Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
Monday Miscellany, 11/4/24

Monday Miscellany, 11/4/24

Last updated on: November 4, 2024 at 8:12 am by Gene Veith

0 Comments

Monday Miscellany, 11/4/24 2024-11-04T08:12:17-05:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Today’s Miscellany will be a non-political lull before the storm of Election Day on Tuesday. We will, however, have much to say on that topic tomorrow and the next day, as the election unfolds. . . .

For now: Medical AI is hallucinating; a salient question on transgenderism in sports; and a bunch more arrests in the UK for praying, thinking, and influencing.

Medical AI Is Hallucinating

One of the Artificial Intelligence applications being sold by OpenAI is Whisper, which is an AI-driven speech recognition program that can generate transcriptions of oral communication. OpenAI claims that it “approaches human level robustness and accuracy.”

So Whisper has been widely adopted to transcribe interviews, generate closed captions for videos, and other uses, from call centers to personal assistants. The medical profession in particular has adopted Whisper to transcribe patients’ consultations with their doctors.

Researchers, though, have found that the Artificial Intelligence that drives Whisper is unusually prone to hallucinations. A hallucination in AI has been defined as “confident statements that are not true.” That is to say, AI “may embed plausible-sounding random falsehoods within its generated content.” And sometimes these hallucinations–like those of a human mind on drugs or in a state of insanity–are truly bizarre.

A study of the use of Whisper in transcribing public meetings found hallucinations in 8 out of 10 transcriptions. An engineer studying machine learning examined 100 hours of Whisper transcriptions and found hallucinations in almost half of them. Another user generated 26,000 transcripts with Whisper, nearly all of which had hallucinations.

Some of them are unsettling, like a ghost–or demon–in the machine. One audio file recorded something saying this: “He, the boy, was going to, I’m not sure exactly, take the umbrella.” Whisper added this to the transcription: “He took a big piece of a cross, a teeny, small piece … I’m sure he didn’t have a terror knife so he killed a number of people.”

Some of the hallucinations invent extraneous information. A speaker described “two other girls and one lady.” Whisper, perhaps because its AI was programmed for DEI sensitivities rendered this as “two other girls and one lady, um, which were Black.”

In a medical transcription, Whisper came up with a medicine that does not, in fact, exist, that it called “hyperactivated antibiotics.”

Transcriptions of trials, hearings, police interrogations, and public meetings can have legal ramifications. Closed captioning for the deaf can convey important information that needs to be correct. Medical transcriptions, which often replace doctors’ notes, are crucial for diagnoses and treatments. Last month alone, Whisper was downloaded 4.2 million times, which means that untold numbers of incorrect transcriptions have already been made.

The problem is not just with Whisper. The Wikipedia article on Hallucinations (Artificial Intelligence) says, “by 2023, analysts estimated that chatbots hallucinate as much as 27% of the time, with factual errors present in 46% of generated texts.” That article is worth reading, both because it explains some of the technical reasons why hallucinations emerge and also because it gives a wide range of examples, some of which are quite humorous.

And, as I have complained on this blog, pretty much every time I have used AI to track down a quote or identify a source, it has responded with “confident statements that are not true.”

I know, I know, as my techie friend keeps telling me, AI will get better. So maybe we should wait until that happens before we start using it and depending on it so much!

A Salient Question on Transgenderism in Sports

Some people keep insisting that a person who is born a male (or “assigned” the male gender at birth) but who identifies as a female (perhaps having received some form of “gender affirmation” therapy) is, in fact, a woman, and, as such, is qualified to participate in women’s sports. That athletes who are transgender women-with-male-bodies typically dominate when they compete with athletes who have women’s bodies has occasioned some debate.

I came across an interesting contribution to this debate in a letter to National Review’s columnist Jay Nordlinger:

Also in yesterday’s column, I had a section on transgenderism. This included the question of women’s sports (the participation of biological males in them). A reader from Michigan writes,

I played volleyball competitively and coached female teams. Though I am sure some exist, I have never heard of a female identifying as a male who sought to compete in a men’s volleyball league. Why would this be?

Having a female body is a disadvantage in trying to compete on men’s teams. And having a male body in women’s sports? An advantage, and an unfair one.

Exactly! If men who identify as women are women, women who identify as men are men. But the latter do not want to compete against individuals with male bodies in the boxing ring, the swimming pool, or a track and field stadium.

(Yes, some females want to play on a boy’s baseball team or be a punter on a high school football team, but that’s not the same. They are trying to integrate the male team as females, in roles in which they claim their sex does not directly affect their performance.)

The transexual men realize that their women’s bodies would put them at a disadvantage competing against men with men’s bodies. By the same token, transexual women need to realize–rather, schools and athletic associations need to realize–that their men’s bodies would put them at an advantage competing against women with women’s bodies.

Why do we have to argue about this?

More Arrests in UK for Praying, Thinking, and Influencing

We blogged about the UK arresting people for silent prayer in front of abortion clinics. Well, it keeps happening. And it keeps going farther and farther.

The Free Press gives more details about those and related cases in an article by Madeleine Kearns entitled She Was Arrested for Praying in Her Head with the deck, “Citizens in the UK have been arrested, prosecuted, and convicted for silently praying outside abortion clinics. Even organizing pro-life meetings in your own home may be a criminal offense.”

Up to now, laws requiring a “safe access zone” around abortion clinics were mainly municipal ordinances, but as of October 31, England is implementing a nationwide law to that effect, a measure approved earlier by the independent legislatures of Scotland and Northern Ireland.

According to the language of the Scottish bill, which went into effect in September, it is now a criminal offense to do anything within 200 meters of an abortion clinic (the distance is 150 meters in England) that might have the effect of “influencing the decision of another person to access, provide or facilitate the provision of abortion services.”

The story tells about Father Sean Gough, a black Catholic priest, whom police interrogated after finding him standing outside an abortion clinic. “He was grilled on what message his clerical clothing had sent to [abortion] service-users within the [200-yard zone.” The police asked him if he was praying. He said he was. What about? He said he was “praying that God’s grace will come upon” those inside the facility. He was charged with “protesting and engaging in an act that is intimidating to service users.” He was arrested and tried, but was not convicted.

Another time, Father Gough was busted for having a bumper sticker on his car that read “Unborn lives matter” and for holding a sign that said, “Praying for Free Speech.”

A 64-year-old retired scientist named Livia Tossici-Bolt was arrested for standing outside an abortion clinic holding a sign that read, “Here to talk, if you want.” Her trial is pending.

When Scotland’s national law, which was approved with only one “nay” vote, went to effect in September, people who lived within that 200 meter radius were sent a letter. Kearns of The Free Press talked to a young woman who lived nearby and who sometimes invited fellow pro-lifers to her flat.

The letter informed her that her home is in the abortion censorship zone and explained that even “activities in a private place (such as a house) within the area could be an offence if they can be seen or heard within the Zone and are done intentionally or recklessly.” She was informed that an offender could be fined £10,000 (over $13,000). The letter also included a snitch provision: “You can report a group or an individual that you think is breaking the law,” adding contact information for doing so.

The UK already has anti-harassment laws that would cover the situations proponents of the law say they want to stop. But to date, there has not been a single complaint against pro-lifers for harassing anyone. In fact, the Free Press interviewed several women who said how they appreciated the presence of the pro-life volunteers, that they didn’t want an abortion but felt they had to, but were offered by the volunteers material help that led them to keep their baby. “They’re not forcing anyone,” said one of the women. “They’re just peacefully standing there. . . If you don’t want help, you can just ignore them and walk on.”

What the UK has criminalized is “influence.” It is a crime to influence a woman not to get an abortion. She supposedly has “choice,” and yet only the choice to have an abortion is protected. If she wants to make an informed choice, or just to hear the other side, no one within 200 meters of an abortion clinic is allowed to “influence” her.

Pro-abortion activists in the United States have pushed through similar “buffer zones” in Colorado, Massachusetts, Montana, and a number of cities (see this). But the longest such zone is only 100 feet–less than one sixth the size of the UK zone–and American civil liberties curb some of the restrictions.

Meanwhile, since the law has gone into effect, pro-lifers in the UK have measured how far the zones extend and set up their signs and tables just outside them.

abortion clinic buffer zones

artificial intelligence

hallucinations in AI

pro-life arrests in UK

transgenderism in sports

Whisper AI transcriptions

Previous Post

November 1, 2024

What Has Happened to Our Holidays?

Next Post

November 5, 2024 Election Day

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"VCRs, tape decks, and cassette players are all having a revival among a segment of ..."

Tom Hering

Luther on Tools

"As a (retired) lawyer I see potential liability from sharing things like power or sharp ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

"I am not sure the items you mentioned, though disused, discontinued, discarded, could be considered ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

"“Friend, use me in your relations with your neighbor just as you would want your ..."

DakotaLutheran

Luther on Tools

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was Jesus' first miracle?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Feeding the 5,000 Turning water into wine Walking on water Healing a blind man

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »