Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

geneveith

Half of Internet Content Is Now “AI Slop”

Last updated on: November 7, 2025 at 6:00 am   by Gene Veith

0 Comments

Half of Internet Content Is Now “AI Slop” 2025-11-03T21:34:13-05:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Half of the content on the internet is now AI-generated.  An AI entrepreneur takes it further, saying, “We believe that in the near future half the people on the planet will be AI.”

The phenomenon has given rise to a new term for AI-generated material:  slop.

Tech reporter Frank Landymore breaks the news about what has happened to the online realm in his Futurist article Over 50 Percent of the Internet Is Now AI Slop, New Data Finds.  The research used an AI-detector that classified an article consisting of more than 50% of material written using a large language model as AI-generated.  Actually, says Landymore, there is some good news here.  The percentage, now at 52%, is actually down a bit and seems to have plateaued.

The fact is, AI-generated slop isn’t working very well on the internet.  Says Landymore,

It may be because AI content farms are realizing that their shoddy slop isn’t being picked up as much by search engines and chatbot responses, with the firm finding 86 percent of articles in Google Search were written by humans, and only 14 percent AI.

It is indeed good news that articles found on Google are mostly written by human beings.  Too bad that many online users have switched to AI to do their searching.

An example, though, of AI slop populating the internet is real estate listings.  Not only are realtors using AI to write their sales copy on how great the house is, some are using AI to edit and drastically enhanced the photographs of the property.

Tanya Chen at Slate quotes one real estate shopper:

DeAnn Wiley was on the hunt for a new rental in Detroit earlier this month when she had the displeasure of arriving at a property that looked nothing like what was advertised online.

The photos made the home look brand new, only to get there and see the usual wear and tear and the old ‘landlord special,’ ” she told Slate. She tweeted the stark, even hilarious differences between what was posted and what she saw in person.

Her listing appeared to show a pristine, albeit A.I.-generated, house with smooth textures, clean walls and windows, a nice green lawn, and a bench out front under bucolic lighting. However, the photo she said she took in person showed a much shabbier house, featuring uneven grass and cluttered with yard equipment where the bench was supposed to be.

The practice is becoming pervasive.  Says Chen, “In recent months, homebuyers, renters, real estate agents, and photographers have noticed an uptick in A.I.-rendered images in listings—some with fake staging and altered details, and others that seem to show entirely different houses.”  Supposedly, realtors have kept this out of their “multiple listing service” (MLS), the proprietary digital database they use to sell properties.  But don’t buy sight unseen a home you see on online public sites.

Another attempt to monetize slop is a new company called Inception Point AI that is planning to put out thousands of podcasts that are completely and apparently quite openly generated by AI.

Inception Point boasts that it can produce each episode across more than 5,000 of its podcast shows for $1 or less each.

That means that if only 20 people listen to an episode, the company — which is currently bootstrapped and has yet to pay out salaries to its employees, according to the Reporter — claims it could turn a profit.

Whether anybody wants to listen to robots drone on about a subject is an untested question. . . .

For its podcasts, the Inception’s AI chooses topics based on Google data and social media trends, according to the Reporter. It then launches five different versions of each show to see if any of them stick. To double down on search engine optimization, some of the podcasts’ titles are extremely basic, such as “Whales,” a show about whales. . . .

“We might make a pollen podcast that maybe only 50 people listen to, but I’m already at unit profitability on that, and so then maybe I can make 500 pollen report podcasts,” [CEO Jeanine Wright] told the Reporter.

“Besides pumping out thousands of AI podcasts,” says Futurist‘s Victor Tangermann, “Inception Point also aims to turn AI-generated personalities into influencers on social media.”

To Wright, it’s a given that human creators will be replaced — a fate she thinks should be celebrated and capitalized on, not feared.

“We believe that in the near future half the people on the planet will be AI, and we are the company that’s bringing those people to life,” she told the Reporter.

A long, thoughtful article by Seth Fiegerman and Carmen Reinicke in Bloomberg entitled Why Fears of a Trillion-Dollar AI Bubble Are Growing analyzes the financial problems of the AI industry.  It also brings up another kind of slop:  workslop.

The article cited a study from MIT that found that 95% of organizations that have invested in incorporating AI into their operations have seen zero returns.

More recently, researchers at Harvard and Stanford offered a possible explanation for why. Employees are using AI to create “workslop,” which the researchers define as “AI generated work content that masquerades as good work, but lacks the substance to meaningfully advance a given task.”

The promise of AI has long been that it would help streamline tasks and boost productivity, making it an invaluable asset for workers and one that corporations would pay top dollar for. Instead, the Harvard and Stanford researchers found the prevalence of workslop could cost larger organizations millions of dollars a year in lost productivity.

Illustration by Ron Mader via Flickr, CC BY-SA 4.0

 

Economics

technology

AI

AI slop

Internet content

podcasts

real estate ads

workslop

Previous Post



November 7, 2025

DISCUSS: Would You Knowingly Listen to an AI Podcast?

Next Post



November 10, 2025 Monday Miscellany, 11/10/25

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"So Katie Zacharia lasted only a deciScaramucci as press secretary......"

reg


Luther on Tools

"Apropos to the post on Gen Z a couple days ago: "If you want the ..."

Steve Bauer


Luther on Tools

"“Don't eat with your hands, son, use your entrenching tool.”"

reg


Luther on Tools

"You serious, Clark?"

reg


Luther on Tools


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What Christian group is known for its historic peace churches and pacifism?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Quakers Pentecostals Methodists Presbyterians

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »

Related posts from Cranach

Family

Luther on Tools

Cranach

Family

Monday Miscellany, 10/12/26

Cranach

Family

Our New Book on Technology & Vocation

Cranach

Family

Why AI Bots Don't Really Have Emotions

Cranach

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

Swimfan: Forgotten Aughts Pleasures

This is a recovery effort. In 2002, My Big Fat Greek Wedding...

Top Three Anti-Catholic Lies About Catholicism

  This is my initial transcript for the video, "THE 3 WORST...

Pope Leo Celebrates Mass for Nurses & Docs...

I don't have any idea how he did it, but Pope Leo...

The Sermon on the Mount, Part I: Matthew...

The Sermon on the Mount, Part I (Matthew 4:12-5:12) St. Matthew moves...

What's up from Crossway

What's up from Crossway: Reviewing some of their latest A few weeks...

Janie Learns the Way of the Cross: A...

Teaching children about Jesus' Passion can be challenging. Many parents and educators...

view all Evangelical blogs

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube