Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
Agatha Christie and the Mystery of Mysteries

Agatha Christie and the Mystery of Mysteries

Last updated on: June 28, 2024 at 6:00 am by Gene Veith

0 Comments

Agatha Christie and the Mystery of Mysteries 2024-06-22T15:19:03-04:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

There is a connection between the great mystery writer Agatha Christie, controversies among Catholics about the Latin mass, and the two senses of mystery.

I will explain this by roughly following the structure of a mystery novel. . .

The Setup

Traditional Catholicism is making a big come back, especially among young people, and it’s centered in the Tridentine Latin mass. So Pope Francis has been trying to squelch that by putting out a decree forbidding the use of that liturgy without a specific dispensation from the Vatican.

Some conservative bishops and priests, though, are disobeying their liberal pope by conducting the Latin mass anyway. Now a supposedly well-sourced rumor is circulating that the pope will ban the Latin mass completely.

We Reformation Christians don’t really have a dog in this fight. Luther supported worship in the vernacular, though Lutherans continued to celebrate the Divine Service in Latin sometimes. After all, Latin was the common language, the lingua franca, of Europe through much of the 18th century, so international meetings and, especially, academic gatherings were conducted in Latin. In fact, Latin was the vernacular in schools and universities. Luther simply wanted worshippers to understand what they were hearing and saying, and sometimes that required worship in Latin.

As for the mass, Lutherans are confessionally obliged to claim that for themselves. “Falsely are our churches accused of abolishing the Mass,” says the Augsburg Confession, Article XXIV, “for the Mass is retained among us, and celebrated with the highest reverence,” adding “Nearly all the usual ceremonies are also preserved.” To be sure, the Lutherans reformed the Roman mass by taking out prayers to the saints, the emphasis on merit, and other theological errors. But Lutheran worship remains liturgical.

Also, Pope Francis hasn’t restricted the use of the Latin language for the mass, as such. It’s still possible to say the modern order of the liturgy in Latin, as in any other language. What he is opposing is the Tridentine rite, which came out of the Council of Trent, a product not of the Middle Ages–the one that Luther knew–but of the Counter-Reformation. So it has even more things in it that Lutherans and other Protestants object to.

But Catholics, like Lutherans and other Protestants, have had their “worship wars,” and contemporary worship won out. To be sure, Catholic contemporary worship is still more liturgical than the typical evangelical praise service, but, since it was a product of Vatican II, its music and wording shows the influence of the Sixties, making it sound even more dated and, for conservative Catholics, sometimes cringeworthy.

So we Lutherans can sympathize with Catholics who love the pre-Vatican II Latin mass, with its rich language and its ethereal, beautiful music. And it isn’t just schadenfreude to see conservative Catholics, usually the most ardent defenders of the papacy, opposing their pope for undermining Christian orthodoxy. Now they know how Luther felt.

The Discovery

In 1971, Pope Paul VI was also considering banning the Latin mass. A number of British luminaries wrote the Pope a letter urging him to allow the Latin mass. Some of the signers were well-known Catholics, like Graham Greene and Malcolm Muggeridge. Others, though, were non-Catholics–such as Sir Kenneth Clark and poet laureate Cecil Day-Lewis–with even some non-Christians–such as the communist Philip Toynbee, the atheist novelist Iris Murdoch, and the Jewish violinist Yehudi Menuhin– joining the cause.

As K. V. Turley tells it in an article on the subject in the National Catholic Register,

In total there were 57 names attached to the letter that stated that its signatories were not preoccupied with “the religious or spiritual experience of millions of individuals”; instead, they wishes to highlight how “the rite in question, in its magnificent Latin text,” had “also inspired a host of priceless achievements in the arts — not only mystical works, but works by poets, philosophers, musicians, architects, painters and sculptors in all countries and epochs. Thus, it belongs to universal culture as well as to churchmen and formal Christians.” Their concerns regarding this rite were with what they believed to be “a plan to obliterate that Mass by the end of the current year.” Therefore, the signatories of the appeal wished “to call to the attention of the Holy See the appalling responsibility it would incur in the history of the human spirit were it to refuse to allow the Traditional Mass to survive, even though this survival took place side by side with other liturgical forms.”

The pope read the letter and looked over the names, most of which he probably didn’t recognize. But then he saw one that he did, the Queen of Crime. “He exclaimed: ‘Ah, Agatha Christie!’ and promptly agreed to the letter’s plea.”

Pope Paul VI signed what became known as the “Agatha Christie Indult” (meaning permission for an exception to church law), which preserved the Latin Mass.

The Funnel

So why did Agatha Christie want the pope to preserve the Latin mass?

We know that she was a high-church Anglican. Her husband was a Catholic, who continued to attend Mass even though he couldn’t receive communion because he married Agatha, a divorcee. She probably attended with him sometimes, though she also regularly attended her own congregation.

She didn’t write about religion per se, but her portrayals of clergy and the church are always quite positive. Hercule Poirot is a Catholic, and Miss Marple is an Anglican, with vicarages and vicars playing prominent roles in many of her stories.

Turley offers some speculations about her possible interest in Catholicism, such as her keeping her late mother’s copy of The Imitation of Christ by Thomas à Kempis by her bedside for the rest of her life. But that devotional classic would not be unusual for an Anglican or any other Protestant to read. It is evidence, though, that Christie was a believing Christian.

It so happens that I have been on an Agatha Christie binge lately. We’ve been streaming Poirot and Miss Marple, and they are so good, far beyond the typical detective fare, that I decided to read the books, which are often quite different from the TV dramatizations, as good as those are.

I had associated Christie with “cozy mysteries,” that subgenre in which little old ladies sit around drinking tea as they solve sanitized crimes. But her stories can be dark and disturbing enough for anyone who believes as she did in original sin, and this is especially true of those starring Miss Marple, a little old lady indeed, whose effectiveness in detecting murderers comes from knowing, as she says, how wicked people generally are.

And Christie is a brilliant writer! Yes, her books are entertainment, not psychological novels, but her characters come alive, her descriptions pop off the page, and her dialogue is full of wit and verve. But her genius is evident in her plots. Their twists and turns are dazzling.

Another aspect of her genius is that, as an early pioneer of the genre, she is creating the conventions of the mystery story, which are still evident to this very day in books, TV, and movies. But she also plays with those conventions–pushing them in new directions, turning them upside down, and even violating them–so that the reader is always taken by surprise.

You can get some of them on cheap Kindle collections, but these generally leave out the most celebrated novels such as Murder on the Orient Express and Death on the Nile, (When those collections say they are the “complete” novels, they are anything but, consisting of a few novels and many short stories.)

My favorites with Poirot are The Murder on the Links and The Murder of Roger Ackroyd, both of which left my head spinning. My favorite Miss Marple is A Murder Is Announced.

But what is the connection between Agatha Christie’s mysteries and her interest in Christian liturgy, not only in getting the pope to allow the Latin mass but in her own life as a church-going high church Anglican devoted to the Book of Common Prayer?

The Reveal

My friend the Australian theologian John Kleinig provides the clue. In his book God’s Word: A Guide to Holy Scripture, he writes,

Like many modern people, we tend to confuse mysteries with secrets. And so we explain them away. But a mystery is different from a secret. Even though both have to do with something that is hidden and unknown, a mystery differs from a secret in one important respect. A secret remains a secret only as long as you don’t know it. Once it is revealed, it ceases to be a secret. But a mystery remains a mystery even when it is revealed. In fact, the more you know about it, the more mysterious it becomes. (p. 126)

Agatha Christie writes about secrets, to be sure, but somehow her books, unlike so many others in the “mystery” genre, can be read with profit and enjoyment over and over again, even after you know “who dunnit.” This is because she evokes the mysteries of human beings, of ordinary life that is Miss Marple’s stage, and what the Bible describes as “the mystery of iniquity” (2 Thessalonians 2:7; KJV).

Among the mysteries that Kleinig cites–of which “the more you know about it, the more mysterious it becomes”–are Christ, meditation on Scripture, prayer (see his book Grace Upon Grace), and worship, specifically, the Divine Service, what Lutherans call the historic liturgy.

So no wonder the Queen of Crime would not only create fictional mysteries but that she would also treasure the mysteries of the church, expressing her sense of mystery by writing both stories for the public and a letter to the pope!

Photo: Agatha Christie plaque -Torre Abbey.jpg: Violetrigaderivative work: F l a n k e r, CC BY-SA 3.0 <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/>, via Wikimedia Commons

controversy over Latin Mass

Previous Post

June 28, 2024

DISCUSSION: From Bitter to Sweet

Next Post

July 1, 2024 Monday Miscellany, 7/1/24

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"I am told one only gets the $90 if one is on a Supplemental Medicare ..."

reg

On Trump’s Political Ads That You ..."

"I too don't think the $5,000 giveaway will happen, but only because the Trumpublicans won't ..."

Tom Hering

On Trump’s Political Ads That You ..."

"Well, large cash give-aways are generally bad policy, but really bad in any of the ..."

1another

On Trump’s Political Ads That You ..."

"Well, we think it pretty much fits my thesis, except I'm not sure whether all ..."

kerner

On Trump’s Political Ads That You ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I saw a vision of four living creatures with four faces—human, lion, ox, and eagle—beside wheels within wheels. Who witnessed this?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Daniel John Ezekiel Isaiah

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »