Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
Publishing My Critique of Constructivism

Publishing My Critique of Constructivism

Last updated on: January 30, 2023 at 6:00 am by Gene Veith

0 Comments

Publishing My Critique of Constructivism 2023-01-28T13:03:42-05:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Last week I spoke at Faith Classical Lutheran School in Plano, Texas, on my books Postmodern Times and Post-Christian. Their high school students study Postmodern Times (which amazed me!), and I thought I would talk about how I updated that book in the sequel.

The school publicist sent out a press release, whereupon an editor of the Dallas Morning News contacted her back, saying that he was interested in the topic and inviting me to write an op-ed piece for the paper. I was glad to, but I was warned that the paper has a very liberal and progressive bias.

So I set myself a task in experimental writing. How could I write up my ideas in such a way that they might get through to readers that would be inclined to oppose them? Specifically, the readers at issue would be the editorial page editors of a major newspaper. And I would be able to assess whether or not I succeeded. If I didn’t, they wouldn’t publish the column.

So I put something together. I wanted to target the notion of “constructivism,” the notion that we construct our own realities. This idea pervades the postmodernism I wrote about in 1994 and has been taken to new extremes in contemporary thought today, as I write about in my recent book. So I led with some quotations about the “Metaverse,” which is an attempt to literally create our own reality by means of technology. From that, I went to other more contentious examples of constructivism in politics and morality.

To my surprise, I heard back from the editor that they really liked the piece! They published it at the top of the fold (the most prominent position) on the op-ed page, illustrating it with a great photograph!

The headline made it sound like the piece was primarily about the Metaverse, but I think my larger point comes through.

The article is behind a paywall, but as the author I have the right to post it behind a paywall of my own. Here is my original unedited version:

Our Need for Reality-Based Thinking

By Gene Edward Veith

In the metaverse, we will don virtual reality helmets and, from the comfort of our homes, go to school, work, shop, and socialize in a shared computer-generated animation. We will appear as avatars, which we can design to look any way we like, and in this virtual universe we will interact with other people’s avatars.

One of the masterminds of the metaverse, Mark Zuckerberg, the founder of FaceBook who changed the name of his company to Meta, in line with his new technological priority, told a podcaster about his ambitions (my emphasis): “A lot of people think that the metaverse is about a place, but one definition of this is it’s about a time when basically immersive digital worlds become the primary way that we live our lives and spend our time.”

This is to say, he hopes to replace reality with virtual reality. Another internet mogul, Marc Andreesen, a member of the Meta board, is explicit about this. “Reality has had 5,000 years to get good, and is clearly still woefully lacking for most people,” he said. “We should build — and we are building — online worlds that make life and work and love wonderful for everyone, no matter what level of reality deprivation they find themselves in.”

The notion that “you create your own reality” is associated with pop psychologists. Now constructing one’s own reality seems technologically feasible. In fact, the belief that we can have “alternative realities” has a long pedigree.

The 20th century was the age of “modernism,” marked by the triumph of science and a trust in progress. Along with that came the sense that the scientific method is the only way to determine what is true. But scientific truths are nothing more than brute facts, devoid of any particular significance. Therefore, questions of meaning, values, ethics, religion, and culture—areas that occupy us more than scientific facts–must be purely subjective.

These began to be seen as “constructions.” Existentialist philosophers said that in a meaningless world, we must create our own meanings by an act not of the intellect but of the will. Political theorists went further, saying that meaning is created not just by the will but by the will to power. Not just by individuals but by social groups that create beliefs and institutions to impose their power on other groups. Claims of truth are really masks for racial, sexual, gender, and other kinds of oppression. Such “constructivism” became the hallmark of “postmodernism,” which has moved from academia into the whole culture and can be found on all sides.

Now we are seeing the consequences. Of course we are polarized politically. If culture is no more than groups trying to exercise power over each other, how could it be otherwise?
If we all inhabit different realities, no wonder we feel isolated from each other. If we do not recognize our common humanity, of course we will mistreat each other.

In the absence of objective, rational truth, we cannot reason with each other. Disagreements are interpreted as attempts to “impose your truth” on me. Since your beliefs stem from your will rather than your intellect, persuasion is impossible. You are my enemy, whom I must silence and punish.

And in a climate that considers explanations to be nothing more than constructed “narratives” and “explanatory paradigms,” conspiracy theories flourish.

In contrast, classical thought stresses a common, objective reality that is knowable by reason. And that people, for all of their differences, share a common humanity. Christianity goes further, teaching that human beings have a transcendent value in the love of God, who is the source of both a good creation and a moral law that even people in power are subject to. These strains would come together in liberal democracy, with its ideals of liberty, equality, and individual rights.

These cannot be sustained by postmodernist constructivism. Today, we can still draw on our moral heritage to decry oppression. But postmodern critical theory teaches that oppression is an intrinsic part of all societies. Ultimately, if your group oppresses me, all I can do is seize power so that I can impose my reality and oppress you.

To be sure, liberal democracies have much to answer for. But surely slavery, racism, the destruction of indigenous people, and other crimes grow out of a failure to recognize our common humanity and a failure to apply transcendent moral truths.

Despite our self-constructed realities, objective reality has a way of breaking in. COVID, wars, economic woes, and natural catastrophes are not just mental constructions. But we are ill-equipped to “get our minds around them.” Actual reality is multi-faceted and complex, as opposed to the cartoon-like metaverse and the simplistic reductionism of so much contemporary thought. We need a return to reality-based thinking.

Gene Edward Veith is a retired English professor and the author of numerous books on Christianity and culture, including Postmodern Times and Post-Christian.

Illustration: The Metaverse Festival by Duncan Rawlinson via Flickr, CC 2.0

Classical Lutheran Education

Previous Post

January 27, 2023

Losing Your Religion & Suicide

Next Post

January 31, 2023 And now the "Transabled"

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"I know wired earbuds are making a comeback (I never stopped using them as I ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

"VCRs, tape decks, and cassette players are all having a revival among a segment of ..."

Tom Hering

Luther on Tools

"As a (retired) lawyer I see potential liability from sharing things like power or sharp ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

"I am not sure the items you mentioned, though disused, discontinued, discarded, could be considered ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Daniel interpreted King Nebuchadnezzar's dream about a statue made of different metals.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »