Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
Holy Week Miscellany, 2026

Holy Week Miscellany, 2026

Last updated on: March 30, 2026 at 6:00 am by Gene Veith

0 Comments

Holy Week Miscellany, 2026 2026-03-28T08:20:20-04:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Finnish Lutherans CONVICTED for booklet on the Bible & homosexuality. Americans’ opinions about AI. And the Olympics won’t allow transgender athletes to compete as women.

Finnish Lutherans CONVICTED for Booklet on the Bible & Homosexuality

We’ve blogged many times about Finland putting on trial member of parliament Dr. Päivi Räsänen and Lutheran Bishop Juhana Pohjola (whose church is in fellowship with the LCMS) for expressing the Biblical teaching about homosexuality.

They were acquitted of violating the country’s hate-crime law, but because Finland doesn’t have our constitutional protection against double jeopardy (that is, being tried more than once for the same charge), prosecutors appealed the decision (unlike in the U.S., where if you are found innocent, that settles the matter and only guilty verdicts can be appealed). The appeals court also acquitted them. So the prosecutors appealed to the Finnish Supreme Court.

Here, though acquitted of some charges, on one of them, they were found guilty! The court threw out the complaint that started the prosecution, a tweet from Räsänen in which she quoted the Bible to criticize the state church for being a co-sponsor of a gay pride parade. She had also been charged for participating in a radio debate on the issue, but that charge had been dropped earlier. When prosecutors discovered that she, in her capacity as a medical doctor, had written a booklet entitled Male and Female He Created Them: Homosexual Relationships Challenge the Christian Understanding of Humanity, they further charged Bishop Pohjola for the crime of publishing it.

The Supreme Court found both Dr. Räsänen and Bishop Pohjola guilty of violating the provision of the hate crime law forbidding “insult.” From the Alliance Defending Freedom, which was defending them in the case:

The Court found Räsänen and the Bishop guilty for having “made available to the public and kept available to the public opinions that insult homosexuals as a group on the basis of their sexual orientation”. It held that: “it must be taken into account that the text forming the basis for the conviction did not contain incitement to violence or comparable threat-like fomenting of hatred. The conduct is therefore not particularly serious in terms of the nature of the offense”.

The document was published in 2004, before the hate-crime law was passed, but the court ruled that since it is still available, the author, publisher, and publishing company should be punished. Both of the accused will be fined 20 days wages (1,800 euros=$2,078) and the publisher, Luther Foundation Finland–which is connected to the Lutheran Heritage Foundation (a Recognized Service Organization of the LCMS)–was fined 5,000 euros ($5,772). In an Orwellian twist, the court also ruled that the offending statements must be “removed from public access and destroyed.” (This being America, you can still read and download an English translation, courtesy of the Lutheran Heritage Foundation, at the LCMS website here.)

Since Finland is a member of the European Union, Dr. Räsänen is considering appealing the verdict to the European Court of Human Rights.

She wrote about her “criminal conviction” at National Review, where, among other hard-hitting points, she says this:

If a decades-old church publication can be erased by judicial order, then no one who has ever expressed a belief in the public square can assume their words are beyond reach. This is what “hate speech” laws allow. Past expression can be revisited, judged, and suppressed.

Ask yourself: What have you written over the years? A blog post, a comment, a paper for school, a pamphlet for your community? Under a standard like this, any peaceful expression could become the subject of a criminal investigation.

Joy Pullman at The Federalist puts it even more strongly: “The decision could tacitly ban orthodox Christianity in Finland by banning Christians from speaking about what the Bible clearly says.”

We recently blogged about Finland being the happiest country on earth, but it is not the freest. It is said to be the best place in the world to lose your wallet–your freedom of speech, your freedom of the press, your freedom of thought, and your religious liberty, not so much.

Americans’ Opinions about AI

“There are basically two ways to know you have a future,” said Palantir head Alex Karp of the impact of AI. “One, you have some vocational training. Or two, you’re neurodivergent.”

He himself has dyslexia, so he lauds “neurodivergent” folks who can “think differently.” AI will eliminate white collar jobs, so only the trades will be left.

I’m glad the trades–electricians, plumbers, construction workers, etc.–are getting more of the attention they deserve and that they are thought to have a bright future, as AI takes over the other sectors of employment. Too bad white collar jobs comprise 62% of American employment.

The prospect of a 62% unemployment rate might be a factor in Americans’ overall disapproval of the impending AI takeover.

In his article for National Review entitled The More Americans Use AI, the More They Fear It, James Lynch lists study after study documenting Americans’ opposition to the new technology. A sampling:

A poll from NBC News released last week found AI has a -20 approval rating, with 26 percent rating it positively compared to 46 percent who were negative.

–The latest poll taken by YouGov and The Economist found three times as many Americans have negative expectations for AI’s impact on society compared to those with a positive outlook. The poll showed 47 percent expect AI to have mostly or entirely negative effects on society, compared to 16 percent who said AI would have mostly or entirely positive effects.

–Blue Rose Research, a Democratic research firm run by respected liberal pollster David Shor, recently released data which show 67 percent of people distrust the claim that AI will not create widespread job loss. Fifty-six percent of Americans also distrust the claim that AI will create economic productivity to everyone’s benefit.

–Blue Rose’s study found that 57 percent of Americans think AI is advancing too fast and 77 percent are worried about the emergence of AI technology eliminating entire industries. A large portion of Americans, 72 percent, believe AI will change the job market in ways that drive down wages, and 56 percent fear the possibility of themselves or their family members losing their job because of AI.

The big corporations are excited about AI, mainly because they believe AI will let them decrease their workforce and thus make more money. But the workforce that will be decreasing does not share that excitement.

People love technology when it makes their lives better–as in the automobile, electric lights, X-rays, telephones, air conditioning, television, the internet–but why would people want technology that they think will make their lives worse?

Must we adopt technology if its social impact would be harmful, just because it is feasible? We developed nuclear weapons, but since we could be annihilated by a nuclear exchange, we draw back from using them in war. We can bio-engineer deadly diseases. We can clone multiple copies of ourselves. We can monitor citizens’ every activity. But, though some people or the government would like to do some of these things, American citizens have pushed through laws restricting them.

AI may have its uses, but do we really want to accommodate it by coming up with a completely different socio-economic order?

The Olympics Won’t Allow Transgender Athletes to Compete as Women

The International Olympics Committee will no longer allow biological males to compete as females in women’s sports. The sex of athletes will be determined by a genetic test. The ruling will apply to both individual and team sports.

The IOC statement about the new policy quotes its president Kirsty Coventry:

“As a former athlete, I passionately believe in the rights of all Olympians to take part in fair competition. The policy that we have announced is based on science and has been led by medical experts. At the Olympic Games, even the smallest margins can be the difference between victory and defeat. So, it is absolutely clear that it would not be fair for biological males to compete in the female category. In addition, in some sports it would simply not be safe.”

Transgender athletes will, however, be eligible to compete in categories corresponding to their biological sex and in events that do not classify participants by sex.

Bishop Juhana Pohjola

Finnish hate crime trial

Olympics and Transgenderism

Päivi Räsänen

persecution of Christians

Previous Post

March 27, 2026

The "Post-Secular" Philosopher Jürgen Habermas Has Died

Next Post

March 31, 2026 Valerius, One of the Greatest Devotional Writers

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"I know wired earbuds are making a comeback (I never stopped using them as I ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

"VCRs, tape decks, and cassette players are all having a revival among a segment of ..."

Tom Hering

Luther on Tools

"As a (retired) lawyer I see potential liability from sharing things like power or sharp ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

"I am not sure the items you mentioned, though disused, discontinued, discarded, could be considered ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How long was the wedding celebrations length in Biblical times?

Select your answer to see how you score.

3 days 7 days 5 days 10 days

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »