Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
What to Do About the Backlash Against Evangelicals

What to Do About the Backlash Against Evangelicals

Last updated on: March 4, 2021 at 6:00 am by Gene Veith

0 Comments

What to Do About the Backlash Against Evangelicals 2021-02-27T22:00:00-05:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

So what can be done about the anti-Evangelical backlash that we have been discussing this week?

First of all, we should remember that the Church is always in need of Reformation. Our Reformed friends have a slogan to that effect, Ecclesia semper reformanda est, and in this they are not wrong. Certainly our historical moment, like the Middle Ages, is in need of a Reformation, not unlike the previous one.

The worldliness, doctrinal confusion, moral failures, and superficiality of so much of American Christianity call for a rediscovery of the Gospel, not just as a formula in time of conversion, but as a lifelong, fruit-bearing faith in Christ and His Cross, nourished by continual repentance and forgiveness.

Because so much of the current revulsion against Evangelicalism and conservative Protestantism more generally comes from politics, it will probably be good for us to be out of power and out of influence for awhile. Not good for the causes we hold dear, especially not good for unborn children and other “life not worthy of life,” as the eugenicists used to call it. We will still have to do everything we can to support the cause of life, even though political power will elude us. But our political exile may help us to rethink our approach and our political theology, which might make us more effective in the right way should we ever gain political influence again.

Those measures are obvious, as is the realization from John 15 that the world will always hate us because the world hated Jesus whom we follow. We need to adjust our expectations and stop wanting to be liked so much. We should not be the pathetic cultural conformists that we have often become, hoping to win the culture by trying to be like the culture, a tactic that seldom works and that can lead us astray.

Here is another idea, a modest proposal, drawn from my experience with my own theological tradition, confessional Lutheranism. . . .

We Lutherans were the first evangelicals; that is, the first to be called “evangelical.” The word comes from the Greek word for “good news,” which in Old English comes out as “Gospel.” During the Reformation, those who believed in the Augsburg Confession–a.k.a. “Lutherans”–were known as “evangelicals,” since the Gospel that Jesus Christ died for sinners is the cornerstone of their entire theology. Later, followers of Calvin, Zwingli, and others who believed “Luther didn’t go far enough,” became known as the “Reformed.” So the old writings speak of the two strains of the Reformation: “Evangelicals” (the Lutherans) and the “Reformed” (basically, non-sacramental Protestants). In time, the word “evangelical” in English would be applied to Wesleyans, low church Anglicans, non-separatist Fundamentalists, and other Protestants with a high view of Scripture and the Gospel.

So we confessional Lutherans are very much “evangelicals,” both in the original sense and in the wider sense of adhering to the Gospel and the Word of God. But we are quite different from the more generic evangelicalism of contemporary American Christianity. We are sacramental, for one thing, believing in baptismal regeneration, the real presence of Christ in the bread and wine of Holy Communion which we receive for the forgiveness of our sins, confession and absolution, and the Word of God not as a rule book but as a direct encounter with the Holy Spirit. We worship liturgically, using the ancient forms of the historical church through the ages. Whereas many evangelicals have only a general theological framework, with broad latitude for individual beliefs, our theology is thoroughly “worked out,” so that we have addressed issues that other traditions have not. For example, our Two Kingdoms theology prevents the Church from confusing its message with any political program. Individual Christians may still be politically active, due to their vocation (another Lutheran theological concept) as citizens, but their faith has to do with the eternal kingdom, not the temporal kingdom of the state.

Anyway, back in the 1980’s, a book was published by our denominational publishing house entitled Evangelical Style, Lutheran Substance. Evangelicalism back then was popular and evangelical churches were growing to mega-dimensions. The book argued that Lutherans should become like American evangelicals, jettisoning their antiquated liturgy in favor of contemporary music, an informal atmosphere, and lively preaching. We could do that and still keep our “Lutheran substance”–that is, our doctrinal convictions–but if we just adopted that “evangelical style,” we would become much more popular and our congregations and church body would grow to new heights.

Many of our districts, pastors, and congregations adopted that tactic. Of course, style and substance are not so easily separated. In pursuit of the “evangelical style,” many Lutherans started using evangelical Bible studies and Sunday School curriculum, downplayed the sacramental life in favor of evangelical conversionism, and became virtually indistinguishable from the non-denominational megachurch down the road. I’m not saying that every congregation that adopted contemporary worship went that far, but some did. And, to be fair, this approach seemed to “work,” with some Lutheran churches growing to mega- proportions, though often at the expense of “Lutheran substance.”

This same pattern happened in nearly every denomination. Calvinists had their own way of worshipping and teaching, but conservative Presbyterians also began to look like “evangelicals.” So did Wesleyans. So did Baptists. So did Pentecostals. Even some Anglicans moved in this direction. Even some Catholics toned down their liturgy and brought out the guitars and contemporary Jesus songs.

The biggest Evangelical churches were nondenominational, which meant not only being unaffiliated with other churches, but setting themselves apart from any particular theological tradition. Pastors could teach pretty much whatever they wanted to. And the people in the pew could believe pretty much what they wanted. You could hold a Reformed view of salvation or an Arminian view, and that was all right. You could speak in tongues if you wanted to, but you didn’t have to. Though there tended to be an implicit theology–hardly any baptized infants or celebrated the Lord’s Supper much–the implication was that we are going on our own and that new approaches will be better than the old ones.

But that meant that when various denominations emulated the evangelicals, they too became non-denominational, losing their distinctives and their theological identity.

This happened became Evangelicalism was so popular. But it isn’t popular any more. It is “other.” The old argument was that churches needed to become like the evangelicals in order to reach the culture. But today the culture finds evangelicalism to be, as Hunter says, “repugnant.”

Here is my modest proposal. Drop the “evangelical” label. Let Lutherans be Lutherans, Presbyterians be Presbyterians, Wesleyans be Wesleyan, Pentecostals be Pentecostals, Baptists be Baptist.

Black Churches are not reviled but are widely respected in the culture, even among non-Christians. Many of those are proudly Baptist. Or Pentecostal. They share the theology of white Baptists and white Pentecostals.

The culture doesn’t have anything against the various Protestant traditions, as such, just with “Evangelicals.”

Non-denominational congregations could lose their generic label and choose a theological tradition to adhere to or formulate a new one. They could affiliate with like-minded congregations, while keeping their independent governance. In a sense, non-denominational congregations could form denominations.

Having different niches of Christianity, churches with different emphases and flavors, can give the non-churched different options, one of which might convey Christ to them.

The diversity within Christianity can appeal to our increasingly diverse culture. The faith could not be dismissed simply because one church or the other is “too political,” since other churches would not be political at all.

There would not be theological unity, but there could be a unity of worldview that could become a beneficial influence to the culture, as Christianity has been throughout history and throughout the world, until now. And there could be a unity in Christ, to be fully known only in eternity, but still experienced among fellow believers, particularly when they come up against the hostility of a secularist world.

Any other ideas?

Image by Denis Poltoradnev from Pixabay

church growth movement

denominations

Evangelical unpopularity

evangelicalism

Lutheranism

Reformation

Previous Post

March 3, 2021

Why Evangelicals Are So Disliked, Part II

Next Post

March 5, 2021 Foucault's Philosophy of Power, Sex, and Death

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"While she worked for Trump she was a tool's tool!"

reg

Luther on Tools

"I know wired earbuds are making a comeback (I never stopped using them as I ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

"VCRs, tape decks, and cassette players are all having a revival among a segment of ..."

Tom Hering

Luther on Tools

"As a (retired) lawyer I see potential liability from sharing things like power or sharp ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: The Year of Jubilee occurred every fifty years.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »