Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
Monday Miscellany, 4/27/26

Monday Miscellany, 4/27/26

Last updated on: April 27, 2026 at 10:45 am by Gene Veith

0 Comments

Monday Miscellany, 4/27/26 2026-04-27T10:45:17-04:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Another assassination attempt against the president. Preventing fellow-citizens from being represented. And UK outlaws tobacco forever for anyone born after 2008.

Another Assassination Attempt Against the President

The White House Correspondents Dinner is one of the top social events of the year in Washington, D.C. Some 2,600 people were present in the Washington Hilton ballroom, including America’s elite journalists, Hollywood celebrities, much of the Cabinet–including Secretary of State Rubio and Secretary of Defense, I mean War, Hesgeth–and White House officials, including Vice President Vance.

And, of course, President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump. This was the first time in his presidency that Trump attended, since the custom is for presidents to get roasted by the comedians who usually perform at the dinner, and he knew the journalists would be a hostile crowd anyway. This time, in light of his sensibilities, a magician was scheduled to be the entertainment. This time, reportedly, the president was planning to roast the journalists. In fact, White House Press secretary Karoline Leavitt told a reporter from Fox News, “It’ll be funny. It’ll be entertaining. There will be some shots fired tonight, in the room. ”

Indeed there were. A 31-year-old California teacher named Cole Tomas Allen charged through the metal detectors, entered the ball room terrace above the ballroom downstairs, and started shooting. He got off as many as six rounds, reportedly from a shotgun, before he was tackled by Secret Service agents.

A law-enforcement officer was hit, but he was wearing a bullet-proof vest, which reportedly prevented serious injury. No one else was hurt. President Trump, the First Lady, and government officials were quickly ushered out of the room, as the other guests dove under the tables in their panic.

After order was restored, the president said the dinner should be continued, since “the show must go on,” but the dinner was cancelled.

The Washington Hilton was also where John Hinckley in 1981 shot President Reagan–along with Press Secretary James Brady, police officer Thomas Delahanty, and Secret Service agent Timothy McCarthy–all of whom were seriously injured.

This was the third time that an assassin has tried to kill President Trump. What should we learn from this attempt? Here are a few things that come to mind. . . .

Though the president rightly praised the quick action of the Secret Service agents in stopping Allen before more harm was done, this was a serious breech of security. How could a heavily armed individual just charge through the metal detector without being stopped? He couldn’t have done that at a TSA checkpoint in an airport!

Nearly our whole executive branch was there! In fact, seven of the top eight officials in the line of presidential succession (12 of the 18!) were at the dinner (Vice President JD Vance, House Speaker Mike Johnson, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, and Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum). If Allen had an automatic rifle instead of a shotgun, he could have decapitated our entire government! Or, at best, Senate President Pro Tempore Chuck Grassley would be our president.

I thought the Vice President and the President were not supposed to attend the same events, so that if the president were to die, the Vice President would be able to assume his office. But, no, here they were together. It’s also foolish for so many members of the Cabinet to gather together in one public place.

We must get serious about security. This is the second time the president was subjected to gunfire–the other time, at the golf course, the would-be assassin was apprehended before shots were fired–and that in itself is a failure of the Secret Service, which needs to conduct an intensive review of its personnel and procedures.

Also, the journalists in attendance, who now know something of what it is like to be under fire, should tone down their rhetoric. Most of them oppose Donald Trump, which is their right, but to demonize him as many of them have been doing, presenting him as a threat to democracy, a dictator, a Hitler, creates the atmosphere that precipitates violence like this.

Preventing Fellow-Citizens from Being Represented

Gerrymandering is defined as “the political manipulation of electoral district boundaries to advantage a party, group, or socioeconomic class.” I prefer the definition of Morgan State journalism professor Wayne Dawkins: “politicians picking their voters instead of voters picking their politicians.”

Our representative democracy breaks up states into districts so that local voters can elect congressional and state lawmakers who represent their views and interests. The best practice, mandated by law in a number of states, is to have non-partisan, independent commissions determine these districts, usually based on geography and various population centers. The word “gerrymandering” derives from Massachusetts Governor Elbridge Gerry–who would later become Vice President under James Madison–who signed a redistricting scheme that included a district shaped like salamander to ensure that it would be dominated by his Democratic-Republican party.

The Wikipedia article on the subject linked above includes this: “Gerrymandering is almost always considered a corruption of the democratic process.” You think? The party with the redistricting power is disenfranchising members of the rival party, turning them into a minority that cannot get their candidates elected.

Today, though, politicians from both parties are eagerly and openly engaging in this “corruption of the democratic process.”

The Republicans started it, at the urging of President Trump, in deep-red Texas, which eliminated 5 predominantly Democratic districts and turned them into Republican districts. To counter that, deep-blue California voters passed a proposition that would allow the suspension of the independent commissions to allow for gerrymandering that turned 5 Republican districts into 5 Democratic districts. Thus cancelling out what Texas did.

Then other states–the red states of North Carolina, Ohio, Missouri–continued the tit-for-tat. Now Virginia voters have chosen to “temporarily” suspend their non-partisan redistricting process to gerrymander away all Republican districts but one.

What Virginia did is the most shameful of all of these other cases. Unlike the other gerrymanderers, Virginia is neither a predominantly-Republican red state nor a predominantly-Democratic blue state. It’s a “purple” state, with a nearly equal mix of both parties, with the Democrats concentrated in close proximity to Washington, D.C., home to thousands upon thousands of federal workers, and the Republicans concentrated in the rural and small town regions of the rest of the state.

Sometimes Virginia, where I used to live, elects Democrats and sometimes it elects Republicans. Recently, by a very narrow margin, the state elected a Democratic governor to replace the term-limited Republican governor they elected by a narrow margin. This redistricting vote was decided by a very narrow margin.

Currently, the state has 6 Democratic congressional representatives and 5 Republican representatives. With this vote, Virginians will be represented in the House of Representatives by 10 Democrats and only 1 Republican.

“Northern Virginia’s population of federal bureaucrats and Beltway bandits will dominate the majority of the state’s House delegation,” observes John Fund,. “One district will stretch in a narrow corridor from Reagan National Airport near D.C. all the way to Williamsburg,” a distance of 152 miles. “D.C.-area Democrats, with little more than a slight majority, have voted to federally disenfranchise the rest of the state’s Republicans,” observes National Review‘s Jeffrey Blehar. “The state will be represented in Congress almost entirely by Fairfax County, and most of its ‘downstate’ representatives will hail from within a 50-mile radius of Washington, D.C.”

What Virginia did is particularly shameful because this time citizens voted to disenfranchise their fellow citizens. The message is that you rural Republican voters don’t get to have a representative in Congress. This is not just a matter of dirty tricks by politicians, which sadly we have become accustomed to. Americans are doing this to each other. This is the extreme point of our political polarization and the vibe-shift against democracy.

So far, in the gerrymandering war, the Democrats are up one over the Republicans, a margin that can be crucial in the midterm elections. But mostly-red Florida is about to get revenge.

These gerrymanders are being challenged in court. A Virginia circuit court has already ruled that the measure passed is unconstitutional for lots of reasons, but that ruling is being appealed. The Supreme Court will probably have the last word on this and the other attempts of political parties to manipulate our democracy to their ends.

Gerrymandering is wrong, whether Democrats or Republicans do it. We should salute the great state of Indiana, a solidly red Republican stronghold that refused to employ this tactic, defying the wrath of President Trump.

UK Outlaws Tobacco Forever for Anyone Born after 2008

You will recall that 250 years ago, the United States broke off from Great Britain to attain freedom. Today, though, Great Britain has the reputation of being, as we say, a “free country.” It isn’t.

If you are 17 or under today, you will never be able to buy tobacco no matter how old you get.

The UK has passed the Tobacco and Vapes Bill, which will outlaw anyone born on or after January 1, 2009, from ever buying tobacco.

So if you are 17 or younger, 50 years from now, when you are 67, you will still have to find someone older than you to buy you your smokes.

The UK’s Christopher Snowden, has written an article for Spiked entitled Tobacco and Vapes Bill: The Stupidest Law Ever Passed in Britain. Noting that supporters are congratulating themselves for creating “the first smoke-free generation,” he says that this will be as successful as drug laws were in creating “the first cannabis-free generation.” Banning smoking for the rising cohort of adults, though not existing adults, will only create a black market. He points out that Australia, which passed similar draconian anti-smoking laws, is now plagued by gang violence, with rival bands of cigarette-smugglers battle murdering each other in turf wars. In addition, he says, this law will encourage young adults to smoke by making cigarettes “forbidden fruit.” And by also restricting vaping–which Snowden describes as the most effective means of quitting smoking–tobacco addiction will be worse than ever.

My question: If the UK parliament really thinks banning cigarettes for adults will be effective and will save so many lives, why not ban them for all adults rather than just some of them?

My prediction: Smoking marijuana will become legal in the UK, but smoking tobacco will not be. Unless you were born after 2008.

Trump assassination attempts

UK anti-smoking law

White House Correspondence Dinner

Previous Post

April 24, 2026

The Dignity of the Work AI Is Supposed to Liberate Us From

Next Post

April 28, 2026 Lost Civilization

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"I am told one only gets the $90 if one is on a Supplemental Medicare ..."

reg

On Trump’s Political Ads That You ..."

"I too don't think the $5,000 giveaway will happen, but only because the Trumpublicans won't ..."

Tom Hering

On Trump’s Political Ads That You ..."

"Well, large cash give-aways are generally bad policy, but really bad in any of the ..."

1another

On Trump’s Political Ads That You ..."

"Well, we think it pretty much fits my thesis, except I'm not sure whether all ..."

kerner

On Trump’s Political Ads That You ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which is the only book that does not mention "God"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Lamentations Ezra Esther Song of Solomon

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »