Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
Resolution and Resistance in Teaching Reading

Resolution and Resistance in Teaching Reading

Last updated on: September 1, 2022 at 6:00 am by Gene Veith

0 Comments

Resolution and Resistance in Teaching Reading 2022-08-28T18:03:59-04:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Being able to read well is the prerequisite for learning everything else. So teaching kids how to read is the most important task of primary education. But how to do that has been controversial. Now, though, research has settled the issue about the best way of teaching children how to read. But some teachers and school districts are refusing to follow the science.

Time Magazine, no less (not a conservative publication) has published an eye-opening article on the subject by Belinda Luscombe entitled Inside the Massive Effort to Change the Way Kids Are Taught to Read.

Traditionally, reading has been taught by phonics. That is, attention to the sounds the letters symbolize, which in turn are put together to form words. But since the 1980s, a different approach emerged and came to dominate elementary school reading curricula and classrooms. The whole language approach teaches children to recognize entire words visually, by what they look like. Students are also encouraged to identify words by their contexts, to “construct meaning,” and to immerse themselves in reading material relevant to them. The assumption is that learning to read can happen “naturally,” like learning to speak. (See this for a fuller account of the approach.)

Unfortunately, since the whole language approach has been introduced, reading proficiency rates have plummeted. In 2019, only 35% of fourth-graders were proficient in reading. Only 21% of low-income children, 18% of black children, and 23% of Hispanic children were proficient.

Yes, some children can learn to read with the whole language method, but the mental gymnastics it requires are beyond the comprehension of many other children. Good students can figure out how to read no matter what method is used to teach them, but others are at a loss when they are expected to “drop everything and read” when they don’t know how to read and the ability to do so is not coming “naturally.”

As university teacher training programs and curriculum publishers went all in for whole language, classical schools, homeschoolers, and traditionalist teachers stuck with phonics.

In 2000, the National Reading Panel, consisting of a large group of literacy experts, met to settle the issue of what method of teaching reading works best. Reviewing hundreds of studies, they issued a report that concluded that what students need in order to learn how to read well is phonics. That is to say, “phonemic awareness” (attention to sounds), “instruction in phonics,” the development of fluency, vocabulary instruction (learning new words), teaching the comprehension of texts, and preparing teachers to do all of these things.

Such a finding should be obvious. Our writing system is alphabetic, breaking down words into their constituent sounds that are symbolized by letters. School-aged children mostly know how to speak. If they learn 26 letters and 44 sound combinations, plus some exceptions to the rules, they can read. If they must learn the appearance of words, they will have to memorize thousands of shapes for basic literacy, and they will have no strategy to decode any new words they encounter. Mass literacy arose in the West because the alphabet made reading easy, whereas in, for example, China, whose writing system is based on ideograms–a complicated visual representation of each word–literacy until recently was restricted to a small elite. It is just harder to learn to read in the Chinese writing system. Whole language exchanges our alphabetic system for an ideographic system, with predictable results.

The National Reading Panel report is entitled Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction. This has led to further work confirming the superiority of phonics known as “the science of reading.” Since the report, some states have called for the implementation of “evidence-based” or “research-based” curriculum. All of those are references to the use of phonics to teach reading.

The Wikipedia article on Whole Language gives an excellent summary not only of the approach but also why the science has demonstrated conclusively that it does not work. For example, “Unlike language, literacy is not a human universal but a human invention (much as children learn to walk without being taught, but not how to drive a car or fly a helicopter).”

The new science of reading has led to a revival of phonics in many schools. Where “evidence-based” approaches have been adopted, reading scores have shot up. Nevertheless, opposition to teaching phonics has arisen from teachers, not because they disagree with the research but because they want to teach something else.

In the Time article, Luscombe reports on what happened in Oakland, California:

As a teacher in Oakland, Calif., Kareem Weaver helped struggling fourth- and fifth-grade kids learn to read by using a very structured, phonics-based reading curriculum called Open Court. It worked for the students, but not so much for the teachers. “For seven years in a row, Oakland was the fastest-gaining urban district in California for reading,” recalls Weaver. “And we hated it.”

The teachers felt like curriculum robots—and pushed back. “This seems dehumanizing, this is colonizing, this is the man telling us what to do,” says Weaver, describing their response to the approach. “So we fought tooth and nail as a teacher group to throw that out.”. . .“Those who wanted to fight for social justice, they figured that this new progressive way of teaching reading [whole language] was the way,” he says.”

After reading rates plunged with the “new progressive way of teaching, Weaver is working to bring phonics back:

Now Weaver is heading up a campaign to get his old school district to reinstate many of the methods that teachers resisted so strongly: specifically, systematic and consistent instruction in phonemic awareness and phonics. . . .

Ironically, though teachers invoked “social justice” to oppose phonics, the NAACP and other civil rights leaders are getting behind Weaver’s attempt to bring it back. This is because improving the lot of black children requires that they be taught how to read. It is not “social justice” when only 19% of black children can read. As Weaver said, “We abandoned what worked because we didn’t like how it felt to us as adults, when actually, the social-justice thing to do is to teach them explicitly how to read.”

Another catalyst for returning to phonics, according to Luscombe, has been the parents of dyslexic children, who simply cannot learn with whole language but definitely can with phonics. Their lobbying has caused state legislatures to call for “evidence-based” reading instruction. Some 30 states have enacted laws or new policies to that effect, and 18 have passed laws requiring that teacher preparation programs make sure teachers known how to teach phonics. Recently, New York City mayor Eric Adams has announced that schools in his city–the biggest school district in the country–would be required to use phonics.

This is case in which reality has broken in upon progressive educators, but many teachers are still pushing back against it in the name of their ideology. And, to be fair, because they were never taught to teach phonics and whole language is all they know how to do. The blame here goes to university Departments of Education. But things might be changing. Still, what Luscombe said about Oakland’s phonics program is telling: “It worked for the students, but not so much for the teachers.” She gives Kareem Weaver, the teacher who is working to bring back phonics, the last word:

“The lament is that when we started using new materials, the kids weren’t learning how to read, and to explain that, rather than looking at our materials and what we were doing, we focused on the kids and said, ‘Something’s wrong with them. Something’s wrong with our community. They’re too traumatized or too broken. Their families aren’t good enough. They’re poor.’ We explained the lack of learning in those terms, as opposed to saying, ‘Wait a second, what are we doing? And what did we do when things were working?’”

Photo via pxhere, CC0, Public Domain

teacher education programs

teaching reading

whole language

Previous Post

August 31, 2022

Eliminating the Constitution

Next Post

September 2, 2022 DISCUSS: How Was Your Education?

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"I know wired earbuds are making a comeback (I never stopped using them as I ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

"VCRs, tape decks, and cassette players are all having a revival among a segment of ..."

Tom Hering

Luther on Tools

"As a (retired) lawyer I see potential liability from sharing things like power or sharp ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

"I am not sure the items you mentioned, though disused, discontinued, discarded, could be considered ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which Christian group primarily uses icons in worship?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Quaker Baptist Anglican Eastern Orthodox

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »