Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
The Scientist Who Calculates the End of America

The Scientist Who Calculates the End of America

Last updated on: November 30, 2020 at 6:00 am by Gene Veith

0 Comments

The Scientist Who Calculates the End of America 2020-11-28T14:29:18-05:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A scientist has devised a mathematical formula for calculating when nations and civilizations fall apart. Ten years ago, he ran his numbers for the United States. Things would start to collapse, according to his calculations, in 2020.

Now, first of all, I am highly skeptical, as I will explain. But his analysis raises some very interesting issues and draws attention to factors that most observers have neglected.

The scientist’s name is Peter Turchin, whose parents immigrated from Russia when he was a child and who presently is on the faculty of the University of Connecticut. He is a zoologist, a specialist in ecology, the branch of biology that studies the relationship between organisms and their environment. He became the world’s leading authority on the ecology of pine beetles, specifically, why their populations rise and why they decline. From that, he branched off into human ecology.

Turchin sought to apply mathematics to history, using the same methods that scientists use to study natural systems. For an account of his ideas, his methods, and his conclusions, see Graeme Wood’s article in The Atlantic Can History Predict the Future?

Turchin claims to have identified factors and quantified them into a model that accounts for the various social collapses over the last 10,000 years. “The fundamental problems,” according to The Atlantic‘s summary, “are a dark triad of social maladies: a bloated elite class, with too few elite jobs to go around; declining living standards among the general population; and a government that can’t cover its financial positions.”

Sound familiar? I was especially intrigued with what Dr. Turchin says about what happens with a society’s elites. For various reasons, more and more people rise to elite status. That is, social mobility increases. People acquire greater wealth and/or greater education. In our society, more and more Americans earn college degrees, something that used to be reserved for an elite few. Social mobility is a good thing. And yet, eventually, the number of people with elite credentials increases to the point that there are no longer enough jobs for them commensurate with their social status.

When that happens, the elite who are shut out from power become a counter-elite. They oppose the “establishment” elite. Whereupon they take up the cause of the non-elite, the “commoners,” who have problems of their own. Here is what happens, in the words of Graeme Woods:

Elite overproduction creates counter-elites, and counter-elites look for allies among the commoners. If commoners’ living standards slip—not relative to the elites, but relative to what they had before—they accept the overtures of the counter-elites and start oiling the axles of their tumbrels. Commoners’ lives grow worse, and the few who try to pull themselves onto the elite lifeboat are pushed back into the water by those already aboard. The final trigger of impending collapse, Turchin says, tends to be state insolvency. At some point rising insecurity becomes expensive. The elites have to pacify unhappy citizens with handouts and freebies—and when these run out, they have to police dissent and oppress people. Eventually the state exhausts all short-term solutions, and what was heretofore a coherent civilization disintegrates.

Members of the counter-elite lead the commoners in a revolution or in some kind of political breakdown, going on to build something new on the rubble.

The rise of the counter-elite today, according to The Atlantic article, is exemplified by Donald Trump, who, despite his Ivy League degree (University of Pennsylvania) and great wealth, has not really fit in with the social circles of the true elite who constitute what Turchin calls our “ruling class.” Instead, though, Trump has become the champion of the working class, the “commoners” who confounded their social superiors by propelling him to the presidency, where he overthrew many other elite norms (e.g., political correctness, cosmopolitanism, free trade, etc.).

Do you see a problem with this analysis? Trump’s rise was in 2016. Joe Biden was elected in the calculated year of our doom 2020. And the Democratic Party, though by Turchin’s analysis is indeed the home of our well-educated affluent ruling class, claims to be, in effect, the counter-elite, championing the cause of “ordinary Americans” against “the rich.” And what are we to make of “woke capitalism,” in which the leaders of our largest and most influential corporations are embracing political and social progressivism? Actually, all factions of our elite claim to be a counter-elite, championing the working class, which means that no one is doing much for the working class.

Turchin’s analysis might work for his own Russia, in which university students rose up with the working class to bring down the Czar. After all, Lenin himself said that “the history of all countries shows that the working class, exclusively by its own efforts, is able to develop only trade-union consciousness,” and that true socialism can only come when the workers are led by “educated representatives of the propertied classes.” And lots of apparatchiks employed by the Soviet bureaucracy helped bring down the U.S.S.R. Turchin’s thesis might well apply to the French Revolution, in which minor aristocrats joined with the sans culottes, and maybe the fall of the Roman Republic, when Julius Caesar came out of exile with the support of the plebians.

But Turchin’s analysis assumes that the elite is always in charge, whether to maintain the status quo or to overthrow it. Social movements from the ground up seem to be excluded. To what extent did members of the middle and upper class lead the revolutions and to what extent were they joining it in an attempt to survive it? (Indeed, many revolutionary aristocrats perished in the Reign of Terror, and many bourgeois revolutionaries in Russia would be killed or consigned to the gulags. Their elite status only took them so far.)

His analysis also excludes external factors in the fall of nations and civilizations. Wars, conquests, natural disasters, and (yes) diseases also have played a role. The Roman Empire, as opposed to the Republic, was brought down by barbarian invasions, as well as by dysfunctional elitists and imperial insolvency. And there are other kinds of internal factors, as well. Medieval society was remade by the Reformation, whose emphasis on teaching “commoners” how to read the Bible did lead to social mobility, but of a kind that would lead to democracy rather than social collapse.

I can’t speak to Turchin’s mathematical models, but his thesis strikes me as reductionistic–that is, oversimplifying complex factors–and deterministic, as if human beings possess no more agency than pine beetles. What he identifies as elites and counter-elites can apply to either side–not just with today’s Republicans and Democrats, but to the Roman aristocrats of the Senate and to the aristocrats of the Empire, and to the intelligentsia of the Soviet writers’ unions and to the dissident intellectuals –meaning that the model is non-falsifiable and thus unscientific.

To be sure, he raises valid issues. Governments spending too much money is indeed a problem, but that is well-known, as is the prospect of economic collapse. His attention to the role of elites and counter-elites is intriguing. But it plays to the notion already popular with his fellow-academics and other members of the ruling class that they control everything. But they don’t.

Illustration of “Elite”: Winner by Gregor Cresnar (CC BY) from the Noun Project

fall of civilizations

scientific predictions

Previous Post

November 27, 2020

Why It's Hard to Worship with Pop Music Styles

Next Post

December 1, 2020 The Doctrine of Original Sin as an Essential American Conviction

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"While she worked for Trump she was a tool's tool!"

reg

Luther on Tools

"I know wired earbuds are making a comeback (I never stopped using them as I ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

"VCRs, tape decks, and cassette players are all having a revival among a segment of ..."

Tom Hering

Luther on Tools

"As a (retired) lawyer I see potential liability from sharing things like power or sharp ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which brother's descendants would be kings according to Jacob's blessing?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Reuben Judah Dan Levi

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »