Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
Why Tariffs Cannot Work

Why Tariffs Cannot Work

Last updated on: September 18, 2024 at 6:00 am by Gene Veith

0 Comments

Why Tariffs Cannot Work 2024-09-15T18:10:40-04:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A few weeks ago, we criticized a key part of Kamala Harris’s economic program in our post Why Price Controls Cannot Work. Now I’d like to criticize a key part of Donald Trump’s economic program: imposing a 10%-20% tariff on all imports, and a 60% tariff for all goods made in China.

This was the topic of Anne Bradley’s Religion & Liberty essay Toasters and Trade: How Misguided Policies Can Burn the American Dream from which we lifted her insights about vocation in yesterday’s post.

Her main purpose was to take issue with something vice-presidential candidate J. D. Vance said in a campaign speech: “We believe that a million cheap knockoff toasters aren’t worth the price of a single American manufacturing job. We believe in rebuilding American factories and rebuilding the American dream.”

Bradley, who is a Christian and a conservative and an economist, begins by unpacking insights from the pioneering free-market theorist Adam Smith, who showed the value of free trade in The Wealth of Nations. Among them are these:

First, we should never produce at home what we could purchase cheaper somewhere else. That would be imprudent. Second, “consumption is the sole end and purpose of production.” In a world of scarcity, we only use scarce resources to produce things people need and want. Production for its own sake is wasteful. This is a pro-consumer vision of the world. Rather than protecting producers, Smith saw that economic development hinged on directing scarce resources toward the needs of consumers, contra the prevailing theory of mercantilism, which Smith rejected as benefiting only a small segment of the public at the expense of everyone else.

In contrast, Vance, along with his fellow “post-liberals,” believe in mercantilism:

Vance believes that production is the end goal. If we make things here, we create jobs here, and that’s how Americans grow rich. It may sound good on the campaign stump, but this is why we must read and understand economics. We grow rich by making things at a relatively lower opportunity cost than others, which requires free trade.

Bradley explains, in depth, why Vance’s desire to use tariffs to keep out cheap toasters in an effort to build up American manufacturing jobs–which American presidents can impose without Congressional action– is wrong-headed. In doing so, she uses as an illustration the toaster industry. I urge you to read her analysis.

I would simply like to point out, in broader strokes, why tariffs, along with other protectionist economic policies, do not and cannot work:

(1) Tariffs raise prices. Trump has said that China will pay the tariffs, as if we are penalizing China while still allowing Americans to keep getting their cheap toasters. No, if the price of the toasters goes up 60%, importers will have to raise their prices 60%. The very purpose of tariffs is to raise prices. That way, American companies will be protected from competition. And without the downward price pressure of imports, the American companies can raise also their prices.

(2) Low prices benefit workers. America’s working class has a much higher standard of living than their counterparts in many other countries. This is because so many consumer goods that might be considered luxury goods in other economies are so inexpensive they are available even to Americans with lower incomes. If the goods sold in Walmart, many of which are “cheap imports,” were to go up 10%, 20%, or 60%, low-income Americans would be hurt.

(3) Tariffs hurt American exports. This is because countries that must pay tariffs for their products invariably retaliate by raising tariffs of their own. American companies may not make many toasters, but they do make products–ranging from wheat to high-tech machinery–that they need to sell to the vast markets overseas. Tit-for-tat tariffs that shut down our exports will devastate some of our most successful companies, resulting in huge job losses.

(4) Tariffs hurt the quality of American industry. It is never a good idea to shelter companies from competition, which not only brings down prices but also builds up quality.

Just as I am so old as to remember Nixon’s price controls, I can remember American automobiles in the 1960’s and 1970’s, back before free trade policies took hold in the Reagan era. Don’t get me wrong: those old cars looked great and are worth all of the nostalgia they evoke. But as automobiles, they were gas guzzling, inefficient, and backwards compared to what the European and Japanese automobile industry was turning out. When you bought a new American car–and it had to be American for most of us since the imports were tariffed out of most people’s price range–the “showroom tires” wore out in a few weeks and you almost never could approach 100,000 miles before you’d throw an engine rod or the transmission would go out. Japanese cars, on the other hand, could last well over 200,0000 miles, with much better fuel economy, performance, and fit-and-finish.

But once the trade barriers came down, American automobile companies had to compete with the Japanese and the Europeans, whereupon the quality of American cars improved drastically! Today’s American automobiles will easily go over 200,000 miles, and American automotive technology leads the world.

(5) Tariffs throw off American industrial capacity. If you order something that isn’t a book from Amazon, you will notice that it often comes with a notice that it is “made in China.” The same is true, again, if you shop at Walmart or an equivalent big box store. If we were to erect a great trade wall to shut China out of the American market–as the Great Wall of China tried to shut out the barbarians–do you think American industry could or would fill the void?

If American companies could make toasters profitably, they would already do so. The challenges of making and selling products in a greatly shrunken market –limited to Americans alone–would make it even harder.

America, it has been said, has a “post-industrial economy.” That is, it isn’t so dependent on manufacturing as it used to be. But we have a strong economy with, by global standards, a low unemployment rate. Our economy isn’t geared to making toasters, toys, and plastic utensils any more. It would take a long time to retool for American companies to fill the Walmart shelves, and even if they could, it would arguably be a step backwards for the American economy.

I do realize that trade has its tradeoffs. I hate to see the boarded up factories in our nation’s “rust belt.” And when a worker overseas makes in one day what an American worker would make per hour, of course a company will farm out its production overseas, putting American workers out of a job. That’s tragic. But the problems of those shut down factories go beyond what tariffs would protect them from.

Bradley says that American workers are five time more productive than their counterparts in low-wage countries. They can be put to better use, with the help of American technology, than making toasters. And their greater productivity can and should manifest itself in higher wages.

Under Donald Trump, the American economy and American workers thrived, not because of tariffs but because of reduced taxes and the removal of unnecessary stifling regulations. More can be done, but the answer isn’t to protect companies from competition, which helps the big corporations more than it helps their workers.

“We can avoid harming the working class by not manipulating trade and production patterns based on fallacies about how the economy works,” concludes Bradley. Rather, she says, “let’s support workers by increasing their opportunities, which means more market freedom—and more outsourced toasters.”

Illustration: UK political poster, 1906. “Liberal Party poster clearly displaying the differences between an economy based on Free Trade and Protectionism. The Free Trade shop is full to the brim of customers due to its low prices whilst the shop based upon Protectionism has suffered from high prices and a lack of custom.” Via Picryl, public domain.

Economics

Politics

economic protectionism

free market economics

free trade

tariffs

Trump's economic policy

Previous Post

September 17, 2024

"Everyone Has a Vocation, But Not All Have Jobs"

Next Post

September 19, 2024 "What Does It Matter in Light of Eternity?"

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"AI fatigue for me!"

reg

When to Use AI and When ..."

"AI are better chess players than almost anyone in the world. If we want to ..."

Tom Hering

When to Use AI and When ..."

"That wasn't my intended application. Self-driving cars are a different kind of AI, designed for ..."

David N. Gray

When to Use AI and When ..."

"Part of the problem, at least for me, is that I really don't understand what ..."

DakotaLutheran

When to Use AI and When ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What sacred tent did God command the Israelites to build?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Tabernacle House of David Booth Temple

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »