Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
Prospects for War

Prospects for War

Last updated on: December 4, 2025 at 11:24 am by Gene Veith

0 Comments

Prospects for War 2025-12-04T11:24:12-05:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

What do you think are the prospects for war? Not a limited “police action” in which the U.S. gets bogged down in a conflict with a lesser power, but a world war scale conflagration in which the U.S. is fighting for its very existence?

European nations, long complacent under the security blanket of American protection, are now scared to death that Russia will invade them. Some nations are taking extraordinary measures, with their experts prediction war with Russia by 2029.

In Asia, some analysts are citing evidence that China is planning to attack Taiwan as early as 2027.

Princeton international affairs fellow Heather Penatzer has written an article for the British online publication Unherd entitled The Triumph of the Trump Doctrine.

She says that ever since the end of World War II, American foreign policy has been dominated by three priorities: First, the security of Western Europe against the threat of Soviet communism. Second, attempting to stabilize the Middle East, taking on Great Britain’s former role in securing access to the region’s oil. Third, protecting America’s commercial interests in the East Asia-Pacific region.

The three regions of interests formed a hierarchy of sorts: Europe first, the Middle East second, and Asia third. And despite runaway globalisation, the collapse of the Soviet Union, and the rise of China, this hierarchy of priorities has largely remained consistent. The past several US administrations doubled down on toppling regimes in the Middle East while acting as though Western Europe requires the same amount of US assistance that was needed to remedy the destruction of WWII and fend off Communism.

Penatzer thinks these preoccupations are outdated and praises what she calls the “Trump Doctrine” for setting new priorities. She writes:

At the heart of the president’s vision is a desire to devolve European security back to European states and to disengage from the sands of the Middle East. Reducing American commitments in those two regions is paired with an activist approach to the Western Hemisphere, while playing hardball economic statecraft with Beijing. While the execution of this reorientation has been mixed and, in several cases, dangerously flawed, the Trump Doctrine is a much needed update to last century’s strategic status quo.

Europe has gotten the message. Furthermore, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has created a sense of urgency.

The Wall Street Journal‘s Bertrand Benoit recently published an article entitled Germany’s Secret Plan for War With Russia. The reporter got his hands on a 1,200 pages document setting out detailed plans to mobilize and provide logistical support for 800,000 German and allied troops in the event of an attack from Russia, which it projects may happen in 2029. It also sets our plans for an “all-of-society” approach to war, organizing civilians for resistance and guerilla actions. Such plans are in conjunction with Germany’s 100 billion euro ($116 billion) rearmament initiative.

Meanwhile, France has gone so far as to introduce “voluntary military conscription” to enlist 18 and 19 year olds in 10 months of service, with an emphasis on combat training, as part of the country’s efforts to be ready for a war by 2030.

Norway, Sweden, and Finland have already been bolstering their military forces and training their citizens for resistance. So has Poland. In contrast, in the words of an article by UK analyst Keir Giles, Britain Hits Snooze as Russia Threat Intensifies, with the deck, “There is now clear evidence that despite an acknowledged threat, the UK is extending its holiday from history.”

In Asia, Japan–despite its pacifist post-WWII constitution–is growing its military capability against the threat of China. So is South Korea. China’s announced target, Taiwan, modeling its strategy on Ukraine’s success in styming a much more powerful military power, is implementing a “porcupine defense,” using decentralized units and small, individually operated and hard to detect weapons systems to resist invasion.

Now, historically, it’s not good news when Germany (WWI & WWII), France (Napoleon), and Japan (WWII) militarizes, since all three countries have been threats to the whole world.

It’s surely healthy for nations to be ready to defend themselves, rather than expecting the U.S.A. to protect them. Some would say that a world filled with nations armed to the teeth is dangerous, since those weapons might not always be used merely for territorial defense. Then again, military deterrence and “peace through strength” have proven track records.

I myself question whether Russia is going to invade Europe in four years or less. Just as the U.S. has been giving the same level of assistance to the Europeans that it did before the Soviet Union fell apart, the Europeans may be assuming that Russia is as powerful as it was during the Cold War. Russia hasn’t even been able to conquer Ukraine, which would seem to be much less formidable than the NATO countries. And in trying to take over Ukraine, Russia has suffered a million casualties and used up a big part of its military technology.

China, though, is a much greater threat. It has dramatically built up and modernized its forces, including investing in cutting-edge military technology that rivals or even surpasses what the United States has.

Unlike these other countries, United States has not appreciably built up its military, though it is already powerful. Still, concerns have been raised. Mackenzie Eaglen of the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank, warns that The U.S. Can’t Handle a War. “From ships to shells to soldiers, the U.S. military lacks the personnel and matériel it needs to fight a major war.” She writes,

Over the past few decades Washington has traded a larger, more durable military force for one that is high-tech but brittle. Defense planners have made small quantities of expensive, cutting-edge weapons a priority over producing enough firepower for a long fight.This shift relied on advanced weapons having the power to end fighting decisively and quickly. Yet modern wars have evolved to require both advanced systems and sheer volume of 20th-century staple munitions, such as artillery shells and missiles.

Ukraine is using up to 15,000 artillery shells a day in its fight against Russia’s invasion. The United States produces only 40,000 shells each month.

The United States is also short on advanced munitions, such as precision-guided missiles. When America helped defend Israel from Iranian attacks late last year, our warships used a year’s worth of SM-3 interceptor missile production in a single night. Offensive strikes on Houthi targets in Yemen are likewise draining stocks of cruise missiles — the same kind that would be critical in a conflict in the Pacific. War games simulating a conflict with China estimate that the United States would run out of certain vital weapons, such as long-range anti-ship missiles, in as little as a week.

She expresses support for President Trump’s mandate and Defense Secretary (sorry, War Secretary) Pete Hegseth’s efforts to reform the Pentagon and beef up our military capabilities.

The U.S. has treaty commitments to come to the aid of any NATO country and it has informal agreements to come to the aid of Taiwan. But under the Trump doctrine, which may or may not survive the next presidency, that could change, though part of the Trump doctrine is being tough on China.

The deeper question is this: Short of a direct attack on American soil, do you think the U.S. would, or could, or should go to war to protect other countries?

Photo: Ceremony on the occasion of the 30th anniversary of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, via Centre for International Policy Studies, Public domain.

American foreign policy

American military capability

Asian preparations for war

European preprations for war

Trump doctrine

War

Previous Post

December 3, 2025

The Center of the Universe

Next Post

December 5, 2025 DISCUSS: Heritage Americans?

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"The why is that, according to Genesis 2, God chose it to be that way. ..."

Steve Bauer

Netflix Narnia Update

"But then, I am fortified once again by the brilliant observation of the philosopher king, ..."

Steve Bauer

The Secularization of Hell

"I agree. In the polis sense, the US is a shining city set on a ..."

Steve Bauer

The Secularization of Hell

"Men with nice butts need to watch out too."

Tom Hering

The Secularization of Hell

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Selah," found often in Psalms, likely mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Forever Give thanks Pause or reflect Sing loudly

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »