Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
The Future of Our Political Parties

The Future of Our Political Parties

Last updated on: August 8, 2024 at 6:00 am by Gene Veith

0 Comments

The Future of Our Political Parties 2024-08-02T17:33:07-04:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

What will happen to American political parties after one of them wins and the other one loses the upcoming presidential election?

Natan Ehrenreich has a provocative theory. Call it winning by losing. He has written an article for National Review entitled How the Losing Party in This Election Could End Up Controlling the Next Era of American Politics. It’s behind a paywall, but here is his argument. . . .

If Harris loses and Trump wins, that would mean the end of woke identity politics in the Democratic Party, while Republicans would double down on Trumpism. In that event, a sane-seeming, FDR-JFK-LBJ kind of old-school pro-American liberalism would easily beat the next generation of Trump-style Republicans, setting up an “era” of success for the Democrats.

Conversely, if Harris wins and Trump loses, that would mean the end of Trumpism in the Republican Party, while Democrats would double down on woke identity politics. In that event, a sane-seeming Eisenhower-Reagan limited government conservatism would easily beat the next generation of woke Democrats, setting up an “era” of success for Republicans.

Thus, whatever party loses the next election will be in a position to dominate American politics for a long time.

If this were to be true, Republicans should be voting for Democrats and Democrats should be voting for Republicans. I see some other problems with this hypothesis.

First of all, it assumes that the losing party would purge its ranks of the losing ideology. But party leaders are pretty entrenched. And both the leadership and the base of both parties are populated with ideologues who would rather be ideologically pure than win elections. Otherwise, why not shift their party’s message now?

Also, Ehrenreich assumes that neither party will have sustainable success once it gets in power. If Trump makes America great again, surely now-great Americans would continue to choose the party that carries on his legacy, even against old-school Democrats. And if Harris gets elected, that might be because America has become a woke nation and will continue to be so.

And there are other reasons why a party once in power might stay in power. Democrats are stirring up the fear that if Trump is put back in office, this may be the last election, that Trump will refuse to step down, rule as a dictator, and put an end to American democracy. Trump gave support for that fear when he told a gathering of Christian voters that after voting for him this one time, they “won’t have to vote anymore.” (He later explained that he was talking to infrequent voters, urging them to come out to vote this time, after which they could revert to their usual non-voting habits.)

I don’t believe that a Trump dictatorship is his intent or is possible even if it is. I am more worried that if the Democrats win the presidency, the House, and the Senate, they could implement their agenda of granting statehood to Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico. By creating two more reliably Democratic states, they would have four more Senators, which could give them a perpetual majority in that body. And they could also pack the Supreme Court by adding enough liberal justices to outvote the current majority of originalists on the court, removing a check and a balance on their power. The result could be a one-party government, like California already has, which could become very difficult for even an old-school Republican party to break through. And they could impose their progressive ideology with no restraints.

Finally, it appears that the Republican Party, even though Trump is its standard-bearer, is already rebranding itself to appeal more to the mainstream. In the course of a thoughtful discussion of Christians’ involvement in politics, Randall Fowler makes this observation:

Among many other things, the 2024 Republican National Convention marked the triumph of Log Cabin Republican attempts to purge the GOP platform of any references to traditional understandings of marriage, sexuality, and the human person. The Republican Party is visibly distancing itself from Christianity and social conservatives. And all pro-life language and policy stances on abortion have been removed from the party platform as well. In isolation, each of these moves may not represent a wholesale abandonment of Christian voters, and not all Christians agree on issues of abortion or marriage, but they collectively convey a party doing its best to rebrand itself in accord with prevailing secular norms.

Click the links for the evidence of what he asserts. Fowler, a professor at Abilene Christian University, says that Christians in politics want to be prophetic, but they keep playing different prophetic roles:

Republican Christians post-Moral Majority have typically wanted to be Moses (laying down the law) or Samuel (anointing the king). Our marginalization in the post-Trump GOP marks the end of that dream, although we are not yet Elijah consigned to the wilderness. Perhaps our model should be Nathan—the conscience of the kingdom, capable of rebuking the king when he falls astray but not estranged to the extent he is barred from the royal court. Doing this will require a renewed vigilance to ensure the spiritual health, theological seriousness, and moral formation of our own churches. May we be faithfully prepared for such a time, for it is coming soon.

In Ehrenreich’s terms, if both Democrats and Republicans revert to a more “normal” perspective, what that might mean is a single dominant ideology. It would be secularist, morally and culturally permissive, pro-abortion, opposed to free market economics, unrestrained in government spending, and championing big government. The parties would both agree on all of that, but would disagree on details. To see what that looks like, see Great Britain, where the Conservative Party has become almost as liberal as the Labour Party.

Christians who care about their vocations as citizens may have to emulate yet another prophet: Daniel in exile.

Illustration: Belshazzar’s Feast by Rembrandt – www.nationalgallery.org.uk : Home : Info, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=67423

Government

Politics

Vocation

2024 Presidential Election

Christianity and politics

Democratic Party

Republican Party

Previous Post

August 7, 2024

Forced Criminality

Next Post

August 9, 2024 DISCUSS: Christianity and the American Identity Debate

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Apropos to the post on Gen Z a couple days ago: "If you want the ..."

Steve Bauer

Luther on Tools

"“Don't eat with your hands, son, use your entrenching tool.”"

reg

Luther on Tools

"You serious, Clark?"

reg

Luther on Tools

"And all tools are made of media, thus making language and literature a tool (see, ..."

Steve Bauer

Luther on Tools

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which letter of Paul is addressed to a slave owner about a runaway slave?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Colossians Philemon Titus Galatians

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »