Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

geneveith

Monday Miscellany, 2/16/26

Last updated on: February 16, 2026 at 6:00 am   by Gene Veith

0 Comments

Monday Miscellany, 2/16/26 2026-02-13T17:49:49-05:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The government now owes more than the whole nation produces.  Michigan defines opposition to abortion as sex discrimination.  And a schism among the ICE protesters.

The Government Now Owes More Than the Whole Nation Produces

Back in 2018, I wrote a blog post with the panicked but descriptive title In 10 Years, the National Debt Will Be 96% of the Gross Domestic Product.  That apocalypse was projected to happen in 2028, comfortably in the future then; but now just two years away.

But here it is 2026 and we are surpassing that milestone this year!  According to non-partisan Congressional Budget Office figures for 2026, debt held by the public will be 100.6% of the entire Gross Domestic Product.  And in ten years from today, in 2036, the percentage will have risen to 120.2%.

In dollar amounts for 2026, the government debt, which it must pay back including interest, is $32 trillion.  The GDP, defined as “the monetary value of all the finished goods and services produced within a country’s borders,” is $31.9 trillion.

To review, the national debt is not the total of what everyone in the nation owes, with all of their mortgages, installment payments, and credit cards.  It’s just what the government owes.  This is in the form of treasury bills, treasury bonds, U.S. Savings Bonds, and other instruments.  You are probably a moneylender to Uncle Sam if you have a pension, mutual funds, an IRA, or similar investments.  Treasuries are popular because they are considered a safe investment since they are “backed by the full faith and credit of the United States government.”

Foreign countries own around 30% of U.S. debt.  Of that, about 40% comes from Europe.  Our biggest creditor is Japan, which has lent us $1.2 trillion.  Next is our good friend the UK with $888.5 billion.  Third is our adversary, China, to whom we are on the hook for $682.6 billion.  Then comes Belgium at $481 billion.  Number 5 is our close friend with whom we are feuding, Canada, at $472.2 billion.  Those who think the USA doesn’t need other countries so we can treat them any way we want should consider how they are propping up our government’s finances.

Does this really matter?  After all, this debt is mostly in the form of bonds, which mature at different times, so our obligations are staggered.  When we need to pay them off, we can just issue more bonds, which always have customers eager to buy them.  We can keep that up forever.   Of course, paying off investments with the money from new investments, which are then paid off with newer investments is the definition of a Ponzi Scheme.  Those are illegal, but maybe the government can get away with it.  Eventually, though, Ponzi Schemes crash once they get so big there are not enough new investors to cover what earlier investors put in and everybody gets wise to the scam.

In the meantime, an unfathomable amount of money is going to prop up the government, money that could instead be invested in productive enterprises that would expand the economy dramatically.  (For more discussion on this topic, go here and here.)

I close with what I wrote in 2018:  Paying off the debt “would take every penny you and every other American earned [in a year]. The profits of Apple, Google, General Motors, and every other company; the year’s take in every pizza parlor and mom-and-pop business; the high-dollar investments on Wall Street; the cost of new homes and office buildings; our entire agricultural output in all of the fields of this vast land–all of this would be necessary to pay off what our government owes.”  But in 2026, that would still not quite be enough.

Michigan Defines Opposition to Abortion as Sex Discrimination

The purple state of Michigan has amended its law against discrimination in employment so that the definition of “sex” includes “termination of a pregnancy.”

It also eliminated language that made clear that “pregnancy-related medical conditions” did not include “nontherapeutic abortions” and repealed its Abortion Insurance Opt-Out Act, which allowed employers not to cover abortion in health insurance benefits.

Two pro-life organizations have filed suit, claiming that the changes would force them to hire people who believe in abortion.  The lawsuit states:

The [Michigan Department of Civil Rights] also confirmed under oath that the Employment Clause would require a mission-focused or religious organization to hire someone who disagrees with their views so long as the applicant could nonetheless explain the organization’s views,” the suit says. “Michigan’s House Fiscal Agency explained that the Employment Clause prohibits ‘discrimination and adverse employment actions based on whether an individual is considering having an abortion or on their decision to have an abortion.’”

So being able to “explain the organization’s views” is to count as adherence to an organization’s mission!   Furthermore, says the lawsuit,

“Michigan’s law thus requires them to recruit and hire those with pro-abortion views, restricts these groups from explaining their pro-life requirements to applicants, and requires these groups to offer abortion coverage in their insurance plans because they generally offer insurance to their employees,” claims the lawsuit.

“The First Amendment protects Right to Life’s and PRC’s First Amendment freedoms to join with others to further a common cause and to refrain from participating in activities that contradict their beliefs. Michigan’s law infringes on these bedrock freedoms. For that reason, it is unconstitutional as applied here.”

In contrast, Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer said, “No one in Michigan should face discrimination because they exercised their constitutional rights, including their right to reproductive freedom by having an abortion.”

The Supreme Court, in overturning Roe v. Wade, ruled that there is no right to an abortion in the U.S. Constitution.  Whitmer must be referring to the Michigan state constitution, which was amended to allow abortion on demand.

A Schism Among the ICE Protesters

As the ICE operation in Minnesota shuts down but as protests continue across the country,  it’s telling to note a curious controversy that has arisen between the white activists and the immigrant groups they are championing.

So reports Asra Q. Nomani in a story for Fox News entitled  “White saviors”’ use of whistles causes bitter internal rift inside anti-ICE movement, with the deck, “Organizations from Seattle to Maryland tell predominantly White activists to quit ‘White Savior’ behavior during ICE operations.”

The mostly white activists blow whistles to create a cacophony that is part of their protest.  This is a tactic urged by groups such as the Party for Socialism and Liberation and the Democratic Socialists of America modeled after the tactics of European socialist and communist labor unions.  The loud noises call attention to the protests, alert the crowd when a “bad guy” is spotted, disrupt police operations, pressure opponents to leave, and create a sense of revolutionary disorder.

But immigrant groups, consisting mostly of Hispanics, absolutely hate the whistles.  They have been issuing statements against them.  Said a Seattle immigrant-led group,

“We show up with care and accountability, not noise or panic.”

“It is not about being the loudest, the bravest, or the most visible person on the scene or confronting immigration agents. It is a commitment to non-violence, discipline and harm reduction, centering the well-being of the most vulnerable immigrant and refugee committees in Washington.”

Maryland immigrants explained why:

The Maryland coalition warned that whistles can “escalate already volatile ICE agents,” “make it harder to document and capture information,” “increase the likelihood of aggression toward bystanders or the detained person” and “create confusion” for community members and children.

They also pointed to disproportionate impacts on “Black and Brown communities” that are already “overexposed to chronic noise pollution,” which they linked to PTSD, anxiety, sleep disruption and heart disease.

Perhaps most pointedly, the group rejected the symbolism itself. Whistles, it said, are historically associated with military and police operations, including “repression, raids and disappearances,” especially in developing countries.

“They were not tools used by communities under oppression,they were tools used against them,” they said, emphasizing their point in bold.

In the new clash between immigrant-led groups and mostly white activist allies, immigrant leaders warned that the tactics meant to signal solidarity can just as easily reproduce the sounds of “state power.”

Some of the immigrants are more pointed, telling their more affluent allies, “This is not an action movie. You are not in a one-on-one fight with ICE. And you are not the center of this situation.”  Others expressed irritation at what they called the “White Savior syndrome,” the sense that these privileged white progressives think they are saving the poor brown people.

But many of the whistle-blowers are pushing back, rejecting the immigrants’ plea to cut the noise.  “We believe in whistles,” a white Seattle protester said; “people want whistles. Nothing change [sic] no matter what WAISN [an immigrant group] says.

Nomani reported, “A separate comment derided long-term nonprofit workers as drinking the ‘koolaid,’ labeling nonviolent, disciplined approaches as ‘fed coded.'”  That is, supporting ICE by being insufficiently radical.

Again we see the divide between the educated, affluent, elite who constitute the base of the radical progressive movement and the blue collar, working class minorities whose interests the activists claim to be fighting for, but who can’t stand the activists’ condescension.

 

 

 

 

Economics

Government

Law

Life Issues

Politics

affluent radicals

government debt

Gross Domestic Product

Michigan pro-life lawsuit

pro-abortion laws

whistles at ICE protests

Previous Post



February 13, 2026

Are Evangelicals Protestant?

Next Post



February 17, 2026 On the Claim That Shakespeare Was a Black Woman

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"I know wired earbuds are making a comeback (I never stopped using them as I ..."

reg


Luther on Tools

"VCRs, tape decks, and cassette players are all having a revival among a segment of ..."

Tom Hering


Luther on Tools

"As a (retired) lawyer I see potential liability from sharing things like power or sharp ..."

reg


Luther on Tools

"I am not sure the items you mentioned, though disused, discontinued, discarded, could be considered ..."

reg


Luther on Tools


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: 3 John commends Diotrephes for his hospitality and love for the brethren.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »

Related posts from Cranach

Family

Monday Miscellany, 10/12/26

Cranach

Family

On Trump's Political Ads That You Paid For

Cranach

Family

Monday Miscellany, 9/28/26

Cranach

Family

How the Integralists Are Like the Socialists

Cranach

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

Methodist Central Hall and Westminster Abbey

Situated on the same square is Methodist Central Hall and Westminster Abbey. ...

57th Dove Awards Honor Dolly Parton, Crown New...

On gospel music’s biggest night, the 57th annual GMA Dove Awards honored...

The First Eucharistic Controversy: Christ’s Real Presence

For Catholics, the Eucharist is the source and summit of the Christian...

What a Stop Sign Can Teach Us About...

How to Make a Decision When You Can't Hear God Main point:...

Archdiocese Hosts Military Marriage Retreat in Germany

RASTATT, Germany — The transient military lifestyle, with its frequent deployments and...

Minted in God's Image

Nearly every morning, I make the drive to Detroit with my high-school-age...

view all Evangelical blogs

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube