Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
The Problems of Each Political Party

The Problems of Each Political Party

Last updated on: February 8, 2023 at 6:00 am by Gene Veith

0 Comments

The Problems of Each Political Party 2023-02-04T18:31:07-05:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Peggy Noonan has written a provocative article outlining the problems of both of our political parties.

Her Wall Street Journal column (behind a paywall) is entitled Our Political Parties Are Struggling, with the deck “The Democrats need normality; the Republicans need coherence. They both need to pull themselves out of the 20th century.”

She says that now that the overturning of Roe v. Wade has sent the abortion issue back to the states, Democrats, who have long branded themselves as the pro-abortion without limits party, have an opportunity. They have uncritically championed abortion, but at the expense of their moral authority. Therefore, many Americans, she says, cannot bring themselves to vote Democratic.

Now, in a national sense, the great agitating question is being taken off the board. The Democrats are free to be a normal party again, standing for things that are the normal concerns of parties (economics, war and peace). More voters would feel free to join.

Instead of seeing this they’ve replaced one stigma with another. Since at least 2020 they have aligned with or allowed themselves to be associated with another deeply agitating cultural question, the identity politics-wokeness regime. (It’s amazing we still don’t have an agreed upon word or phrase that fully captures this program.) Michael Lind, in a piece in the Tablet, sees it as composed of three parts, all falsely presented. The “Quota Project” uses anti-racism to pursue “social reconstruction.” The “Androgyny Project” goes beyond civil rights and ignores gay rights to “redefine all male and female human beings as generic, androgynous humanoids whose sex is a matter of subjective self-definition.” The “Green Project” uses climate change as an excuse to “radically restructure the society of the U.S. and other advanced industrial democracies.”

She says that this emphasis is a formula for losing? And yet Democrats are in thrall to this particular leftist ideology.

Why don’t they push back, hard—as a party? Most of their elected officials aren’t really on board with this stuff; many hate it. They know it limits their political prospects. America as it is currently constituted will never accept the regime, never be at peace with it, because Americans see it as a threat to their children and an insult to their sense of reality and fairness.

But Republicans are also shooting themselves in the foot.

The Republicans—where to start? They’re riven by policy disagreements, some of which stem from philosophical disagreements regarding what conservatism is and must be in the 21st century.

They haven’t decided if they’re a “limited government” party or a party that accepts, as it should, that the federal government will never be small in our lifetimes, and being mature means seeing that and turning the party’s focus toward the pursuit of more conservative ends, such as . . . helping families? Police the government, don’t spend like nuts, aim for growth, encourage dynamism, think long term.

Moreover, their bickering and failure to come up with coherent policies make it appear that the Republicans are incapable of governing. Also, they are taking positions that Americans as a whole just will not go along with.

Noonan cites the dysfunctions evident in the fight for Speaker of the House. But let me offer some other examples.

To get his Speakership, Kevin McCarthy agreed to bring to the floor certain proposals put forward by recalcitrant members of his party. One of them is to abolish the income tax, replacing it with a 23%-30% national sales tax.

Who thinks the American public would get on board with that? It has been said that if we were design the tax system from scratch, a consumption tax might be better than an income tax, but right now, hardly anyone would want such a radical change. The proposal will go nowhere, since this is a hobby horse of at most a handful of Congressmen. But this allows their Democratic opponents to say, “In this time of inflation, Republicans are wanting to raise the price of everything by 30%!”

Here is another example of conservatives cheerfully committing political suicide. In the opinion pages of The Wall Street Journal, Andrew G. Biggs, a fellow of the conservative American Enterprise Institute, offers an idea that would make Social Security more solvent: “If every senior simply received a benefit equal to the 2022 poverty threshold—just over $14,000 for a single retiree and about $17,600 for couples—Social Security’s $1.3 trillion annual cost for 2023 would be nearly cut in half.”

Well, yes. But imagine what the Democrats will say: “They want all retirees to be at the poverty line!”

Biggs adds, “Would capping the maximum benefit be enough to fix Social Security? Not even close.” So after recommending a tumultuous change that would have senior citizens, an important voting bloc that leans Republican, rioting like Antifa in the streets, he admits that this wouldn’t come close to solving the problem!

Yes, the problem needs to be solved. And, yes, Biggs is a conservative intellectual, not an elected official. And, yes, Speaker McCarthy has made it clear that cutting Social Security and Medicare is off the table in the debt ceiling debate. But such politically tone-deaf proposals, ones that might sound good in theory but would be politically impossible to implement, suggests a party that doesn’t know what it is doing.

One more example. Donald Trump feels threatened by Ron DeSantis, who has emerged as a possible rival in the upcoming Republican presidential primary. So, as is his wont, he goes into full attack mode. He has said that despite the Florida governor’s reputation for resisting much of the COVID overreach, he actually shut down Florida and “closed the beaches.”

But. . .but. . .Trump was the one who closed down the whole country in the first place! It was his administration that shut down American businesses, that hired Dr. Fauci as the leader of the anti-COVID effort, that mandated masks, rushed the vaccines into production, etc., etc.

Now those who support such policies, given what we knew then, should give Trump credit, although they almost never do. Conversely, one would think that COVID skeptics could hardly support Trump, though many of them do.

But for the president who ordered the shutdowns to attack an anti-lockdown governor for shutting down his state as the president ordered is just bizarre.

Do neither of the political parties want to win an election?

What do you think the prospects are?

Photo: Peggy Noonan by Gage Skidmore from Peoria, AZ, United States of America, CC BY-SA 2.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0>, via Wikimedia Commons

Previous Post

February 7, 2023

The State of the Union According to Americans

Next Post

February 9, 2023 The High Tech Pronatalists

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Apropos to the post on Gen Z a couple days ago: "If you want the ..."

Steve Bauer

Luther on Tools

"“Don't eat with your hands, son, use your entrenching tool.”"

reg

Luther on Tools

"You serious, Clark?"

reg

Luther on Tools

"And all tools are made of media, thus making language and literature a tool (see, ..."

Steve Bauer

Luther on Tools

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "You shall have no other gods before me"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

God Joshua Moses Aaron

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »