Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
The Faith-Religion Cycle

The Faith-Religion Cycle

Last updated on: April 25, 2025 at 6:00 am by Gene Veith

0 Comments

The Faith-Religion Cycle 2025-04-21T08:19:08-04:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Yesterday we blogged about what appears to be a religious cycle, in which countries vacillate between times of religious indifference to times of intense religious commitment. I came across another discussion of religious cycles that is somewhat different. I disagree with the study’s applications and conclusions, but, looking at their findings from a different angle, I find it illuminating.

The useful website Study Finds, which tracks the latest research in various fields, posted a report entitled Why More Americans Believe in God—But Not Religion. Researchers found that while church attendance and affiliation has been plummeting, belief in God, spiritual reality, and various religious practices such as prayer and meditation are still very high.

They conclude that the contemporary world is not becoming secularist. Rather, religion is just changing.

Throughout history, religious movements have often begun as challenges to established systems before eventually becoming institutions themselves. The research team sees today’s shift as part of that recurring pattern: people rejecting what they view as rigid, politicized religious structures while seeking more authentic forms of spiritual connection. . . .

The researchers developed a concept they call the “faith-religion cycle” to explain these patterns. Rather than seeing religious change as a straight line toward greater secularization, they propose a pendulum that swings between institutional religion and more individualized faith expressions throughout history.

This framework challenges assumptions about inevitable secularization. Instead of simply becoming less religious, many young Americans are finding new ways to engage with spirituality outside traditional structures – similar to how religious reformers have done throughout history. . . .

What we’re witnessing isn’t the death of religion but its transformation. Young Americans are crafting spiritual identities that prioritize authentic self-expression and moral consistency over institutional loyalty – breaking free from bureaucratic structures while still seeking meaning, purpose, and connection.

For the original study, published in the sociology journal Socius, see Breaking Free of the Iron Cage: The Individualization of American Religion.

Now the study fixates on individualism, neglecting the communal dimension of church-going, and it ascribes the desertion of institutional religion to LGBTQ issues, while half-way admitting that mainline liberal Protestant denominations are all in on the LGBTQ cause, but they are shrinking faster than any other church body. The study attributes that to the mainliners still being “bureaucratic,” which is out of synch with the emotional orientation of people today, which evangelicalism–despite its conservative politics–does appeal to. The study’s historical survey is perfunctory.

So let me help the researchers out by supplying some historical examples of “people rejecting what they view as rigid, politicized religious structures while seeking more authentic forms of spiritual connection” and “religious movements [beginning] as challenges to established systems before eventually becoming institutions themselves.”

But I would propose this additional thesis: Established systems don’t go away when they provoke reform movements. Rather, even though the reform movements go their separate ways, the established systems tend to change, either because of the influence of the reform movements or resistance to them.

The obvious example would be the Reformation. Medieval Catholicism had become bureaucratic, impersonal, and ossified. Luther offered “more authentic forms of spiritual connection.” Contrary to how it’s usually described, Luther didn’t break away from the Catholic church; rather, he was excommunicated–thrown out of the Catholic church–which meant the formation of new ecclesiastical structures.

On the Catholic side, though, the Reformation gave birth to the Counter-Reformation. Many of the abuses Luther attacked–such as the selling of indulgences, the moral and financial corruption of the clergy, and the lack of education of the priesthood –were addressed and put a stop to by the Counter-Reformation. At the same time, the Council of Trent reacted against Reformation theology in a way that more clearly codified what the Roman Catholic Church believed, such as the authority of the pope, the role of good works in salvation, and the nature of the sacraments.

Nevertheless, to counter the Reformation, the Catholic church created a new emphasis on individual, personal piety. Many elements that have become definitive of Catholic devotion–sacramentals (rosaries, holy water, and other “holy objects), meditations, the pursuit of mystical experiences, the standardized “Tridentine” (which comes from the Latin for “Trent”) Mass–became prominent among the laity over after the Counter-Reformation. An especially significant example is frequent, even daily, reception of Holy Communion. In the Middle Ages, the laity might receive the sacrament once or twice a year, otherwise just watching the priests consecrate and consume the sacrament.

To trace this tendency in my own tradition, the new Lutheran churches flourished–theologically, artistically, intellectually, musically–in the late 16th and 17th centuries, which became the “golden age of Lutheran orthodoxy.” Then arose a reaction, the Pietist Movement, which opposed “dead orthodoxy” and stressed a more personal, less institutional piety. The established church opposed that, and yet the Lutheran “Awakening” of the 19th century, the revival of confessional Lutheranism that would lead to the migrations that would form the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod, offered a more personal faith like the Pietists called for.

Meanwhile, in England, the Anglican church became ossified, but then John Wesley brought back a personal faith, which led to the Methodist Church but also to evangelical Anglicanism. In America, the major denominations churches became somewhat stagnant, but the revivals of the various Great Awakenings not only won many fervent converts, but inspired many of the major denominations to emulate revivals in their worship services.

I’m sure the modernist theologians of the 20th century felt they were offering “more authentic forms of spiritual connection” to the old-fashioned churches of their day, giving us the reforms of Vatican II among the Catholics and the social and psychological gospels of Mainline Liberal Protestantism. But reaction against them led to the evangelical movement, which offered that personal faith that the liberals were trying to demythologize. Not only that, the evangelicals, in combating the liberals, grew in their intellectual and organizational sophistication.

To go back to the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod, the denomination’s conflict with its own liberal theologians in the Seminex walkout (who felt they were offering “more authentic forms of spiritual connection” to old-fashioned, out of date Lutheranism), led to a greater defining and strengthening of confessional Lutheranism.

Today, confessional Lutheranism is also being challenged as too old-fashioned from another direction by non-denominational evangelicalism, the church growth movement, contemporary worship advocates, and other trends of “conservative” Christianity in its contemporary forms.

To what extent should today’s LCMS be influenced by these movements and to what extent should it resist them? Should we too be more “non-denominational” in playing down our doctrinal distinctives and imitating the megachurches? Should we throw out our Lutheran liturgy and bring in the guitars, drums, praise songs, screens, and the other conventions of contemporary worship like everybody else? Some pastors and congregations think we should, or at least to a certain extent.

Or should the LCMS resist this “reform movement”? It seems to me that resistance is a type of influence, one that can benefit and even change an institution in a positive direction.

My impression is that due to the resistance to both the liberals and the evangelicals, confessional Lutheran congregations are now more doctrinal, more liturgical, and more sacramental–all in line with the Book of Concord–than they used to be, even during the fight against Seminex.

Used to, LCMS congregations had Communion as seldom as once a quarter. Then once a month. When we joined in 1979, we received the sacrament twice a month. Today, I think it’s pretty much the norm, even among the more “missional” churches, to have the Sacrament every Sunday, as called for by Luther and the Confessions. (See this.) That’s progress, in my opinion, a genuine reform that came from interacting with but saying “no” to these other reform movements.

And what about what this original study is saying, that the current religious reform movement can be seen in the Nones who are “spiritual, but not religious”?

Certainly, in Christianity the non-denominational movement reflects this anti-institutionalism while still keeping the church as congregations. We are also seeing a recovery of traditional Christian spirituality, as in the revival of the Latin Mass, especially popular among young adults, though strongly opposed by the Catholic bureaucracy. I think I am seeing this impulse also in other traditions, including Lutheranism.

Wait. I just realized I’m sounding like Hegel! Thesis brings forth anti-thesis, followed by synthesis. A movement brings forth its opposite, leading to a synthesis of the two.

For the record, though Hegel was a professed Lutheran, I renounce his pantheistic theology, his historical reductionism, and his overall philosophy. But maybe he was on to something about the history of ideas.

Illustration: Wilhelm Hegel (1831) by Jakob Schlesinger – anagoria, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=33762804

confessional Lutheranism

Counter-Reformation

Lutheran Church Missouri Synod

religious change

religious cycles

religious reform movements

Previous Post

April 25, 2025

DISCUSS: Should We Ban Drug Advertising on TV?

Next Post

April 28, 2025 Monday Miscellany, 4/28/25

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"“Friend, use me in your relations with your neighbor just as you would want your ..."

DakotaLutheran

Luther on Tools

"Archaeology: It's the case that we don't have to go back very far to discover ..."

DakotaLutheran

Luther on Tools

"Turns out, she wasn’t the right tool for the job."

1another

Luther on Tools

"You may have just given me my next sermon opening line."

1another

Luther on Tools

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who wrote many letters (epistles) in the New Testament?

Select your answer to see how you score.

John Paul Peter Jude

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »