes that argument in his Free Press column entitled It’s 2028: AI Has Made Your Life Much Happier. Presented as an answer to the Citrini memo that was all doom and gloom about how AI would destroy so many jobs by 2028 that it would bring down the whole economy (we blogged about that here), Brooks says that unlike some other technology, AI will give us happier, more meaningful lives.

He begins by distinguishing between “complex” problems, such those of relationships, love, meaning, faith, suffering, and the other big concerns of human life, and “complicated” problems, the practical side of human life that can be solved by effort, cognition, and technology.

Our work usually involves both: elements of “complex” problems (such as the hows and whys, the relationships with colleagues and customers, the creative dimension of our labors) and the “complicated” problems (such as writing reports and e-mails, configuring equipment, logistical planning, the physical parts of our job).

Brooks says that AI will take over the “complicated” parts of our work–all of the tedium and “busy work”–allowing us to devote ourselves completely to the “complex” parts of our work, leading us all to a greater level of satisfaction and sense of meaning. Brooks says,

AI is different from every other complicated problem to date, and here’s why: It has freed us from a huge amount of our most tedious, quotidian complicated problems—for example, what we need to do to support our families, but certainly wouldn’t do if we didn’t have to. This included nearly every routine intellectual or physical task, all types of data work, endless email correspondence, and—thanks be to God—the vast majority of meetings.

Thus, by 2028, just two years from today, according to Brook’s “thought experiment,” “a new day began to dawn for human flourishing”:

Life’s tiresome, complicated problems no longer had to occupy such a large part of people’s lives. And not just the awful meetings and tedious emails from their old jobs, but also the headaches of personal finance and logistics of family life. Even many big worries receded, as policy-oriented AI mostly stabilized the macroeconomy, making markets blessedly boring.

Today, in 2028, most people affected have realized that they can let technology take care of life’s complicated problems while they fill their abundant time in the complex spaces of life’s deep meaning: falling in love, exploring philosophy and religious faith, appreciating beauty of all types, even coming to understand the nature of their own natural suffering. A new kind of life entrepreneurship has begun to dawn: Real-life friendships flourish, people are having more babies than they did in decades, colleges overflow with philosophy and the humanities, houses of worship are bursting at the seams, and an appreciation of art and nature is growing.

First of all, as Brooks himself says, “A classic error is to seek a complicated solution to a complex problem—which makes the problem worse.” This is what happened with social media, he says, a “complicated” technological solution designed to solve the “complex” problem of loneliness by enhancing human connections. Instead, social media became “a substitute for in-person relationships and wound up [making its users] feeling lonelier and more isolated.” He admits that some people are using AI to do the same thing, but for reasons he doesn’t really explain he believes that people will stop doing that. But will they? Won’t technology that emulates the human mind and human communication make this problem worse?

But set that aside for now. Catholic sociologist Anne Hendershott answers Brook’s thesis by arguing that the very parts of work that Brooks dismisses as drudgery and tedious are where the dignity of labor is to be found. She has written an article for the Catholic Thing entitled The Dignity of Work in Catholic Social Thought. What she says, I think, can also apply in a Lutheran understanding of work and in Christian social thought more broadly:

Brooks imagines a future in which artificial intelligence frees us from what he calls the “complicated” tasks of life. In fact, Brooks treats routine intellectual labor as if it were merely a nuisance – email, drafting, data work, repetitive problem sets, the slow accumulation of skill.

Brooks’s vision begins from a premise that the Catholic tradition has long rejected: that work is primarily a burden to be escaped. In Catholic thought, work is not an obstacle to human flourishing but one of its primary engines. It is the arena in which we cultivate moral character and responsibility.

For a faithful Catholic, work is the daily practice through which we participate in Creation and contribute to the common good. A society that treats work as a problem to be eliminated misunderstands both human nature and the moral structure of ordinary life.

Brooks draws a sharp line between “complicated” tasks (solvable, mechanical) and “complex” ones (relational, existential). He seems to believe that these tasks are separate. But in practice, the two are intertwined.

The complicated work of preparing a lesson, grading a paper, drafting a report, or creating a budget is not separate from the meaning of teaching, mentoring, leading, consulting, strategizing, or forecasting. It is the substance of the vocation itself.

When AI removes the substance, it risks removing the vocation.

She alludes to the work of teaching and learning, which I’d like to go into in more detail. We teachers tend to enjoy interacting with students in the classroom, while disliking grading papers and preparing lesson plans. We are being told that AI could do the grading, the research for class preparation, putting together lesson plans, and writing tests.

On the student side, Hendershott tells about Einstein, an AI program that “logs into Canvas [an online education program] every day, watches lectures, reads essays, writes papers, participates in discussions, and submits your homework automatically.” Not only that, as I learned on the Einstein website, it will also do the online teachers‘ work:

By simply uploading a video, PowerPoint presentation, or document, educators can instantly create a fully immersive virtual course. Our advanced AI system automatically segments the content into logical mini-courses, generates relevant quizzes, voice-over (where necessary) and deploys an intelligent AI tutor to guide students through their learning journey.

AI can spare teachers the drudgery of the work of teaching. It can spare students the drudgery of reading assignments, writing papers, participating in class discussions, and doing homework. Teachers don’t have to teach, and students don’t have to learn. But the students get academic credit for letting AI take the course for them.

Writing, for example, is a “complicated” task that many people–whether teachers, students, scholars, managers, or pastors–find tedious and difficult, and it is something that AI can effortlessly emulate. But writing cannot be separated from the “complex” task of thinking. Gathering thoughts and information, doing research and making sense of it, takes place in the process of writing. Writers seldom have a body of knowledge in their heads, which they then simply write down. Rather, writing embodies the mental process of reflection and communication. And communication is a relational task, in which one human being connects with other human beings. Other “busy work” that AI can eliminate has similar value: planning, research, answering e-mails, sorting out logistical details, and even meetings.

Hendershott adds,

The greater mistake in Brooks’ “AI Happiness Theory” is the assumption that leisure, rather than work, is the primary engine of human flourishing. The Catholic tradition has always insisted on the opposite: that meaningful work orders the soul toward purpose.

As far back as 1963, Josef Pieper warned in his book, Leisure: The Basis of Culture , that a culture obsessed with escaping work eventually loses the capacity for genuine leisure – the kind of leisure that flows from an interior life that has been shaped by purpose and discipline.

When we treat work as a problem to be solved rather than a practice that forms us, we end up with neither: not the leisure we were promised, and certainly not the dignity we abandoned by allowing machines to do the work we should be doing.

“The task ahead is not to escape work but to reclaim its dignity,” she concludes, “so that we remain capable of realizing the meaning and joy that no technology can create.”

Illustration: Work Related Stress by Ciphr.com – https://www.flickr.com/photos/193749286@N04/51419721263/, CC BY 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=110072597

Catholic teaching on work

work and leisure

Previous Post

April 23, 2026

From Matthew the Tax Collector to Simon the Zealot

Next Post

April 27, 2026 Monday Miscellany, 4/27/26

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Turns out, she wasn’t the right tool for the job."

1another

Luther on Tools

"You may have just given me my next sermon opening line."

1another

Luther on Tools

"So Katie Zacharia lasted only a demiScaramucci as press secretary......"

reg

Luther on Tools

"Apropos to the post on Gen Z a couple days ago: "If you want the ..."

Steve Bauer

Luther on Tools

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many people did Jesus feed with five loaves of bread and two fish?

Select your answer to see how you score.

5,000 1,000 500 2,500

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »