Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
Truth in Labeling

Truth in Labeling

Last updated on: March 21, 2023 at 6:00 am by Gene Veith

0 Comments

Truth in Labeling 2023-03-16T15:10:06-04:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Eleanor Bartow has published an insightful article at The Federalist entitled They Are Intolerant, Divisive, And Anti-Liberty — Call Them Leftists, Not Liberals. “Democrats have moved so far to the left in recent years that they should no longer be called ‘liberals,'” she writes. “The term is misleading, giving the impression that Democrats support individual freedoms and accept people of different viewpoints, when increasingly they do not.”

As I have often said, in referring to my defense of the “liberal” arts, the word has the same Latin root as “liberty,” referring to freedom. Even today, “liberal economics” refers to a belief in free markets, not, as one might expect from self-described “liberal politicians,” a government-controlled economy funding social programs for all.

We also have “liberal democracy,” meaning a political order built around individual freedom and constitutional rights, in which the government is answerable to the people, rather than vice versa. Bartow explains:

Liberalism “emphasizes individual autonomy, equality of opportunity, and the protection of individual rights (primarily to life, liberty, and property),” the Encyclopedia Britannica explains. The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines liberals as “standing for the protection of political and civil liberties” and “not bound by authoritarianism.”

But now the party that used to be associated with this kind of liberalism has become increasingly illiberal, calling for a stronger and more authoritarian government, favoring racial, sexual, and gender groupings over individuals, and seeking to stifle free speech and other civil liberties. There is a word for that:

In contrast, a “leftist” is “usually characterized by desire to reform or overthrow the established order,” according to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary. This is an apt description of the divisive “critical race theory” and “diversity, equity, and inclusion” that teaches a misreading of our nation’s founding and society and is infiltrating schools, universities, and the workplace.

This definition also describes those who are breaking down our society with a transgender ideology that erases the boundaries of male versus female, requiring females to compete with biological men who identify as women and to share bathrooms and locker rooms with them. . . .

Another definition of leftists, from the Cambridge Dictionary, says they believe “wealth and power should be shared between all parts of society” and “governments should provide a higher level of social services and support laws to bring about greater economic and social equality.”

Indeed, leftist regimes–such as the Soviet Union, China, Cuba, and North Korea–dispense completely with any pretense of democracy, implement a government that seeks to control the totality of life in the country, impose a rigorous collectivism that has no place for individualism, and eliminates the very concept of human rights.

I have to say that labels describing “conservatives” have similar limitations. There is an illiberal “right” as well as an illiberal “left.” Catholic integralists, for example, blame the historic American emphasis on “liberty” for sexual immorality, the breakdown of the family, feminism, abortion, and our other cultural problems. They are ready to dispense with the concept, along with “rights” and “democracy,” in favor of a Catholic state on the model of the medieval papacy and the Holy Roman Empire. Never mind the Protestant notion, favored by our founders, of “ordered liberty,” which sees moral breakdowns as hindrances to genuine freedom, since giving in to our passions is a form of enslavement.

And there are less extreme forms of illiberalism on the right. The spatial metaphor of “right” and “left” originally referred to where legislators sat in the French parliament, with the pro-monarchy faction seated on the right side of the room and the pro-democracy faction seated on the left. That brings up another problem with “rightists”: in the European tradition, they were the ones who wanted a strong, authoritarian government that controlled the economy. Like leftists do today! And now some American conservatives are discovering the European “conservative tradition” and are formulating their own anti-democratic, anti-freedom policies accordingly.

“Conservative” also has problems. The term hinges on, but does not define, what one wants to conserve. Very few on the Republican side of things wants to conserve what is the status quo today. And everyone in every faction seems to decry the “establishment.” I remember times in the Nixon administration, when Republicans would defend the “establishment.” But we are all hippies now.

Perhaps the term of choice among Democrats is neither “liberal” nor “leftist” but “progressive.” That implies a belief in progress, that things are getting better and better, as we leave behind what is old and traditional. That can work up to a point, but today’s progressives keep insisting on how bad things are today, how black Americans are still oppressed as if emancipation and the Civil Rights movement never happened, and how women and sexual minorities are still shackled.

I suppose the opposite of “progressive” would be “traditionalist,” a term that I have heard some conservatives use for themselves, referring to the idea that there are elements from the past that deserve to be continued and passed down. Again, though, few Americans would defend all traditions or consider that tradition alone makes something valuable.

Some Republicans are embracing “populism,” referring to the will of the people. But in the 1930s “populism” was the ideology of the left, or of progressives, or liberals, or whatever you want to call them. Again, the specific meaning of “populism” depends on what the people want: making America great again, or empowering unions? pushing back against wokeism in schools and companies, or implementing new social programs? There are, though, common themes in the various kinds of populism: namely, a distrust of elites and big corporations and protectionist made-in-America economics, which perhaps could be the basis of a coalition.

“Libertarianism” conveys the emphasis on liberty and individual rights, but it has connotations of libertinism–disordered liberty, of the sort that favors abortion, sexual immorality, and legalizing every vice, as well as Ayn Rand’s atheistic “virtue of selfishness.”

In the realm of theology “conservative” believers are variously called “fundamentalists” (a term most of them dislike), “evangelicals” (a term that can be misleading and has fallen out of favor), “orthodox” (a term, however, which also refers to a distinct theological tradition). We Lutherans have started to use “confessional,” meaning holding to our theological confessions, and that term is also used by “confessional Calvinists.” But not all church traditions have formal confessions of faith, though they likely have beliefs that do characterize them. Can we say “confessional Baptists”? “Confessional Pentecostalists”? And what do we call conservative Catholics? “Confessional Catholics”? Normally, one might define those folks as those adhering to the papacy, but today the most conservative Catholics are those who oppose their liberal/leftist/progressive pope.

Any ideas about what “conservatives” (you know what I mean) should call themselves?

Illustration: The Political Spectrum via Wikideas1, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons.

Previous Post

March 20, 2023

Monday Miscellany 3/20/23

Next Post

March 22, 2023 Americans vs. Both Political Parties

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"VCRs, tape decks, and cassette players are all having a revival among a segment of ..."

Tom Hering

Luther on Tools

"As a (retired) lawyer I see potential liability from sharing things like power or sharp ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

"I am not sure the items you mentioned, though disused, discontinued, discarded, could be considered ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

"“Friend, use me in your relations with your neighbor just as you would want your ..."

DakotaLutheran

Luther on Tools

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said: "You are a chosen people, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, God's special possession"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Moses Peter James Paul

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »