Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
Polarization within Polarizations

Polarization within Polarizations

Last updated on: November 16, 2021 at 6:00 am by Gene Veith

0 Comments

Polarization within Polarizations 2021-11-13T18:30:17-05:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Americans, we keep hearing, are polarized. But it’s worse than that. There is polarization in some of the very groups we are polarized into.

Southern Baptists are conservative theologically, but they are polarized over social justice issues. Feminists are polarized over transgenderism, with “allies” of that movement bitterly contending with Transgender Exclusionary Radical Feminists (TERFS), who deny that men can assume the identity of women.

Of course, feuding is nothing new within interest groups, congregations, and families. Today, much of this is driven by our political polarization.

Democrats and Republicans seem to be completely alienated from each other. But we are also polarized within our political parties. That is to say, members of each party are increasingly alienated with each other.

Pro-Trump Republicans are fighting with “establishment” Republicans who want to move forward without the former president. Meanwhile, “Progressive” Democrats are fighting with “Moderate” Democrats, to the point of paralyzing President Biden’s agenda.

Gerald F. Seib writes in the Wall Street Journal that we actually have, in the words of his title, “Four Parties, Zero Trust“:

The Democratic Party today really is two parties: the progressive version of the party, personified by Sen. Bernie Sanders, and the moderate version, personified by Sen. Joe Manchin. This split is hardly new, but now the two sides are roughly equal in congressional strength and leverage. Rather than bringing the two sides together, this balance of power has laid bare their differing agendas and priorities and driven them apart, and Mr. Biden has failed to bridge the gap.

This split is mirrored on the other side of the aisle, where the Republican Party also effectively is split in two. There remains the traditionally conservative GOP, which many Republicans refer to as the “governing part of the party,” because it is interested in advancing its agenda through conventional governing channels. Its power now is at least offset, and probably eclipsed, by the populist, nationalist version of the Republican Party, which is animated more by cultural fights with the left than by traditional conservative policy goals. This part of the party often seems more interested in blowing up the system than working within it. . . .

The divides are made harder to bridge because there not only is mistrust between the two parties, but now an almost equal measure of mistrust between the two factions within each party.

But do our political factions constitute four parties or nine?

The Pew Research Center has conducted a study that identifies nine different political categories that Americans fall into. The report is entitled Beyond Red vs. Blue: The Political Typology, with the deck, “Even in a polarized era, deep divisions in both partisan coalitions.” According to that study, there are four factions on both the Left and the Right, along with one faction that just doesn’t care about politics. Here they are:

On the Left:

(1) Progressive Left. They have extremely liberal views on every issue and seek sweeping, radical changes in society in order to expand the social safety net and to combat racial injustice. Ironically, given that concern, this is the only Democratic faction that is mostly White. They number 6% of the population.

(2) Establishment Liberals. They are often just as liberal as the Progressive Left, but they do not believe America needs sweeping, radical change. They number 13% of the population.

(3) Democratic Mainstays. The biggest and the oldest faction of Democrats, they are party loyalists, but they are moderate on some issues. They constitute 16% of the population.

(4) Outsider Left. The youngest group, they are mostly very liberal, but they distrust the political system, including the Democratic Party and its politicians. They number 10%.

On the Right:

(5) Faith and Flag Conservatives. Pew describes them as “intensely conservative in all realms; they are far more likely than all other typology groups to say government policies should support religious values and that compromise in politics is just ‘selling out on what you believe in.’” They constitute 10% of the population.

(6) Committed Conservatives. They are also conservative on just about everything, but they have “a somewhat softer edge,” especially when it comes to immigration and American exceptionalism. They number 7%.

(7) Populist Right. These Americans “have less formal education than most other typology groups and are among the most likely to live in rural areas, are highly critical of both immigrants and major U.S. corporations.” They number 11%.

(8) Ambivalent Right. The youngest and least conservative group among Republicans. They hold conservative views about limited government, the economy, race, and gender. But they favor legal abortion, support the legalization of marijuana, and want Trump to go away. They number 12%.

Non-aligned

(9) Stressed Sideliners. This group has a mixture of liberal and conservative beliefs, but little political engagement. They just aren’t interested in political issues and hardly ever so much as vote. They comprise 15% of the public.

I find this interesting, but also puzzling. For example, which of these factions support big corporations? Someone obviously does. And where would you put Libertarians? And I’m not sure that the 41% of Americans who are Independents are adequately accounted for here. My sense is that the typology is shaped by the questions asked, and that asking other questions might result in different groupings.

But it’s certainly true that there are many possible political positions–more than these, actually–and yet we try to make them all fit on the Procrustean Bed of a two-party system.

In contrast, parliamentary systems, such as most of the world’s democracies, have multiple parties, each with its own distinct ideology. (Australia has ten national parliamentary parties, plus 32 non-parliamentary parties that seek representation and agitate for their views. These include the Australian Christian party, the No 5G Party, the Shooters, Fishers, and Farmers Party, and the Love Australia or Leave party. In addition, each state has a plethora of parties of its own.)

Parliamentary systems, however, work by forming coalitions of the different parties. Whichever faction can assemble a majority of representatives of the different parties can choose a Prime Minister and assemble a government, whose ministries are usually led by members of the various factions in the coalition. This system thus encourages both diversity of opinion and compromise. At least that’s the theory. Whereas our two-party system encourages polarization and inter-party infighting. And yet, historically things have gotten done just the same.

Later: The possibility of overcoming at least some of our current polarization in politics, through new coalitions and unifying issues.

Image by Gerd Altman via Pixabay

America's polarization

political ideologies

two-party system

types of conservatives

types of liberals

Previous Post

November 15, 2021

The Rule of Law

Next Post

November 17, 2021 Overcoming Polarization

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"While she worked for Trump she was a tool's tool!"

reg

Luther on Tools

"I know wired earbuds are making a comeback (I never stopped using them as I ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

"VCRs, tape decks, and cassette players are all having a revival among a segment of ..."

Tom Hering

Luther on Tools

"As a (retired) lawyer I see potential liability from sharing things like power or sharp ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was Jeremiah's faithful secretary and scribe?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Micah Zephaniah Eliakim Baruch

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »