Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
AI Watch, Part 2

AI Watch, Part 2

Last updated on: March 13, 2026 at 6:00 am by Gene Veith

0 Comments

AI Watch, Part 2 2026-03-11T11:37:44-04:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

What AI at its BEST will do to the economy. The rural, small town resistance to AI. And the next election campaigns will be rife with AI.

What AI at its BEST Will Do to the Economy

Citrini Research, a small financial research firm with the most read financial page on Substack, posted an analysis entitled The 2028 Global Intelligence Crisis. It caused the stock market to drop 822 points.

It asked the question, what if AI meets the most optimistic expectations? It increases productivity, goes beyond what human beings are capable of, makes new discoveries, avoids the scary Sci-Fi scenario of trying to destroy the human race, and makes our lives better in wonderful ways. What will AI at its best do?

Answer: It will destroy the economy. Also, the society.

Most of the report is a thought experiment written from the perspective of a mere two years in the future. Read it yourself.

To put it simply, the analysis says that companies will embrace an ascendant AI and make huge profits by increasing productivity while cutting labor costs. But the labor that AI will replace comes from high-salaried white collar jobs. As unemployment soars in those “intelligence” fields, consumer spending plummets.

White collar workers, whose training is not easily transferable to other occupations as blue collar workers, will be forced into the “gig” economy, but the massive influx of Uber drivers will send those wages even lower, as will the AI development of self-driving vehicles.

The displaced knowledge workers will no longer be able to pay their high mortgages, resulting in a housing crash, with similar catastrophes in other industries. Large numbers of defaults will devastate the credit markets and cause banks to collapse. Tax receipts will tumble, putting the government into crisis.

The report describes all kind of negative loops and downward spirals. “While the politicians bicker,” says the report, “the social fabric is fraying faster than the legislative process can move.”

At the end, the report gives the bottom line (Citrini’s emphasis):

For the entirety of modern economic history, human intelligence has been the scarce input. Capital was abundant (or at least, replicable). Natural resources were finite but substitutable. Technology improved slowly enough that humans could adapt. Intelligence, the ability to analyze, decide, create, persuade, and coordinate, was the thing that could not be replicated at scale.

Human intelligence derived its inherent premium from its scarcity. Every institution in our economy, from the labor market to the mortgage market to the tax code, was designed for a world in which that assumption held.

We are now experiencing the unwind of that premium. Machine intelligence is now a competent and rapidly improving substitute for human intelligence across a growing range of tasks. The financial system, optimized over decades for a world of scarce human minds, is repricing. That repricing is painful, disorderly, and far from complete. . . .

This is the first time in history the most productive asset in the economy has produced fewer, not more, jobs. Nobody’s framework fits, because none were designed for a world where the scarce input became abundant. So we have to make new frameworks. Whether we build them in time is the only question that matters.

Read this from the Wall Street Journal about the impact of this report, concluding with a good summary: “Many of Monday’s [stock market] moves roughly aligned with the situation outlined by Citrini, in which fast-advancing AI tools allow spending cuts across industries, sparking mass white-collar unemployment and in turn leading to financial contagion.”

I’ve read several reactions pooh-poohing the report, claiming that every technological innovation ends up increasing employment and bettering everyone. But I haven’t seen any that actually engage with the specific concerns raised in the Citrini report or giving reasons why these scenarios will not come to pass. The underlying issue is whether AI is qualitatively different from other technological innovations. I guess we’ll see.

The Rural, Small Town Resistance to AI

Oklahoma, my ancestral home, may be the reddest of the red states, where Donald Trump won in every county. Its small, rural communities are in sore need of jobs and investment. But they are rising up against the AI data centers that the tech companies, encouraged by President Trump, are trying to build on the red Oklahoma soil.

Similar resistance is breaking out across the country. The Wall Street Journal tells the tale in a story by Anvee Bhutani and Amrith Ramkumar entitled These Rural Americans Are Trying to Hold Back the Tide of AI with the explanatory deck, “Fearing rising utility costs, job losses and privacy violations, residents have blocked or delayed data-center projects around the country.”

The reporters tell about how Howell Township, a Michigan farming community, stopped a $1 billion, 1,000 acre data center, by pressuring the county planning commission to refuse to approve the project. They quote a newly-minted activist: “I assumed Republicans would be for this: business, deregulation,” said Breanne Green, a community organizer who helped start one of the first Facebook groups there opposing the project. “That just evaporated.”

The battle is part of a nationwide resistance to the AI boom, challenging President Trump and others who have embraced the technology. Fearing rising utility costs, job losses and privacy violations, locals blocked or delayed about 20 projects around the country representing nearly $100 billion in combined investment in the second quarter of last year, according to Data Center Watch, a research firm tracking the fights.

Many of them belong to tech giants including Meta and Amazon.com, fueling battles from Indiana to Oklahoma. Trump’s industry-friendly AI strategy has received criticism from other Republicans including former strategist Steve Bannon and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who fought a recent executive order aimed at challenging states that pass AI regulations.

“This is a fundamental contradiction that is emerging from the Trump coalition,” said Michael Toscano, a senior fellow at the right-leaning Institute for Family Studies. More than 70% of consumers in the think tank’s recent survey in six Republican or battleground states said they were either concerned about AI or felt it was a big threat. “It’s potentially a very large problem for Republicans that are running in reliably red states” where MAGA voters don’t want to be sidelined in favor of Silicon Valley, he added.

The tech companies are telling these folks: This will benefit you! Development! Prosperity! Jobs! Trump wants it! But that’s less important to these folks–whom I know well–than the fact that they just don’t approve of AI.

UPDATE: One problem: a “high-pitched whine.”

(This, of course, ties into this weekend’s discussion topic.)

The Next Election Campaigns Will Be Rife with AI

In the upcoming elections, candidates from both parties are planning AI strategies.

You can expect AI-generated political ads, AI-written campaign literature, AI-crafted speeches, AI-concocted policy papers, and AI-manufactured opposition smears. And consulting companies are gearing up to manipulate AI queries and chats to make politicians look good. (As in yesterday’s item at this blog entitled “How to Hack AI.”)

Politico tells about one of these consulting firms in an article by Jessica Piper entitled A tech group is launching a new effort to keep Democrats from falling behind on AI, with the deck “Tech for Campaigns plans to partner with Democratic groups to test what works.”

According to the article,

Campaigns across the political spectrum are grappling with how to take advantage of the rapidly evolving technology. Major Republican groups have embraced AI-generated content for ads more than their Democratic counterparts in the past year, although some Democratic campaigns have used AI imagery. AI-generated ads tend to be less expensive for campaigns, but strategists are still figuring out how voters feel about them — Rep. Jasmine Crockett’s Senate campaign came under fire this week amid online accusations that her latest ad featured an AI-generated crowd image, although her campaign said it “was created through hundreds of hours of real craft and collaboration between creatives and union labor” without commenting on whether AI was also used.

As for Tech for Campaigns, which the Democratic Party is planning to pay millions of dollars, here are some of the projects in the works:

Among the challenges the group hopes to tackle: Shaping how candidates show up in output from large language models such as ChatGPT, a practice known as answer engine optimization. Outside researchers have found that AI chatbots can be effective at political persuasion, with voters shifting their opinions on candidates or issues after a short conversation.

Alter said campaigns need to ensure they are well-represented in chatbot results about them, lest the chatbot basing their response more on an opponent’s research and messaging. While major companies are prioritizing shaping chatbots’ response, she said, campaigns so far have been more hesitant to work on it.

The group also hopes to study whether AI tools can help with personalized communication and how Democrats can make better use of platforms, such as Reddit, where the party has generally had less of a presence.

So if you get a personalized communication from a politician in the upcoming campaigns, you can expect it to be from AI. And if you get into a political discussion on Reddit, you might be arguing with an AI chatbot.

And “shaping how candidates show up” and making sure candidates are “well-represented” on chatbots is exactly what we were writing about yesterday in “How to Hack AI” on how information on AI can be manipulated, simply by posting what you want to show up on the internet.

Wouldn’t you say that giving AI free rein in politics–thus driving out authentic human interaction in favor of fakery and manipulation–is a threat to our democracy?

Photo: What Are the Power Requirements for AI Data Centers? via Hanwha Data Centers [a builder of data centers, headquartered in Korea], CC BY-NC 4.0

Culture

Economics

Previous Post

March 13, 2026

DISCUSS: "The Next Big Political Issue"

Next Post

March 16, 2026 Monday Miscellany, 3/16/26

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"While she worked for Trump she was a tool's tool!"

reg

Luther on Tools

"I know wired earbuds are making a comeback (I never stopped using them as I ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

"VCRs, tape decks, and cassette players are all having a revival among a segment of ..."

Tom Hering

Luther on Tools

"As a (retired) lawyer I see potential liability from sharing things like power or sharp ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Lo-Ammi" mean in Hebrew?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Not My People The Lord is My Salvation Chosen One Exiled

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »