Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
Meritocracy? What Meritocracy?

Meritocracy? What Meritocracy?

Last updated on: August 10, 2023 at 6:00 am by Gene Veith

0 Comments

Meritocracy? What Meritocracy? 2023-08-05T17:40:33-04:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Yesterday we posted about David Brook’s New York Times column entitled What If We’re the Bad Guys Here? in which he took to task his fellow Ivy League-educated professionals who have formed a new ruling class in America.

I said that I appreciated his self-knowledge and his Lutheran way of using the moral law not to justify himself and his social class but to expose their sins. I would like to go further, though, in taking a Lutheran religious concept and applying it to a secular issue by challenging the concept of “merit,” as in the term Brooks repeats numerous times, “meritocracy.”

For example, “The most important of those systems is the modern meritocracy. We built an entire social order that sorts and excludes people on the basis of the quality that we possess most: academic achievement.” Brooks observes, “The meritocracy isn’t only a system of exclusion; it’s an ethos.” He quotes Daniel Markovits, author of a book entitled The Meritocracy Trap: “Meritocracy blocks the middle class from opportunity. Then it blames those who lose a competition for income and status that, even when everyone plays by the rules, only the rich can win.”

Though Brooks criticizes it, he seems to share the assumption that what we have in our current ruling class is, in fact, a “meritocracy.” I question that.

To be sure, he says that the modern meritocracy is a social order that sorts people according to only one measure of merit: academic achievement. This merit is earned primarily not just by graduating from college but by graduating from an elite college. About which he gives this fascinating statistic: “Only 0.8 percent of all college students graduate from the super elite 12 schools (the Ivy League colleges, plus Stanford, M.I.T., Duke and the University of Chicago).” And yet this less-than-1% dominate the professions of law, education, government, the arts, business, and journalism, among others.

While a college degree is a ticket to the middle class, an elite college degree is a ticket to the upper class. And I can understand how graduates of the super-elite and even the next tier Brooks mentions of the “the 29 most elite universities in the nation” would think that they are very smart, possessing an elite level of knowledge and understanding that puts them far above ordinary Americans. Because of their high “merit,” they deserve the privileges that come to them. As for all of those Trump supporters, religious fundamentalists, and other deplorables, they are just ignorant and uneducated.

First of all, getting into the elite 29 and especially into the super-elite 12 universities is not necessarily based on merit. As we blogged about, nearly a third of Harvard’s students are so-called ALDC students, the acronym referring to Athletes, Legacies (the children of alumni), Donors (children of parents who give money), and Children (of faculty and staff).

Only 5% of the vast number of applicants trying to get into Harvard are ALDC. But they make up 30% of the students who are admitted. The effect of these “legacy” admissions is to create a self-perpetuating elite, comprised of wealthy families who have leveraged their high-status education to create a hereditary aristocracy. Thus, Harvard, like 37 other colleges, has more students from the top 1% of family incomes than from the bottom 60%.

As for the other two-thirds of the students, selective schools can put together very talented classes. And studying with other high-ability students can bring out a student’s best efforts. But academic merit is hard to assess, a task made even harder by the current practice in many of these schools to do away with objective measures, such as test scores and tough grading.

Furthermore, it is a truism in higher education, where I have spent a long career, that the education you receive from a prestige institution is not that much different than what you would receive from a good state university or a private liberal arts school. They all use pretty much the same textbooks and the same assignments. Ivy League professors are not necessarily better classroom teachers than those in a less prestigious institution. In fact, they may be worse, since faculty in elite institutions tend to be chosen and rewarded for their research contributions, whereas “teaching institutions” put a higher premium on classroom effectiveness. By and large, with some exceptions in some disciplines, graduates from regular universities learn just as much as graduates from the elite universities. What the latter do give you, though, is prestige, a higher social status that you can leverage with employers–in academia, law firms, the corporate world, etc.–who, in turn, want the prestige that Ivy Leaguers can give them.

To be sure, there are meritocracies in American life. And there are many kinds of merit, with academic merit being perhaps one of the least important. Sports is perhaps the truest form of meritocracy. Many businesses still make it possible for employees to work their way up in the organization based on sheer effectiveness, rather than social privilege. The military has long been a model of meritocracy, giving service members plenty of opportunity to rise in the ranks, being judged not by their background but how well they perform. Many members of minority groups have taken full advantage of that kind of meritocracy by having brilliant military careers at times when other professions would exclude them.

Today, though, the educational “meritocracy” Brooks complains of permeates big business, with Ivy grads bringing with them the postmodernism and the identity politics that they learned at school. The same social class and its mindset can also be found in the Pentagon.

The biggest evidence that our ruling class is not a meritocracy can be seen in the state of the professions that they have been controlling. Brooks cites his own field of journalism, once a blue-collar profession, which is now dominated not only by college graduates but by elite college graduates, with over half the staff writers at the New York Times and Wall Street Journal having attended an elite university.

So we can ask, how is the journalism profession now that it’s a “meritocracy”? Both newspapers and online news organizations are shutting down, newsrooms are shrinking, and the public’s trust in journalism has dropped off the edge.

How is the legal system doing with all of the graduates of Ivy League law schools?

How effective is our government, manned as it is with so many elite experts?

How is academia doing, the gatekeepers for who will belong to our new ruling class? What’s the effect of critical theory, postmodern relativism, and identity politics when they move outside the walls of academe?

In our recent blog post Americans Distrust Nearly All of Their Institutions, we list a study of American’s confidence in various institutions. Here are the bottom five, with the percentage of Americans expressing confidence as of 2023):

Newspapers (18%)

The criminal justice system (17%)

Television news (14%)

Big business (14%)

Congress (8%)

All bastions of our meritocracy!

Photo by Jack Moreh from Freerange Stock

Previous Post

August 9, 2023

Elite Self-Knowledge

Next Post

August 11, 2023 DISCUSSION: Is Trump the Moderate?

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"I know wired earbuds are making a comeback (I never stopped using them as I ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

"VCRs, tape decks, and cassette players are all having a revival among a segment of ..."

Tom Hering

Luther on Tools

"As a (retired) lawyer I see potential liability from sharing things like power or sharp ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

"I am not sure the items you mentioned, though disused, discontinued, discarded, could be considered ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What animals attacked and killed Job's servants, according to the messengers?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Sabeans and Chaldeans Philistines and Moabites Ammonites and Edomites Syrians and Egyptians

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »