Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

geneveith

Developments in the Sexual Revolution

Last updated on: December 22, 2020 at 6:00 am   by Gene Veith

0 Comments

Developments in the Sexual Revolution 2020-12-19T16:39:31-05:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Revolutions often begin with a sense of liberation and noble human values, only to end in oppression, brutality, and insanity.  So it is with the sexual revolution.

I will report on what some people in the revolutionary vanguard of that movement are thinking.  And about a major defeat for the pornography industry.

The human need and desire for money implies a right to it, according to some leftist theorists, who therefore advocate the redistribution of wealth.  Using that same logic, some people today are advocating the redistribution of sex.  From Aditi Murti:

A theory first espoused by Robin Hanson and later championed by violent involuntary celibate (incel) fringe forums, the redistribution of sex involves the state controlling women’s bodies and the men they have access to, in order to make sure everyone has access to consensual sex. If some women don’t consent, sex workers and sex robots will take their place.

But the use of sex robots, which some futurists are saying are the future of sex, poses problems of its own.  According to Murti,

As robots get more sophisticated AI, they will gain independent decision-making skills that will give them a specific legal status as electronic persons, according to a 2016 draft resolution put forth by the European Union Parliament. . .

In Artificial Intelligence and Law, ethicists Lily Frank and Sven Nyholm write, “The legal community should make it very clear that any member of the legal community who enjoys the status of personhood needs to give his, her, their, or its consent before any sexual acts are performed on them. It cannot be that the legal community does anything that can be construed as condoning what is sometimes called ‘rape-culture,’ i.e., a mindset by which non-consensual sex is normalized or otherwise implicitly or explicitly approved of largely as a result sexist attitudes, institutions, and patterns of behavior.”

Sex robots that can give and withdraw consent already exist, but the models of consent utilized are a work-in-progress. This is mainly because, as of now, sex robots can only simulate consent, rather than actively give consent.  It is imperative to note that meaningful consent is possible only if robots achieve independent decision-making skills — a possibility many policymakers and researchers believe is only a few decades away.

Murti says that some sex robots simulate consent by shutting down if the user gets too rough.  But, say ethicists, that very lack of “consent” can cause users to rape the robots.  This contributes to a mindset that will treat actual women that way.  Yes, reducing human beings to sex objects will be the effect of having sex with objects.

Notice, though, what this discussion reveals about where we are today.  Instead of thinking in terms of transcendent moral absolutes to direct our sexuality, the only criterion left today that can determine whether or not sexual activity is licit or not is consent.  This is indeed important to traditional morality, but if that is the only relevant issue, it becomes hard to apply.  If consent is necessary for licit sex, and we have sex with machines, how can machines consent?

Note too the impoverished view of human beings that we have come to.  Christians believe that individuals have immortal souls, a complex spiritual dimension that includes but is not limited to reason, will, memory, conscience, consciousness, and an eternal core.  Today, some people reduce personhood to reason, so that they think “artificial intelligence” can turn a computer into a person.  Others reduce personhood to the will, so that a machine that can respond in alternative ways must, after this ability is highly enough developed, be considered a person.  Once again, I refer you to that post The Brain is NOT a Computer, which cites an expert in both computers and the brain who explains that the connections people make are only metaphors, so that artificial intelligence and artificial decision-making have nothing to do with the mind or personhood.

Meanwhile, pornography–another example of dehumanized, disembodied sex–has taken a major hit.  Investigative reporting by New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof disclosed that the world’s largest online pornography site Pornhub is rife with videos featuring sex with minors, rape, revenge porn, and other kinds of exploitive and (yes) nonconsensual sex.  This expose has brought pressure on the Canadian company Mindgeek, which operates much of the pornography on the internet.

In the ensuring uproar, the major credit card companies–Visa, Mastercard, and Discover–have announced that they will no longer process payments to the company.

Also, Canadian officials are investigating the charges legal measures against Mindgeek and American senators Ben Sasse (R-Nebraska) and Josh Hawley (R-Missouri) are proposing legislation making it easier for victims to sue pornographers.

Meanwhile, Mindgeek has sought to purge Pornhub of the problematic and questionable material that the article identified.  As a result, two-thirds of its videos have been taken down, dropping from 13.5 million videos to 4.7 million.  (Read this article from Christianity Today.)

So there are limits after all.  Even the one criterion of consent is enough to thwart the sexual revolutionaries.  And perhaps inspire a counter-revolution.

 

Image by Stefan Keller from Pixabay 

 

 

crime

Ethics

Philosophy

sex

technology

consent

Mindgeek sanctions

pornography

sex robots

sexual revolution

Previous Post



December 21, 2020

We Americans Don't Trust Each Other

Next Post



December 23, 2020 The Christ Child in Revelation

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"I know wired earbuds are making a comeback (I never stopped using them as I ..."

reg


Luther on Tools

"VCRs, tape decks, and cassette players are all having a revival among a segment of ..."

Tom Hering


Luther on Tools

"As a (retired) lawyer I see potential liability from sharing things like power or sharp ..."

reg


Luther on Tools

"I am not sure the items you mentioned, though disused, discontinued, discarded, could be considered ..."

reg


Luther on Tools


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the key message of Proverbs about how to live?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Seek power Amass riches Pursue wisdom Win battles

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »

Related posts from Cranach

Family

Luther on Tools

Cranach

Family

Monday Miscellany, 10/12/26

Cranach

Family

Our New Book on Technology & Vocation

Cranach

Family

Gen Z Wants Evildoers to Be Punished, Not...

Cranach

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

57th Dove Awards Honor Dolly Parton, Crown New...

On gospel music’s biggest night, the 57th annual GMA Dove Awards honored...

The First Eucharistic Controversy: Christ’s Real Presence

For Catholics, the Eucharist is the source and summit of the Christian...

What a Stop Sign Can Teach Us About...

How to Make a Decision When You Can't Hear God Main point:...

Archdiocese Hosts Military Marriage Retreat in Germany

RASTATT, Germany — The transient military lifestyle, with its frequent deployments and...

Minted in God's Image

Nearly every morning, I make the drive to Detroit with my high-school-age...

The Real AI Story Is Adoption Without Trust

Artificial intelligence has crossed a political threshold. It is no longer a...

view all Evangelical blogs

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube