Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
The Two Irreconcilable Poles of the New Right

The Two Irreconcilable Poles of the New Right

Last updated on: April 11, 2024 at 6:00 am by Gene Veith

0 Comments

The Two Irreconcilable Poles of the New Right 2024-04-05T16:52:37-04:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

American conservatism in the 20th century–the era of William F. Buckley and Ronald Reagan–is often described as “fusionist.” That is, it was a joint effort of two very different political philosophies–traditionalism and libertarianism–who united against the common enemy of collectivism, socialism, and totalitarianism as embodied in Soviet Communism.

The so-called New Right of today consists of a different kind of fusionism, an alliance between two even more irreconcilable political philosophies: Roman Catholic integralism and Nietzschean “vitalism.” Though in many ways opposite, one being explicitly Christian and the other being explicitly anti-Christian, they have a common enemy in woke progressivism.

So argues a writer with the pen-name Cincinnatus Smith in an article for Quillette entitled Funhouse-Mirror Fusionism. We’ve blogged quite a bit about integralism, the project of imposing a Catholic political order under the temporal authority of the Pope. Smith describes “vitalism” in terms of the writings of the Romanian internet personality Costin Alamariu, also known as the “Bronze Age Pervert,” whose book Bronze Age Mindset has acquired a cult following among some conservatives. Here is Smith’ description of what it says:

[Bronze Age Mindset] is Nietzschean at its core. Justice is the will of the strong. Strength and vitality are paramount virtues. . . . Egalitarian ideals and democracy were incompatible with the idea that the strong shall rightfully rule over the weak. The individual great man was to be cherished. Moreover, much like Nietzsche, BAM’s message is directed to the few supermen capable of understanding it and giving themselves new purposes and ends to strive for. Alamariu makes this clear from the outset: the book is not philosophy, but an exhortation to this narrow few. It’s for the lost few who will make up the small piratical bands that will lay waste to the modern landscape of liberalism:

Here is my vision of the true justice, the justice of nature: the zoos opened, predators unleashed by the dozens, hundreds … four thousand hungry wolves rampaging on the streets of these hive cities, elephants and bison stampeding, the buildings smashed to pieces, the cries of the human bug shearing through the streets as the lord of beasts returns. . . .

For Nietzscheans like Alamariu, the chief problem with liberal modernity is not that it removes constraints on individuals, but that it’s too concerned with the many, who can and should be sacrificed for the good of the few. Contemporary elites promote a sterile form of individualism that treats victimhood as a virtue and masculine vitality as a cancer, which sedates their would-be competitors and buttresses their own power. Where modern liberalism insists on the inalienable natural rights of each person, Nietzschean individualism is for the few, not the many.

The many are derided as sub-human “bugs,” the implication being that they are worthy of extermination. He also believes in eugenics. All of this, of course, is the same Nietzschean mindset that, as I document, constitutes Fascism.

Though old-style conservative fusionism of traditionalism and libertarianism–with its support for the Constitution, traditional values, free-market economics, individual liberty, and small government–is still around, New Right fusionism pushes both of those poles to new extremes. Instead of a traditionalism that seeks to conserve American ideals and a culture built around church, state, and family, the integralists champion a more specific tradition: the Roman Catholicism of the Middle Ages. Instead of a libertarianism built around individualism and freedom, the vitalists champion the Nietzschean superman, the survival of the strongest, and the subjugation of the inferior.

Whereas the old fusionism is strongly pro-American, the New Right fusionism is anti-American. Both integralists and vitalists despise the Constitution and the human rights it protects. Both oppose democracy. Both dismiss the American experiment for its “liberalism.”

The integralist Adrian Vermeule, a Harvard Law professor (!), wants to completely reconstitute the United States of America and rename it the “Empire of Our Lady of Guadalupe.” The Bronze Age Pervert says that the only legitimate form of government is military dictatorship.

Vermeule’s solution to the immigration problem is only to admit Catholics. The Bronze Age Pervert’s solution is only to admit white people.

I would add that neither integralism nor vitalism can be reconciled with evangelical Christianity, whether of the Lutheran, the Reformed, the Arminian, the Baptist, or the Pentecostal variety. Bronze Age Pervert is explicitly anti-Christian, mocking as Nietzsche does its ethic of love and compassion. Integralism is explicitly Christian, but it is intrinsically anti-Protestant, blaming the Reformation (correctly, I would say) for leading to individual rights and liberal democracy. As I have shown, Protestants wouldn’t fare well under integralism. They would be among the “heretics” that a properly ordered government, according to the integralists, would be obliged to suppress.

Both of these new extremes are clearly off-the-wall fantasies, more suited to alternative reality games on the internet than actual political philosophies capable of being implemented and actually governing. (Integralists, how would you actually go about turning secularist America into the Empire of Our Lady of Guadalupe? And how would all of this work under a liberal pope like Francis? Bronze Agers, what makes you think that you are all that superior? Do you really think you would be among the supermen running your military dictatorship?)

The classic conservative fusionism of more measured traditionalists and more measured libertarians might have its tensions, but Smith says that these are the tensions in Western civilization itself. Individualism needs to be guided by virtue; and virtue needs to be freely chosen and not coerced. And that fusionism can govern, and it accomplished much, such as the dismantling of Soviet Communism.

Furthermore, I think the classic conservative fusionism can address today’s pressing issues. The dangers are still an all-powerful and all-intrusive government and the violation of individual rights. Democracy can still check the power of the social and economic elites. Traditional values can still build strong families, churches, and communities. And Christianity of all varieties can certainly thrive under our Constitutional order, as our history has proven.

Illustration: St. Thomas Aquinas and Friedrich Nietzsche, two public domain images via Edward Feser

Government

Philosophy

Politics

conservative fusionism

Previous Post

April 10, 2024

It's Mostly the Liberal Churches That People Are Leaving

Next Post

April 12, 2024 DISCUSS: The "Pre-War Era"?

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Yes. It used to be part of American exceptionalism that we expected better from our ..."

David N. Gray

Are We on Russia’s Side Now?

"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZgXNVA9ngx8"

Setapart

Are We on Russia’s Side Now?

"I never understood Halloween as an adult holiday or thing. Even as a young man ..."

reg

The Inversion of Our Holidays

"An aspect of Halloween not to be overlooked is the way that adults, over the ..."

Tom Hering

The Inversion of Our Holidays

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many chapters are in the book of Romans?

Select your answer to see how you score.

16 12 18 21

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »