Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
Monday Miscellany, 11/3/25

Monday Miscellany, 11/3/25

Last updated on: November 3, 2025 at 6:00 am by Gene Veith

0 Comments

Monday Miscellany, 11/3/25 2025-11-01T07:21:05-04:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The Argentine free-market champion wins his election. Social contagion is real. And canceled professors are winning their lawsuits against woke universities.

The Argentine Free-Market Champion Wins His Election

We’ve blogged about Javier Milei, the president of Argentina who has been administering free market shock therapy to his nation’s dysfunctional economy.

His tactics of slashing government spending, laying off government workers, dropping price controls, ending protectionist trade policies, and deregulating the economy brought down the monthly inflation rate from 25% to 1.5% and causing the Argentinian economy to grow at a rate of 7.7%.

But such reforms were painful, especially in a country used to the socialist policies pushed by the late former dictator Juan Peron and his successors. Milei’s popularity seemed to have declined, he had only a narrow margin in the legislature to work with, and some of his reforms didn’t seem to be working.

He was widely thought to be in political trouble, to the point that President Trump tried to bail him out with a $20 billion currency swap, a promise of $20 billion more in private investments, and, most controversially, a plan to import more Argentinian beef, which has many of his rural supporters up in arms.

But in Argentina’s recent multi-party parliamentary election, President Milei’s Freedom Advances party defied the polls and expert predictions by winning 41% of the vote, doubling his party’s representation. Now he controls at least a third of the representatives in both houses of parliament, preserving his veto power and his ability to keep his reforms in place.

Social Contagion Is Real

In Sweden, between 2008 and 2018, the number of 13-17-year-old girls diagnosed with gender dysphoria jumped 1,500%. In 2020, Penn State researcher Colin Wright linked to the article giving those figures and added a comment: “Two words: social contagion.”

For those two words, Wright was vilified, canceled, and blackballed as a “transphobic” bigot. “My academic career never recovered,” he said. But he was alluding to a separate body of research that argued that the recent huge increase in the number of young people claiming to be transgendered “was best explained by social contagion, meaning the spread of ideas or behaviors through peer influence. The term isn’t an insult; it’s a well-established sociological concept used to describe how trends such as eating disorders and even suicide clusters can spread.”

Now even more evidence has come to light of how social contagion contributes to the transgender phenomenon. Wright has written an article for the Wall Street Journal about this entitled Evidence Backs the Transgender Social-Contagion Hypothesis.

Against this view, cultural progressives have been arguing that gender identification is an innate characteristic, even when that identification is contrary to the “gender assigned at birth.” The growth in reported cases, according to this view, comes from the stigma against that sort of thing removed. All of those Swedish girls were always “gender-non-comforming.” Now they are just feeling free to be open about it.

But now, as we blogged about, the percentage of young adults who identfy as trans or as non-binary has dropped dramatically. Observes Wright,

If transgender identity were an innate trait, like left-handedness, we would expect identification rates to rise at first when it became socially acceptable, then plateau and remain stable at a fixed level. If the phenomenon were instead driven by social contagion, we might expect a boom-and-bust pattern: a spike followed by a rapid decline once the social forces driving it weaken.

And that’s what we are seeing. Wright does point out that the biggest drop is in the “non-binary” category, those who claim to be neither male nor female, or both, or something else, such as “demiboy,” “two-spirit,” or “genderfluid.” But those categories are also the largest cohort of the transgender movement.

The overwhelming majority of those driving the trans craze fall into the “nonbinary” category—adopting identities which are said to be neither, both, or somewhere between male and female. These include labels such as “demiboy,” “genderfluid” or “two-spirit.” These are social identities, not biological ones. Unlike left- or right-handedness, which describe objectively measurable traits, “nonbinary” identities have no anatomical or physiological referent. They are conceptual, political and responsive to cultural trends—hallmarks of social contagion.

The concept of social contagion can apply, though, to far more than the transgender phenomenon, such as the use of recreational drugs and the embrace of Islamic extremism on college campuses. We used to call it peer pressure.

Canceled Professors Are Winning Their Lawsuits against Woke Universities

“So strong is the gravitational pull of ‘wokeness’ that it has caused many college and university leaders to approve of appalling treatment of faculty members who dared to question the prevailing leftist orthodoxies,” writes George Leef for the James G. Marshall Center for Academic Renewal. “Fortunately, our legal system still protects the rights of professors against such mistreatment.”

His article Woke Witch Hunts Are Losing in Court tells about three recent cases in which faculty members who were professionally cancelled by their institutions for dissenting from the leftist party line were vindicated in court, costing the universities lots of money in court costs and damages.

One professor at Portland State replied to a tweet from the schools’ DEI division, “All men are created equal.” For that quotation from the Declaration of Independence, he was blocked from university forums. He sued to get access, a rather small assertion of his free speech rights, but the university spent half a million dollars to fight his lawsuit, only to lose the case and be forced to spend $193,000 more for the professor’s court costs.

Another professor at the University of North Texas wrote an article taking issue with another scholar who maintained that a particular musical theorist was racist and that his approach to musical analysis ““exists to benefit members of the dominant white race of music theorists.” The Texas professor, who edited a journal devoted to music theorist being attacked, defended him from the charge. For this academic debate, the professor was condemned as racist, his professional society threatened to expel him, and North Texas grad students and 17 out of the 23 music faculty demanded he be fired. The university had a hearing and convicted him of “unethical behavior” and took away his journal. The controversy started in 2019, but the consequent lawsuit dragged on. After a court ruled against the university’s motion to dismiss the case, it became clear to the university that it didn’t have a leg to stand on, so last summer the university settled the case, giving the professor back his journal and paying him $400,000, plus $325,000 to cover his legal fees.

Another professor lost his job at the Ohio Northern University School of Law, despite having tenure and a pristine academic record, simply for opposing the school’s DEI policies.

In all of these cases, Leef’s article notes that the universities–and thus since these are public institutions the taxpayers–had to pay the legal expenses incurred by their administrators. One would think that if the administrators themselves would be held liable for violating the rights of their faculty members, we would see fewer of these cases. Then again, universities have liability insurance and they give individual policies to their administrators. Any professor who sues them, though, doesn’t have that advantage. So it was a risk for these faculty members to sue. And their colleagues, hostile though they might have been, should thank them, as should all Americans.

free market economics

Previous Post

October 31, 2025

How the 95 Theses Ignited the Reformation of the Church

Next Post

November 4, 2025 The Progressives' Bible and Its Critics

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"VCRs, tape decks, and cassette players are all having a revival among a segment of ..."

Tom Hering

Luther on Tools

"As a (retired) lawyer I see potential liability from sharing things like power or sharp ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

"I am not sure the items you mentioned, though disused, discontinued, discarded, could be considered ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

"“Friend, use me in your relations with your neighbor just as you would want your ..."

DakotaLutheran

Luther on Tools

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does the voice in Revelation 6 say about food prices?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Free food for all A day's wages for a measure of wheat Food will be multiplied No one will go hungry

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »