Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
Monday Miscellany, 11/13/23

Monday Miscellany, 11/13/23

Last updated on: November 13, 2023 at 7:35 am by Gene Veith

0 Comments

Monday Miscellany, 11/13/23 2023-11-13T07:35:59-05:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Veterans Day was on Saturday, November 11, but it is being “observed” today. So we salute all those who have served–or are serving still–in the military vocations! (On Friday, we will observe those vocations again.) For today. . .

World population tops 8 billion, but not because of births; why the wealth tax won’t work; and de-banking “so that no one can buy or sell.”

World Population Tops 8 Billion, but Not Because of Births

The population of the world has now passed 8 billion people, according to U.S. Census Bureau calculations. Not because more children are being born, but because people are living so much longer.

Nearly three-quarters of those 8 billion people live in countries with fertility rates below replacement level.

So despite the record number of people on the planet, we are still facing not a population explosion but a population implosion.

Just to put the world’s population in perspective, India has the most people (recently passing China) with 1.428 billion, which comes to 17.76% of the planet’s total. China is second, with 1.425 billion, 17.72% of the total.

Did you realize that the United States of America is the third most populous nation, at 340 million, which comprises just 4.3% of the world’s total?

Numbers 4 and 5 are the two huge Islamic nations of Indonesia, with 277.5 million (3.45%), and Pakistan, with 240.5 million (2.99%).

Rounding out the top 10 are #6 Nigeria with 223.8 million (2.78%), #7 Brazil with 216.4 million (2.69%), #8 Bangladesh with 172.9 million (2.15%), #9 Russia with 144.4 million (1.8%), and #10 Mexico with 128.4 million (1.6%).

For the rest of the list of the world’s nations by population, go here. The smallest, by the way, is “the Holy See”–that is, the Vatican, which somehow has the status of a nation–with 518.

Why the Wealth Tax Won’t Work

A wealth tax is an idea being promoted in progressive circles as a way to “soak the rich.” Instead of just taxing incomes, a wealth tax would calculate the market value of people’s total assets and impose a tax on them year after year.

A number of countries have imposed wealth taxes, though most of those have subsequently dropped them. They have never been tried in the U.S., where they would seem to be unconstitutional, constituting a “direct tax” in violation of Section I, Section 9, clause 4. But some argue that states, if not the national government, would be free to impose them.

So Washington state is considering imposing a wealth tax, which would be projected to bring in $3.2 billion a year. That’s not necessarily the reason, but the state’s richest resident, Amazon’s Jeff Bezos has just moved to low-tax Florida. The third richest man in the world, Bezos is a political progressive, but a wealth tax would cost him $1.44 billion a year. That’s 45% of what the state was planning to collect!

See Dan McLaughlin, Bezos Leaving Washington State for Low-Tax Florida and Dominic Pino, When Your New Tax Depends on One Taxpayer.

In addition to the legal and logistical problems, a wealth tax won’t work because it violates two principles: (1) The maxim that if you want less of something, tax it, and if you want more of something, don’t tax it. If you want more wealth in your state, don’t drive out the wealthy, who can afford to live anywhere they want. (2) Aesop’s moral about killing the golden goose.

De-Banking “So That No One Can Buy or Sell”

I came across an article on a phenomenon I have only recently heard of: de-banking. A bank suddenly and without warning or explanation cancels a customer’s account.

See Why Banks Are Suddenly Closing Down Customer Accounts. The story, originally in the New York Times but available at the link, tells about people trying to use a credit or debit card, only to find it rejected. After a frantic call, they are told, “Per your account agreement, we can close your account for any reason at any time.” The people this happens to aren’t told why and there is nothing they can do about it. Says the article,

This isn’t your standard boot for people who have bounced too many checks. Instead, a vast security apparatus has kicked into gear, starting with regulators in Washington and trickling down to bank security managers and branch staff eyeballing customers. The goal is to crack down on fraud, terrorism, money laundering, human trafficking and other crimes.

In the process, banks are evicting what appear to be an increasing number of individuals, families and small-business owners. Often, they don’t have the faintest idea why their banks turned against them.

What seems to trigger this are large cash deposits or withdrawals, international wires to or from certain countries, or other transactions that algorithms find suspicious.

From the people interviewed in the story, though, some of them were guilty of no wrong doing. A bad credit report will give reasons, which can be appealed and cleared up when there is a mistake. Apparently, banks don’t have to give any information about the reason for their action. (When an account is canceled, do the owners of the account get back the money they had in it? The story doesn’t say. Does anybody know?)

I’m worried about the “other crimes” referenced in the above quote. First, this would seem like a case of punishing a crime without having been found guilty in a court of law. If the bankers see evidence of illegal behavior, shouldn’t they notify the police, rather than presuming to impose a penalty themselves?

Second, I can see how the catch-all of “other crimes” could be expanded in all kinds of troubling ways. Politically incorrect transgressions such as alleged “hate speech” that consists of disapproving of homosexuality is already criminalized in some jurisdictions. But they wouldn’t have to be actual crimes, since losing your bank account is a sanction outside of the legal system. If “we can close your account for any reason at any time,” the woke capitalists at your bank can punish anyone they wish. And if you are unable to access your money or use your credit card, you are, in effect, erased from society.

De-banking seems tailor made for social control and religious persecution. In fact, as we blogged about, missionary Andrew Brunson, who spent two years in a Turkish prison, said that he had been de-banked, as was former Kansas governor Sam Brownback, now involved in an international religious freedom initiative. Perhaps this was because of international transactions with Muslim groups that a algorithm deemed suspicious rather than anti-religious persecution.

You don’t have to be a millennialist to be reminded of the Second Beast (the false prophet?) who requires both the rich and the poor to be marked, “so that no one can buy or sell unless he has the mark, that is, the name of the beast or the number of its name” (Revelation 13:17). I had always assumed that this is symbolic, but now preventing people from buying and selling is technologically possible.

Previous Post

November 10, 2023

Breaking Through the "Front Lines of Human Thought"

Next Post

November 14, 2023 Another Red State Chooses Abortion

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Yes, the discussion seems to be about the cultural side-effects of religion instead of religion ..."

David N. Gray

A Catholic Century or an Evangelical ..."

"I take it as a given that he means faith in “Jesus” or at least, ..."

1another

A Catholic Century or an Evangelical ..."

"Unfortunately she is also defending Russell Brand, so perhaps she also remains a total wacko."

reg

Monday Miscellany, 11/9/26

"Never touches on "vibrant faith" in what. "Personally vibrant faith" without an in what means ..."

reg

A Catholic Century or an Evangelical ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month November 2026 October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the mother of John Mark, whose house was a place of prayer in Jerusalem?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Lydia Tabitha Mary Priscilla

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »