Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
Two Critiques of Liberal Democracy, plus a Way Forward

Two Critiques of Liberal Democracy, plus a Way Forward

Last updated on: February 4, 2026 at 6:00 am by Gene Veith

0 Comments

Two Critiques of Liberal Democracy, plus a Way Forward 2026-01-26T16:42:20-05:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The word “liberal” has lots of meanings, but it derives from the Latin word for freedom. In political theory, “liberalism” refers not just to progressivism but to a political order based on freedom, rights, and democracy. That is, the political ideology embodied in the American constitutional order.

Though conservatives align themselves against liberalism in the sense of progressivism, American conservatism has traditionally been “liberal” in this more technical sense. But today those foundational American principles of democracy, rights, and freedom are being questioned. And many conservatives are embracing “post-liberalism.” What that political ideology means in practice is not clear, but Christians playing around with some form of theocracy (Calvinist dominionists, Catholic integralists, and the Pentecostal Seven Mountain Mandate) are post-liberals, as are overt authoritarians, such as Nick Fuentes.

But what post-liberalism mainly means today is a critique of liberalism and the Enlightenment-era philosophy behind it, rather than a program to replace it. And that critique is not altogether wrong. David G. Bonagura Jr. summarizes two of those challenges to liberal democracy in his article for Law & Liberty entitled The Many Deaths of Liberalism. One of them, though, shows a way to keep the liberal tradition, while avoiding the particular manifestations that have led to the problems.

First, Bonagura summarizes the arguments of Notre Dame political scientist Patrick Deneen, the author of arguably the most incisive criticism of this ideology, in his book Why Liberalism Failed:

Deneen argues that liberalism failed as an ideology because it succeeded “at achieving supreme and complete freedom through the liberation of the individual from particular places, relationships, memberships, and even identities.” This liberation, however, had the unintended effect of subjecting the individual to “the very forces today that are embraced as the tools of liberation,” chiefly “the depersonalization and abstraction advanced via two main entities—the state and the market.”

Deneen identifies two philosophical assumptions that shape the liberal institutions that dominate the West: “anthropological individualism and voluntarist conception of choice.” When put into practice, these assumptions make liberalism “self-contradictory,” for its insistence on “extreme license” requires coexistence with “extreme oppression.” Deneen dedicates chapters to these oppressing forces: technology, education, the new aristocracy of wealthy liberals, and a culture at war with nature, time, and place. Liberalism promised to make man free, but everywhere he is in chains that liberalism unwittingly forged.

In the words of the Amazon description, “liberalism is built on a foundation of contradictions: it trumpets equal rights while fostering incomparable material inequality; its legitimacy rests on consent, yet it discourages civic commitments in favor of privatism; and in its pursuit of individual autonomy, it has given rise to the most far-reaching, comprehensive state system in human history.”

Well, Deneen has a point, or, rather, lots of points. Liberal democracy exalts freedom, which has given us the “extreme license” of the sexual revolution, which has undermined the family and thus the social order that human beings need. It exalts “choice,” which has given us the “pro-choice” abortion movement and the general collapse of objective morality, undermining any kind of humane society.

Bonagura also cites the analysis of British historian Christopher Dawson, whose book The Judgment of the Nations, published in 1942 in the early years of World War II, includes a chapter titled “The Failure of Liberalism.”

Dawson, emphasizing the societal element, underscores that the uninspired self-centeredness that liberalism engenders makes it incapable of supporting a civilization and, consequently, leaves it open to be swallowed by stronger totalitarian ideologies that fill the vacuum created by liberalism’s weak philosophical vision.

“Dawson and Deneen arrive at the same conclusion,” observes Bonagura: “when liberalism fails, it collapses into illiberalism.” The problem with liberalism is that it leads to illiberalism. Thus, Deneen is not wanting to get rid of freedom, rights, and democracy. His complaint is that the Enlightenment rationalism that was the impetus for modern liberalism is too weak a foundation for them.

Dawson, on the other hand, says that liberalism, in fact, long predates the Enlightenment. All of its elements can be found in the Greek democracies and the Roman republic. And Christianity played a key role.

The first Christians, caught between the laws of the state and their higher loyalty to God, began to discern a spiritual dimension of freedom, actualized and obtained through faith, that included citizenship in the heavenly city. This broader understanding of freedom, argues Dawson, enabled the Latin-speaking cultures to incorporate the northern barbarians into their way of life and form what we call Christendom.

This freedom took political form in the self-governing medieval cities (which, I would add, would become hotbeds of the Reformation):

The growth of medieval towns and cities created the conditions for this conception of freedom to become part of the fabric of political life. . . .As guilds rose to prominence, their leaders stepped beyond their associations to seek control of political and juridical tasks that had lain within the province of the local bishop or noble. . . .Medieval towns and cities succeeded in integrating “corporate organization, economic function and civic freedom.” In this, the representative principle of government as we understand it today was born for societies that functioned as living organisms whose flourishing hinged on their many organs performing their respective functions—including that of governance—for the good of the whole. . . .From this experience grew “the medieval idea of liberty, which … was not the right of the individual to follow his own will, but the privilege of sharing in a highly organized form of corporate life which possessed its own constitution and rights of self-government.”. . .

Dawson. . . recalls that “at the roots of the development of Western freedom and Western democracy there lies the medieval idea that men possess rights even against the state and that society is not a totalitarian political unit but a community made up of a complex variety of social organisms, each possessing an autonomous life and its own free institutions.”

For Dawson, liberalism is what largely defines Western civilization. The Enlightenment version, which both Dawson and Deneen criticize, was a narrowing of this tradition. The broader classical and Christian version is not hyper-individualistic; rather, it is grounded in community. Freedom is not “excessive license”; rather, governed by a moral order, it is the liberty of participating in society. This classical, Christian liberalism counters the Enlightenment’s drift towards state totalitarianism by upholding decentralized “free institutions,” such as the family, the congregation, and local governments.

The average American in 1776 had probably never heard of John Locke, but was well-aware of the Magna Carta, which limited the power of kings, and the principles of Puritan republicanism, which for awhile overthrew the British monarchy.

To preserve liberalism in light of the failures of Enlightenment-style liberal ideology, says Bonagura, we must recover the liberal tradition.

The central problem of liberal ideology is pushing God into the realm of private opinion and deifying the individual in his place. The doctrine of the individual unmoored from and superior to family, community, and nation has shaken all three units to their core.

The way forward after liberal ideology’s failure is not a replacement of the US Constitution with a new, postliberal or nonliberal form of governance, nor is it primarily one of political reform. Rather, what is needed is to replant the individual in the soil from which he came—that of family, community, and nation with all their attachments, including religion. True human dignity and freedom are found there, not in a disembodied and rootless understanding of the individual as a self-determining and autonomous agent. And the liberal tradition cannot be properly understood apart from the Christian tradition that situates the individual and his freedom within a grander order with a supernatural goal and purpose.

Photo: Christopher Dawson by Levan Ramishvili – https://www.flickr.com/photos/levanrami/51414620320/in/album-72157719755653166/, CC0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=117487663

Christianity and liberalism

Christopher Dawson

critics of liberal democracy

liberalism

medieval cities

Patrick Deneen

Previous Post

February 3, 2026

What the Hard Left and the Hard Right Have in Common

Next Post

February 5, 2026 You Don't Have to Be an Academic to Be an Intellectual

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Apropos to the post on Gen Z a couple days ago: "If you want the ..."

Steve Bauer

Luther on Tools

"“Don't eat with your hands, son, use your entrenching tool.”"

reg

Luther on Tools

"You serious, Clark?"

reg

Luther on Tools

"And all tools are made of media, thus making language and literature a tool (see, ..."

Steve Bauer

Luther on Tools

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

According to 1 Peter, Jesus bore our sins in his body where?

Select your answer to see how you score.

On the mountain In the tomb In the garden On the tree (cross)

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »