Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
Monday Miscellany, 11/18/24

Monday Miscellany, 11/18/24

Last updated on: November 18, 2024 at 6:00 am by Gene Veith

0 Comments

Monday Miscellany, 11/18/24 2024-11-15T18:30:26-05:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Are you sick of politics? I am, to be honest. We will return to other topics, never fear. But please bear with me in a final election-related Monday Miscellany. After today, no more political topics for the rest of week. So now we address the following topics:

What did NOT influence the election; the most pro-Trump racial group; and Catholics elected Trump.

What Did NOT Influence the Election

In understanding the news, it helps to reflect not only on what happened but what did not happen. The recent election was surprising not only for its results, but for its overturning of assumptions.

Money had little impact. Kamala Harris raised $997.2 million, whereas Donald Trump raised $388 million. Trump had far less than half as much to spend (39%) as Harris, and yet he won. In the words of a former Biden staffer, deleting the expletive, complaining about Harris’s campaign, “How did you spend $1 billion and not win?” Money and contributions from big donors are evidently not the factor they are cracked up to be.

The major news media propagandized in vain. Journalists in big media were unashamedly biased against Trump. Some of them openly called for pausing the usual objective standards of their profession and giving both sides of controversial issues in covering Trump, such was his “existential threat” to America. Their water carrying for Kamala Harris was almost embarrassing. Nevertheless, despite all of this free political advertisement, to add to what the Democrats paid a billion-dollars for, most of the public was seemingly unfazed, electing Trump anyway.

Demonizing Trump had little effect. The Democrats’ main strategy was to demonize Trump. Instead of offering distinctly Democratic solutions to the electorates’ problem, they tried to co-opt the Republican positions (we’re for lower taxes too! we also support fracking! we’ll build a wall!). Instead, they tried to scare voters with claims that Trump is an “existential threat” (there is that term again) to Democracy, that he will take away your freedoms, that he will impose a dictatorship, that he is a Fascist!

Trump has a lot of baggage, but most of the voting public is not afraid of him. After all, we survived his first term quite well. What’s more scary to most Americans is the spectacle of federal agents descending on your home and trying to put you in jail for bogus crimes. And people ginning up such hostility against you that you become the target of assassination attempts. Demonizing Trump to such an extent may have had the effect of making him sympathetic.

Abortion didn’t mobilize women to vote for Harris. The other issue the Democrats were counting on was promoting abortion at the top of their lungs, which was thought would turn out legions of women to vote for Harris. But Trump ended up winning 45% of the women’s vote, and more than half of white women (53%) voted for him. It turns out, not all women are in favor of abortion. And though it looks like most Americans are, overall, they did not believe that Trump would take that “right” away from them, since he himself was the one who sidelined pro-lifers. But if abortion is not the issue that both sides assumed that it would be, that should give pro-lifers some hope.

The Most Pro-Trump Racial Group

Progressives have put great store by identity politics, working hard to mobilize victim groups against their oppressors. Their attention has been primarily focused on sex (women oppressed by men), sexual orientation (LGBTQs oppressed by heterosexuals), and race (racial minorities oppressed by whites).

Imagine the shock on the part of racial reductionists to learn that the racial group most supportive of Donald Trump was American Indians! Nearly two-thirds of Native Americans (65%) voted for Trump. That is a bigger percentage than that of white people who voted for him (57%).

How could that be? If any group has a right to complain about oppression at the hands of white people, indigenous people being driven out by colonization, environmental degradation, poverty, and other tenets of progressive grievances, it would surely be Native Americans. And yet, they overwhelmingly voted for the nemesis of progressives.

Tribal people do complain about all of those things. But their need to hold onto their cultural heritage is the very definition of conservatism. And they chafe against the government bureaucracies that control what they are allowed to do on their own lands, despite the legal “sovereignty” that the government supposedly recognizes. The tribes are also trying to work their way out of crushing poverty, but the federal government often thwarts that. Yes, tribes sometimes object to industrial development of their sacred sites, but probably more often they want to take advantage of the mineral wealth their lands could produce, but the government doesn’t let them. Jim Geraghty explains:

Why did American Indians break so heavily in favor of Trump? Democrats may begin a lot of events and statements with “land acknowledgements,” but they’re not so supportive of letting America Indians do what they want on their own land. The Biden administration repeatedly put up regulatory roadblocks to American Indian tribes that rely on fossil-fuel production for revenues. Tribes facing some of the worst poverty in the country — lacking indoor plumbing and electricity — are residing on land with fortunes worth of oil and natural gas, coal reserves, uranium, as well as solar and wind. Not only is the Biden administration blocking development of fossil fuels on Indian land, it’s ironically trying to ram through wind and solar projects over some objections from the American Indian community.

I can confirm this from my experience in my home state of Oklahoma, which has the second highest percentage of Native Americans (13.37%) after Alaska (20.29%) and the second highest number (546,565) after California (1,009,450). A good number of the cars with tribal license plates, which registered members can have because of their tribe’s legal sovereignty, will have Trump bumper stickers.

Native Americans also tend to oppose illegal immigration. Raise the issue with them and you will often get a bitter comment about the problems Indians have had with immigrants pouring into America ever since 1492.

Catholics Elected Trump

In 2016, about 80% of evangelicals voted for Donald Trump, which was highly instrumental in the close election that put him in office. In 2020, about the same number voted for him again, but that was not enough to elect him. This time, once again, 8 in 10 evangelicals voted for Trump. No more than in 2020.

The big change, which may have produced Trump’s margin of victory, was the Catholic vote. In 2020, 52% of Catholics voted for their co-religionist Joe Biden, with Trump getting 47%. In 2024, 58% of Catholics voted for Trump, an 11% improvement, with only 40% voting for Kamala Harris. Among white Catholics, the difference was even greater: 61% for Trump and 35% for Harris. A good number of these Catholics who voted for Trump live in the crucial swing states of Wisconsin, Michigan, and Philadelphia.

So notes Newsweek. Paul Kengor of the National Catholic Register delves into the election and concludes in his article with this title, Donald Trump Can Thank Catholics for His Big Win. See also Mary Eberstadt’s First Things article Why Catholics Voted for Trump.

Commentators cite what comes across as Harris’s overt anti-Catholicism, as in her inquisition of a judicial nominee for belonging to the Knights of Columbus and her snub of the traditional bi-partisan Al Smith dinner, a benefit for Catholic charities.

More deeply, though, was her extreme advocacy and even celebration of abortion. I don’t think it puts it too strongly to say that Harris persecuted pro-life activists when she was the Attorney General of California, requiring pro-life pregnancy clinics to post advertisements for abortion providers and prosecuting the undercover journalist who recorded Planned Parenthood employees discussing their illegal sale of body parts from unborn children they killed. And as Senator and Vice-President she has been advocating removing the conscience clause that allows pro-life medical professionals to opt out of performing abortions on the basis of their religion or moral convictions. She wants to force pro-lifers to perform abortions!

I know that a majority of American Catholics (56%) believe that abortion should be legal in all or most cases, in flat out contradiction to what their church teaches. That’s not much different from the 63% of all Americans who believe that.

I would argue, though, that many of these Catholics–as well as many other Americans who support legal abortion–feel a certain cognitive dissonance on the issue. The supposedly devout Catholic Joe Biden has probably done more to promote abortion than any other president, but it is said that he hates to hear the word “abortion,” which is why he insists on framing it as “women’s reproductive health care.” Biden used to be pro-life, as most Catholic Democrats were, until his party turned in the other direction and began to ban dissenters on the issue. I am sure that his having sold out his beliefs troubles his conscience when he considers meeting his Maker. But Harris’s pro-abortion extremism, I suspect, made even pro-abortion Catholics uneasy.

Mary Eberhardt, who also cites other factors in what she sees as a growing Catholic self-confidence , concludes with this:

In the end, the 2024 election just might mark a turning point not only in national politics, but in the energy and self-understanding that Catholics bring to the public square. Given the Democratic party’s fierce rejection of certain bedrock teachings, the wonder isn’t that more American Catholics lined up for Trump-Vance. It’s that so many have tolerated being called haters and bigots, with little pushback, for so long. Religious voters are not a monolith, in the booth or anywhere else. And politicians, like princes, can and will break hearts. But in the historically wide margin handed to Trump-Vance, a phoenix of newly formed conviction seems to be rising.

Life Issues

Media

Politics

2024 Presidential Election

Catholics

Christianity and politics

Democratic political campaign

Donald Trump's victory

Native Americans

Previous Post

November 15, 2024

Did the Reformation End Twenty-Five Years Ago?

Next Post

November 19, 2024 How Christianity Invented the "Secular"

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"VCRs, tape decks, and cassette players are all having a revival among a segment of ..."

Tom Hering

Luther on Tools

"As a (retired) lawyer I see potential liability from sharing things like power or sharp ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

"I am not sure the items you mentioned, though disused, discontinued, discarded, could be considered ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

"“Friend, use me in your relations with your neighbor just as you would want your ..."

DakotaLutheran

Luther on Tools

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which city did David conquer and make his capital?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Hebron Jerusalem Bethel Gibeon

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »