Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
A Policy Both the Left and the Right Are Pushing

A Policy Both the Left and the Right Are Pushing

Last updated on: June 25, 2024 at 6:00 am by Gene Veith

0 Comments

A Policy Both the Left and the Right Are Pushing 2024-06-19T19:42:31-04:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Our current political climate is highly polarized, with the left and the right not being able to stand each other and seemingly agreeing on nothing. And yet an issue has emerged that both sides are pushing: Preventing children from having access to information technology.

It seems like only yesterday–it was the 1990s, actually–when federal, state, and local governments with agreement from both political parties, education experts, and the general public were all about wiring schools for the internet, providing computers for every student, and lauding what the technology revolution will do for education. Now, as Derek Robertson points out, those forces are trying to pull the plug on all those screens.

Gavin Newsome, the arch-liberal governor of California–which includes Silicon Valley–wants to ban smartphones during the school day. His rival Ron DeSantis, the arch-conservative governor of Florida, has already done that.

Vivek Murthy, the Biden administration’s Surgeon General, is calling for tobacco-style warning labels to appear on social media platforms, warning young people and their parents that the technology poses a danger to their user’s mental health.

Gov. DeSantis has already signed a bipartisan bill that prohibits Florida children 14 and younger from having a social media account. Parents may sign consent forms for 15 and 16-year-olds, but even if they are okay with their kids having a Facebook account, that would be against the law, and online platforms must have rigorous age-verification processes.

Nationally, Brian Schatz, the Democratic senator from Hawaii, is sponsoring the Kids Online Safety Act and the Protecting Kids on Social Media Act, which would apply such restrictions nationwide.

President Biden signed a bipartisan bill that would ban TikTok, the Chinese-owned video-sharing platform beloved by young people, though this would not go into effect until after the election. As president, Donald Trump tried to do the same, but has since backed off, saying that while he considers the China connection a national security danger, banning the app would only empower Facebook.

Similar efforts to limit the access of children and adolescents to social media and cell phones are under way in other states, both blue and red.

Ironically, though the left and the right seem to agree on this issue, one would think that it violates the principles of both the left and the right!

It would seem that the government banning young people’s access to technology would go against the grain of the libertarian streak, both of “freedom caucus” Republicans and morally permissive Democrats.

Republicans have traditionally been pro-business, and Democrats have worked to become the party of the rich, cultivating especially a fund-raising alliance with Silicon Valley tycoons. But both sides seem unconcerned with the precedent of imposing age-restrictions for products that are legal and not immediately harmful.

Progressives value change and have traditionally lauded technology as part of the reason society keeps evolving to ever-greater heights. But now they want to rein in technology and keep it away from children, who, as they are always reminding us, are “our future.”

Could it be that the primal need to care for our children trumps all of that ideology?

If so, this is an encouraging sign.

While saluting the sentiment behind these measures, I myself have some qualms about them. Is it really the government’s role to police children’s internet usage? Isn’t this what parents should be doing?

Certainly, there are broader social costs to the dangers of children’s internet abuse, so one could make a case that the government should get involved. Clearly, parents as a whole are not being careful to monitor their children’s use of social media. So perhaps the government should rush into the void. I’m not totally convinced, though.

Perhaps parents want the government to play the role of the tough and protective parent so that they don’t have to. That’s not healthy.

The left has long favored a paternalistic view of government in which the state takes on the responsibilities–such as providing an income and taking care of the children–that traditionally belonged to the family. I’d be sorry to see conservatives taking up that same position.

But now that we have big government conservatives as well as big government liberals, perhaps this is something else that both sides are agreeing on.

Photo by cottonbro studio via Pexelshttps://www.pexels.com/photo/photo-of-people-engaged-on-their-phones-8088493/

bipartisan cooperation

children and social media

children and technology

laws restricting technology

Previous Post

June 24, 2024

Monday Miscellany, 6/24/24

Next Post

June 26, 2024 What Does "Establishment of Religion" Actually Mean?

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"I know wired earbuds are making a comeback (I never stopped using them as I ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

"VCRs, tape decks, and cassette players are all having a revival among a segment of ..."

Tom Hering

Luther on Tools

"As a (retired) lawyer I see potential liability from sharing things like power or sharp ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

"I am not sure the items you mentioned, though disused, discontinued, discarded, could be considered ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "The stone the builders rejected has become the cornerstone"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

David Isaiah Jesus Paul

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »