Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
The Will of a Party vs. The Will of the Nation

The Will of a Party vs. The Will of the Nation

Last updated on: January 18, 2024 at 6:00 am by Gene Veith

0 Comments

The Will of a Party vs. The Will of the Nation 2024-01-13T14:16:51-05:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

As the election year gets under way, all agree that American politics is highly polarized. And yet most Americans do not agree fully with either pole. Nevertheless, they will have to vote for one pole or the other.

A new Gallup poll has found that 27% of Americans identify as Democrats and 27% identify as Republicans. A record 43% identify as Independents.

That two small minorities choose the candidates the rest of the nation has to choose from is a strange way to run a democracy. This calls to mind George Washington’s warning about political parties in his Farewell Address (1796):

They serve to organize faction, to give it an artificial and extraordinary force; to put, in the place of the delegated will of the nation, the will of a party, often a small but artful and enterprising minority of the community; and, according to the alternate triumphs of different parties, to make the public administration the mirror of the ill-concerted and incongruous projects of faction, rather than the organ of consistent and wholesome plans digested by common counsels, and modified by mutual interests.

However combinations or associations of the above description may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely, in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people, and to usurp for themselves the reins of government; destroying afterwards the very engines, which have lifted them to unjust dominion.

Government by faction. That is to say, government by a series of factions, one after the other. To the advantage of “cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men.” So that “the will of a party” takes the place of the “will of the nation.” If only we had obeyed the Father of our Country.

Peter Savodnik has written a fascinating article for The Free Press entitled The Great Scramble on how both political parties are failing to represent the beliefs and interests of a large segment of the American public. “Nearly half of Americans now identify as independent,” he writes, “not necessarily because they’re centrists, or moderates, but because neither party reflects their views.”

One argument for political parties is that they embody different philosophies of government that voters can identify more clearly where a candidate stands. But today the parties are not even doing that.

The parties have actually switched places, Savodnik shows, adding to our political confusion. He cites experts who have been studying the phenomenon:

[Yuval] Levin described two axes in American political life—one right-left, and the other insider-outsider. Traditionally, the party of the right has been the party of the inside—the establishment—and the left has fought for those on the outside—the poor, the disenfranchised.

“But in the twenty-first century, they’ve switched sides,” he said. “Democrats are the elites, and Republicans feel like they’re fighting the establishment.”

One way to think about it, said Michael Lind, author of The New Class War: Saving Democracy from the Managerial Elite, was geographic: “From Lincoln to Reagan, New England, the Upper Midwest and the Great Lakes, and the western states were the Republicans, and now they’re the Democrats—while the interior was all the Democrats, and now they’re the Republicans.”

Now the Democrats are the “party of the rich.” The median price of the home of a Hillary Clinton voter was $200,000 more than that of a Donald Trump voter. Of the 50 wealthiest congressional districts, Democrats represent 41. Democratic politicians and their staff tend to be products of the elite Ivy League universities, while Republicans tend to come from state universities.

The “Left” includes liberals, who believe in addressing economic disparity, and progressives, who focus on identity politics. Savodnik quotes Tyler Harper, a more traditional leftist scholar who supported Bernie Sanders:

“Progressives,” Harper said, are the people who think racial identity reigns supreme and have no serious objection to capitalism. “I don’t think they’re left-wing in any substantive sense at all,” Harper said of progressives. He saw progressivism and “corporatism” as “natural allies.”

As we see in the big corporations that have embraced Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion mandates.

Savodnik doesn’t discuss the “Right” as much, but, as we have been discussing on this blog, there are now a wide range of quite different ideologies–Christian nationalism, libertarianism, protectionist economics, free market economics, cultural conservatives, classical liberals, integralists, and authoritarians–all of which go by the label “conservative.”

As Oklahoma City republican Jason Reese says, “Our language is impoverished, left over from the French Revolution, with us just saying ‘right’ and ‘left’ and what we think we mean by that.”

It isn’t that the Independents are simply moderates between two extremes. Nor that they are apolitical, just not caring about politics or not knowing what they believe. Savodnik interviews a number of people whose views are just too complicated to fit into any party line.

He cites a lesbian truck driver who “can’t stand the kids in the LGBTQ+ movement with their ’20 zillion acronyms.’” She worries about illegal immigration, the economic problems of small town rural America, and the prospect of getting involved in more foreign wars. But she’s pro-abortion and worried about the environment. She voted for Trump, then Biden, and now doesn’t know who to vote for. Reports Savodnik, “She said she isn’t a ‘conservative’ or ‘progressive,’ and definitely not a Democrat or Republican.”

Then there is the school teacher who is pro-life and an environmentalist. Then there is the mom from India:

She had immigrated to the United States from India with her family when she was eight, and she had always leaned Democratic.

It’s not that she doesn’t know what she believes. She is definitely pro-choice, but she also wants to curb “unauthorized immigration.” She thinks the new gender politics is insane, but she believes strongly in defending civil liberties. And she’s giving her four daughters a traditional homeschool education that includes Latin and classical music.

The trouble is that all of these things do not fit together into one party or camp or label.

What can we conclude from this political “scramble”? Perhaps if our government and our political parties had more modest aims–focusing on consensus issues such as curbing illegal immigration and improving the economy while toning down the rhetoric about the more divisive issues–they could cobble together a winning coalition of these independent voters. Any other ideas?

Photo: “Let’s Have Some Complexity” by futureatlas.com via Flickr, CC by 2.0

Previous Post

January 17, 2024

Carl Trueman: Lessons from Lutheranism

Next Post

January 19, 2024 DISCUSSION: On Sports

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"I am told one only gets the $90 if one is on a Supplemental Medicare ..."

reg

On Trump’s Political Ads That You ..."

"I too don't think the $5,000 giveaway will happen, but only because the Trumpublicans won't ..."

Tom Hering

On Trump’s Political Ads That You ..."

"Well, large cash give-aways are generally bad policy, but really bad in any of the ..."

1another

On Trump’s Political Ads That You ..."

"Well, we think it pretty much fits my thesis, except I'm not sure whether all ..."

kerner

On Trump’s Political Ads That You ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who does Paul describe as his true son in the faith?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Onesimus Timothy Titus Philemon

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »