Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
A Catholic Shift from Transubstantiation to Real Presence?

A Catholic Shift from Transubstantiation to Real Presence?

Last updated on: July 26, 2024 at 6:40 am by Gene Veith

0 Comments

A Catholic Shift from Transubstantiation to Real Presence? 2024-07-26T06:40:36-04:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

While the Republicans were in Milwaukee, some 50,000 Catholics were in Indianapolis for the National Eucharistic Congress, the culmination of pilgrimages and processions across America following a consecrated Host. The goal is a “eucharistic revival,” described as “the joyful, expectant, grassroots response of the Church in the United States to the divine invitation to be united once again around the source and summit of our faith in the celebration of the Eucharist.”

The catalyst for this was two disturbing polls. In 2019, Pew Research asked Catholics what they believe about the bread and wine in Holy Communion, whether they believe that “during Catholic Mass, the bread and wine actually become the body and blood of Jesus.” Or whether they believe that the bread and wine used in Communion “are symbols of the body and blood of Jesus Christ.”

The first alternative is “transubstantiation,” which is the teaching of the Roman Catholic church, the view that the bread and the wine are changed into the body and blood of Christ. Their very “substance” is changed, though the “accidents,” the external appearance of the bread and wine remain. Quite literally, they “become” the body and blood of Jesus. But though this is the official and required dogma of the church, only 31% of Catholics said they believe that!

Conversely, 69% of Catholics–over two thirds–said they believe in the radical Protestant Zwingli’s position that the bread and wine are just symbols.

Not only that, a later survey by Catholic researchers in 2022 found that the percentage that believes in transubstantiation was little changed (35%), but it went on to ask the respondents what they thought the church’s teaching on the subject is. A majority of Catholics (51%) believe that the church teaches that “Jesus is only symbolically present in the consecrated bread and wine.”

The bishops were shocked at this data. They launched a three-year program requiring special teaching about the Eucharist in every diocese, getting laity involved in vigils of adoration of the Sacrament, Corpus Christi processions, and other devotional exercises, all culminating in the National Eucharistic Congress in Indianapolis.

Recently, another survey went out, finding that the laity’s lack of sacramental knowledge might not be so bad after all. Vinea Research, a Catholic outfit, criticized the previous studies for using the word “become.” That is not the language the catechism uses, the organization claimed, or that Catholics are familiar with. So the new alternatives were these:

a. Jesus Christ is truly present in the bread and wine of the Eucharist

b. Bread and wine are symbols of Jesus, but Jesus is not truly present.

This time, when Catholics were asked about the “real presence” rather than transubstantiation, the findings seemed more encouraging. A full 69% said they believe in the real presence–the same percentage that said in the other poll that the elements were just symbols! Vinea concluded,

“[U]sing language more commonly understood by Catholics, Vinea’s research indicates that many more Catholics than originally thought have an authentic understanding of the core Catholic teaching of the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist,” the group said in a press release.

These findings are being hailed as evidence that, in the words of the title of an article on the subject, New study suggests more than two-thirds of Catholics believe the Eucharist is truly Jesus. No, this new study suggests that more than two-thirds of Catholics still don’t believe in transubstantiation. They believe that Jesus is present in the Eucharist, not that He is the Eucharist.

The “real presence” is not really a full “authentic understanding of the core Catholic teaching.” That’s more of a Protestant term, though it’s understood in different ways, used in Lutheranism but also in some Reformed traditions, such as Anglicanism, which speak of a real “spiritual” presence.

Conservative Catholics recognize that the Catholic teaching has to go beyond “presence” language. Peter M.J. Stravinskas makes that point and observes, accurately, that even Martin Luther had a stronger belief than the one suggested in the survey.

To be sure, we Lutherans sometimes speak of the “real presence,” but that’s insufficient to fully describe what we believe about the “sacramental union.” We have to always be able to say, along with Christ, “This is my body.” This is my blood.”

I read one Catholic theologian explaining that transubstantiation, which has to do with Christ’s body and blood, is what makes possible the real presence of the entire Christ, body and soul. OK. The terms can be used together. Similarly, the Lutheran’s sacramental union makes possible the real presence of Christ.

But much of the Catholic discussion of the eucharist on line, even among priests and theologians, is just “real presence.” Does this mean Catholics are drifting away from the doctrine of transubstantiation? Are they recognizing that this teaching is untenable, a quasi-Gnostic or docetic rejection of matter as an illusion? Cath0lic thinkers say much about the sacramental nature of the material world, but transubstantiation denies that: If the bread and wine no longer exist, but are just an illusory appearance, the capacity of the material realm to convey Christ is rejected, not affirmed.

Are Catholics coming around to the Lutheran position? Not really. Maybe they are coming closer to a “sacramental union” understanding of real presence. But for Lutherans, Christ’s presence is not the whole issue. The Small Catechism says of the Sacrament of the Altar, that “It is the true body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ under the bread and wine, instituted by Christ Himself for us Christians to eat and to drink.” “It is.” The Catechism goes on to say in answer to the question, “How can bodily eating and drinking do such great things?”,

Certainly not just eating and drinking do these things, but the words written here: “Given and shed for you for the forgiveness of sins.” These words, along with the bodily eating and drinking, are the main thing in the Sacrament. Whoever believes these words has exactly what they say: “forgiveness of sins.”

For Lutherans, the Sacrament is not a sacrifice we offer up to God, or a meritorious work, or a devotional offering, or something sinners need to stay away from, as in the Catholic system. Rather, it is the tangible Gospel, Christ’s body given “for you”; Christ’s blood poured out “for the remission of all your sins.” In Holy Communion, we thus receive Christ in faith. For Lutherans, the Sacrament is inextricably connected to justification by faith. I’m not seeing Catholics going that far.

Photo: Blessed Sacrament Procession, Cropped and straightened by JD; original photograph by Fennec., CC BY-SA 2.0 DE <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/de/deed.en>, via Wikimedia Commons

Catholic belief in the eucharist

Lutheran sacramental theology

Real Presence

sacramental union

transubstantiation

Previous Post

July 26, 2024

DISCUSS: Should Women Have to Register for the Draft?

Next Post

July 29, 2024 Monday Miscellany, 7/29/24

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"I know wired earbuds are making a comeback (I never stopped using them as I ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

"VCRs, tape decks, and cassette players are all having a revival among a segment of ..."

Tom Hering

Luther on Tools

"As a (retired) lawyer I see potential liability from sharing things like power or sharp ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

"I am not sure the items you mentioned, though disused, discontinued, discarded, could be considered ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

To whom did God give the commandments, engraved on stone tablets?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Peter Adam Noah Moses

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »