Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
A Solution to Disinformation

A Solution to Disinformation

Last updated on: October 10, 2024 at 7:13 am by Gene Veith

0 Comments

A Solution to Disinformation 2024-10-10T07:13:02-04:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Ivy League researchers published an article in Nature claiming that, according to their study, conservatives do not get censored more on social media because of political bias but because they circulate more misinformation!

Well, that explains it! Never mind the possibility that opinions about what is misinformation and what is true information might themselves involve political bias!

The question of truth and how we know what is true has become a major problem today. Virtually everyone with access to a computer–which includes just about everybody–can post whatever they want on the internet, from gossip to paranoid fantasies, and it becomes part of the marketplace of ideas. But the problem is not just with technology. Our dominant philosophy today, taught in our elite universities, is that truth is a construction, something we make up for ourselves or that is made up for us by those in power to keep us in line. If the Ivy League researchers would have consulted with their colleagues in the humanities departments, they would have been told that pretty much every truth claim has a political bias.

So in today’s climate, information (facts), misinformation (incorrect facts), and disinformation (deliberately incorrect facts) are all jumbled together. This has given rise to “fact-checkers,” often employed by the news media and social media companies, to rule on what is to be accepted as factual. For social media companies, material classified as “misinformation” or “disinformation” is not just corrected or challenged, it is not allowed to be said. The post that fails fact-checking is taken down or restricted in its reach, and if posters continue to misbehave, their account will be suspended so that they will be “de-platformed.”

But what about freedom of speech? It is said that the Bill of Rights only forbids the government from restricting speech, but that private corporations may do so, and yet sometimes the government has been telling the private corporations what and whom to censor. You would think that the Ivy League humanities departments would follow their own logic in recognizing that the government, big corporations, and the educational establishment constitute a power elite that seeks to impose its own constructions of truth on a public it seeks to control. But they don’t seem to be applying their critical theories to themselves.

So what is the solution? A way forward is suggested by Andrew Stuttaford in a National Review article about former presidential nominee John Kerry complaining about the First Amendment as an obstacle to combating “misinformation.” He quotes economist John Cochran:

Much of the “misinformation,” especially regarding COVID-19 policy, turned out to be right. It was precisely the kind of out-of-the-box thinking, reconsidering of the scientific evidence, speaking truth to power, that we want in a vibrant democracy and a functioning public health apparatus, though it challenged verities propounded by those in power and, in their minds, threatened social stability and democracy itself. Do we really think that more regulation of “misinformation” would have sped sensible COVID-19 policies?

Instead of depending on a government “Disinformation Czar“–which the Biden administration actually put into place before cancelling the office due to public outcry–or a system in every social media company to prevent the spread of misinformation as the European Union is requiring, Stuttaford proposes taking advantage of our information technology to “crowdsource” truth. That is, allow the multitude of perspectives available online to correct and persuade each other.

“Crowdsourcing ideas to take advantage of the collective intelligence available online makes sense,” Stuttaford writes. “Insisting that there can be only one answer frequently does not.”

The internet is a democratized medium that can allow everyone their say. It thus makes possible a true marketplace of ideas. Instead of forbidding some information from being stated and heard, let the different truth claims contend with each other. The public can see for itself which one has the better evidence and the stronger claim. Crowdsourcing truth, as opposed to one entity policing it, unleashes the possibilities of free speech instead of restricting it, bringing multiple intellects to bear on a question.

This is the point the great Christian author John Milton was making when a similar debate arose over another information technology, the printing press, which the ruling elite wanted to censor: “Let [Truth] and Falsehood grapple; who ever knew Truth put to the worse in a free and open encounter?” This is from Milton’s 1644 tract on the subject, Areopagitica, which those trying to sort out these issues today should read and take to heart.

Illustration: John Milton (1629, when the poet was 21) by an anonymous artist via Store Norske Leksicon, public domain.

regulating social media

Previous Post

October 9, 2024

"Reformation Begins with Ourselves"

Next Post

October 11, 2024 DISCUSS: The Lesser of Two Evils?

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"I know wired earbuds are making a comeback (I never stopped using them as I ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

"VCRs, tape decks, and cassette players are all having a revival among a segment of ..."

Tom Hering

Luther on Tools

"As a (retired) lawyer I see potential liability from sharing things like power or sharp ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

"I am not sure the items you mentioned, though disused, discontinued, discarded, could be considered ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who dreamed of a ladder reaching heaven?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Abraham Jacob Paul Elijah

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »